Judges Split Over Collecting Real Estate Fee Without a License
Before Gov. Nathan Deal nominated Judge Charlie Bethel to the bench nearly a year ago, he was a state senator. So it was with a different perspective that he opined the majority's decision was not what the General Assembly had in mind with exceptions to the licensing requirement.
November 09, 2017 at 02:17 PM
3 minute read
|
In a flurry of end-of-term opinions last week, the Georgia Court of Appeals broke ranks over whether someone without a real estate license should be able to collect a referral fee.
“Today, for the first time, our Court decides that an individual without a real estate license has standing to sue for commissions earned from the provision of real estate brokerage services. As this decision is contrary to previous interpretations of the real estate brokerage licensing statute in binding decisions of this Court and our Supreme Court, I respectfully dissent,” Judge Charlie Bethel wrote.
Before Gov. Nathan Deal nominated Bethel to the bench nearly a year ago, he was a state senator. So it was with a different perspective that he opined that the majority's decision was not what the General Assembly had in mind with exceptions to the licensing requirement. Bethel said the exception was to be a safe harbor to protect nonbrokers from criminal prosecution if they assisted in an occasional real estate deal without expectation of compensation.
With the original panel of three split, the decision went to seven judges, enough to be called “whole court,” although the group now has 15 members. In the end, Bethel was the lone dissenter.
Judge Christopher McFadden wrote for the majority in affirming Green County Superior Court Judge Alison Burleson's denial of a summary judgment motion lodged by Oconee Investment Group. Oconee filed this interlocutory appeal.
McFadden was joined by Presiding Judges Anne Barnes and M. Yvette Miller, as well as Judges Sara Doyle, Elizabeth Branch, Carla Wong McMillian and Clyde Reese.
McFadden's decision means Lisa Denton Turk can go forward with her lawsuit against Oconee.
As McFadden told the tale in his opinion, Oconee's agent had offered to sell Turk multiple lots and trailers in a real estate development. She declined because she didn't have the money. They reached an agreement under which Oconee would give Turk a specific lot and trailer in development if she referred a purchaser for the remaining lots and trailers at a set minimum price. She kept her end of the bargain, but Oconee refused to pay her as promised: The lot and trailer agreed upon or, failing that, a fee of $20,000, according to the court.
Instead, Oconee allegedly tried to short her with a fee of $7,200 or a credit toward the purchase of the lot and trailer. She declined and sued, alleging breach of contract and unjust enrichment.
“Oconee argues on appeal that it is entitled to summary judgment on the ground that OCGA § 43-40-24 (a) bars each of Turk's claims because she did not have a Georgia real estate brokerage license,” McFadden wrote. “We disagree.”
McFadden said Turk falls within an exception carved out by a newer version of the law for real estate transactions.
Oconee was represented by Adam Rosenberg of the Law Office of Russell Wall in Greensboro. Rosenberg declined to comment, except to say he has filed a motion for reconsideration.
Turk's attorney is Michael Ford of Ford & Josey in Atlanta. Ford could not be reached immediately.
The case is Oconee v. Turk, No. A17A1193.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250