Woman Allegedly Fired Over Having a Period at Work Settles
Alicia Coleman, had been employed through a job training and employment agency in Fort Benning, Georgia as a 911 operator, a job she had held for nearly a decade. She alleged that she was terminated in 2016 after her period came on unexpectedly while at work
November 10, 2017 at 02:00 PM
4 minute read
Getty Images
Lawyers with an Atlanta plaintiff labor and employment firm and the American Civil Liberties Union announced Friday they have reached a settlement for a woman who filed an unusual discrimination case, though the accord's terms were not revealed.
Alicia Coleman had been employed through a job-training and employment agency in Fort Benning as a 911 operator, a job she had held for nearly a decade. She alleged that she was terminated in 2016 after her period came on unexpectedly while at work. Because she was going through menopause, her period had become irregular and could be very sudden and heavy, she claimed. She said that after leaking on two occasions several months apart, her employer fired her, claiming that it was because she had failed to use proper hygiene, according to a joint statement Friday from Coleman, the ACLU and the Buckley Beal firm.
“It's a shame that Ms. Coleman never got her day in court, but we are happy that we were able to arrive at a settlement for our client,” Sean Young, legal director for ACLU of Georgia, said in the news release. “Ms. Coleman's courage in speaking out helped start an important conversation about women and periods in the workplace, and to challenge taboos that treat simple biological facts experienced by half the population as shameful.”
Coleman initially filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia last January. That court dismissed her case, finding that she had not adequately alleged that what happened to her was a form of sex discrimination, according to the news release. She appealed to the Eleventh Circuit, arguing that premenopause and the associated sudden-onset heavy menstruation should be considered protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the federal law that prohibits workplace discrimination on the basis of sex, including “pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions.”
“I worked hard all my life, and I loved my job,” Coleman said in the news release. “I hope my speaking out will encourage other women who believe they have suffered discrimination in any form to come forward.”
The settlement came before the appeal was heard.
The employer is the Atlanta-based Bobby Dodd Institute, whose stated mission is to “empower people with disabilities and disadvantages to maximize their potential by securing economic self-sufficiency, independence and integration into society.”
The institute's chief advancement officer, Lisa Kennedy, sent the Daily Report the following response by email: “We admire the ACLU's tenacity in defense of women's rights. Being an employer ourselves, we support those exact rights. Our mission is to help those with disabilities and disadvantages find and keep work. We strive every day to do everything we can for our employees.
“It is important to know the court that originally heard this case dismissed it. We think that decision would have been upheld had the legal process continued, but from a business perspective, it made a lot more sense to resolve this case so that we could devote our time and resources to what we do best—helping people in need,” the institute's message continues. “We believe we followed the law in the difficult decision to dismiss Ms. Coleman and treated her fairly. We disagree with the way this issue has been portrayed by her attorneys and in much of the subsequent media coverage.”
The email concluded: “We wish Ms. Coleman the best in her future endeavors. As we move forward, we will continue to serve our employees and provide them with the best opportunities possible.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![On The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners On The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/b4/76/3db1a19e4d638d10ee312bb5bc46/2025-top-laterals-integration-767x633.jpg)
On The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners
7 minute read![Georgia's Next Judge? Sole Candidate Shortlisted to Rise to Bench Georgia's Next Judge? Sole Candidate Shortlisted to Rise to Bench](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1e/b5/2781124b422ebb7cc232dd321e95/james-jay-crowe-jr-2-767x633.jpg)
![Justice 'Weaponization Working Group' Will Examine Officials Who Investigated Trump, US AG Bondi Says Justice 'Weaponization Working Group' Will Examine Officials Who Investigated Trump, US AG Bondi Says](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/aa/c6/cf82c06b4d7882a436520799935e/pam-bondi-2025-016-767x633.jpg)
Justice 'Weaponization Working Group' Will Examine Officials Who Investigated Trump, US AG Bondi Says
![New Atlanta Litigation Firm Breaks Away From Swift Currie New Atlanta Litigation Firm Breaks Away From Swift Currie](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/cf/2f/b8cd56764d9697ea8c49758144ae/marsh-atkinson-brantley-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Parties’ Reservation of Rights Defeats Attempt to Enforce Settlement in Principle
- 2ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 3States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 4Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 5Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250