Interpreters Play Starring Role in 'Eliminating Barriers to Justice'
“Justice is going to be best served when everyone understands it,” said Jana J. Edmondson-Cooper, a bilingual trial lawyer and member of the Supreme Court Commission on Interpreters.
November 15, 2017 at 05:20 PM
3 minute read
Judge Dax Lopez, Jana J. Edmondson-Cooper and Talley Wells on a panel discussing comprehensive Georgia A2J policies update. (Photo: John Disney/ ALM)
Judges and lawyers discussed where interpreters are needed and how to put more of them into courtrooms—as well as to make sure they're qualified. Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice P. Harris Hines and State Bar of Georgia President Buck Rogers opened the event and highlighted the key role the interpreter plays.
“Justice is going to be best served when everyone understands it,” said Jana J. Edmondson-Cooper, a bilingual trial lawyer and member of the Supreme Court Commission on Interpreters who co-founded the annual conference, helped organize the event and spoke on two of the three panel discussions.
“One of the most important parts of my job is making sure people are treated fairly,” Fulton County State Court Judge Susan Edlein said. “That includes making sure they understand.”
But, Edlein added, with so many people speaking so many languages, finding a qualified or certified interpreter can be difficult. Yet the stakes are high. Judgments have been overturned on appeal because interpreters were either not available or not accurate.
Edlein recalled a scenario where two native Korean speakers—witness and interpreter—were going on at length in a conversation no one else in the courtroom could understand.
Translation: “He said yes.”
“No, he said more than that,” the judge replied.
“He was using curse words,” the interpreter answered.
“You have to use those words,” Edlein said.
“I can't cuss in court,” said the interpreter.
The judge's answer: “You're not cussing. He's cussing.”
David Hoover, a federally certified interpreter with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, said the No. 1 way to tell if an interpreter is not getting it right is resorting to third person instead of first person. The interpreter should be speaking as if he or she is the witness or defendant. Perfection is almost impossible, so it's important for interpreters to speak up clearly and tell the court when they didn't understand something, he said.
Until recently, one of the challenges for lawyers working with non-English speaking clients or witnesses was that the rules for Georgia courts did not require judges to provide interpreters. The only rule applied addressed pretrial orders in civil cases. But it did not require that the court cover the cost. And it said if an interpreter is not available, the witness can be excluded.
“That's really bad,” DeKalb County State Court Judge Dax Lopez. “That's not a good rule.”
Lopez changed the rule. It took two years and many rounds of changes from judges and Georgia Supreme Court justices—including additional comments this year when Gov. Nathan Deal added three more members to the high court.
The new rule does require courts to provide interpreters where needed. Lawyers who once reported that when they told judges they have to provide an interpreter, some said, “No. I don't,” now have a tool. As Lopez put it, “Rule 7.3's got your back.”
Lopez drew applause on that point, and also on the mention that the judge, who was born in Puerto Rico, holds some DUI courts entirely in Spanish.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Atlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Trending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250