Huff Powell Notches Back-to-Back Med-Mal Defense Wins
Huff, Powell & Bailey partner led a defense victory in an Albany medical malpractice trial, then returned to assist a firm partner who another med-mal trial in Fulton County.
November 20, 2017 at 02:42 PM
15 minute read
Huff Powell & Bailey partner Jeffrey Braintwain notched a defense victory in a “heart-wrenching” medical malpractice case involving a brain-damaged baby in Albany, then returned to Atlanta to sit second chair as firm partner L. Evan Cline won another trial concerning a woman who suffered a massive heart attack at a Gwinnett County hospital.
Braintwain said the Albany trial, which involved injuries a baby suffered more than 10 years ago, was “a nail-biter on both sides.”
“This was an incredibly sympathetic plaintiff, just a beautiful child,” said Braintwain, who tried the case with associate Pete Temesgen of Huff Powell's Columbus office.
The plaintiffs' case was tried by Paul Phillips and Patrick Flynn of Albany's Flynn Peeler Phillips; also present was the filing attorney, Albany solo Ralph Scoccimaro.
Phillips said the case was very complex, noting that it went before the Georgia Court of Appeals and Supreme Court. At issue was whether the defendant, a physician's assistant, performed “emergency care” under a state law requiring plaintiffs suing emergency care providers to prove they acted with “gross negligence,” a higher standard than in other medical malpractice cases.
There was also evidence that the child may have been abused by her babysitter, Phillips said, “but who was doing it was hard to figure out, because you've got this outside villain.”
Phillips said his team is still considering whether to appeal or otherwise challenge the verdict.
The case began in 2007 when 6-month-old Keira Pech's babysitter called the child's mother to say Keira had rolled off a low bed while the sitter was distracted. The mother, Thu Nguyen, took her to the emergency room at Phoebe Putney Hospital in Albany.
Physician's assistant Michael Heyer examined Keira and found what Braintwain described as a “goose egg” bump to the head. He did not order an X-ray or CT scan, and Keira was discharged without seeing a doctor.
Three days later, Keira was again at the babysitter's when she began having seizures. The sitter called an ambulance, and Keira was in full cardiac arrest when she arrived at Phoebe Putney's ER.
A CT scan showed a skull fracture and “both old and new intracranial bleeding,” according to plaintiffs' filings. Surgery was performed to relieve the pressure, but Keira suffered profound brain damage.
In 2009, Keira's parents and conservator sued Heyer and his employer, Southwestern Emergency Physicians, in Dougherty County Superior Court.
Ruling on summary judgment, Judge Denise Marshall declared that Heyer had not provided “emergency medical care” and that, to prevail, the plaintiffs had to show only ordinary negligence on his part.
The Court of Appeals reversed, ruling that the jury must decide whether he provided emergency care, and the Supreme Court affirmed that ruling.
During a trial that began Oct. 23, Braintwain said a key issue was whether Keira had been injured again after her first trip to the ER.
“Our case was that there were two injuries: the minor fall that was treated properly, and a horrible high–impact injury that caused the brain bleeding and everything associated with it,” he said.
Keira's parents testified that, had they been told there was evidence of abuse, they would not have taken the baby back to the sitter and would have admitted her to the hospital, “both of which were hotly debated,” Braintwain said.
“There was really no doubt there was abuse and that it was happening somehow at the babysitter's,” said Phillips, who argued the case with Flynn.
“Our case was that, if the right thing had been done the first time, there never would have been a second incident,” he said.
Braintwain said key experts included emergency medicine specialist Martin Lutz of Greenville Memorial Hospital in South Carolina for the plaintiffs and child abuse expert David Bernard from the University of Alabama for the defense.
Braintwain said that in closing statements, the plaintiffs' asked for nearly $19 million.
The trial lasted eight days, and on Nov. 1 the jury took about two and a half hours to find for the defense.
Braintwain said jurors told him they had felt tremendous sympathy for Keira.
“They just didn't think the evidence supported the case,” he said. “There was so much intrigue and fishiness about the babysitter, I think they concluded there was another injury,” he said.
The following week Braintwain joined Cline in Fulton County State Court, where they were defending Gwinnett Emergency Specialists and Dr. Michael Violette.
A co-defendant, the Gwinnett Medical Center, was represented by Hall Booth Smith partners Rush Smith and William Gordon Jr.
“Gwinnett Medical Center was pleased that the jury agreed that the nursing care it provided was excellent,” said Smith, a sentiment he said jurors reaffirmed after the trial.
According to Cline and trial documents, the case began in 2008 when Margaret Brown, then 74, was taken by ambulance to the Gwinnett Medical Center complaining of chest and “tearing” back pain.
Violette put her on a cardiac monitor and ordered testing, and Brown was also given pain medication.
A few hours after arriving, Brown was having a consultation when an EKG indicated she was having a heart attack. She was given a clot-busting drug but then had to undergo cardiac catheterization and bypass surgery.
In 2010, Atlanta solo Joseph King Jr. filed suit on Brown's behalf, asserting that her heart had been permanently damaged because Violette had “overlooked” her deteriorating heart, allowing the heart attack to occur.
The hospital was sued because of alleged shortfalls by its nursing and support staff.
“The interesting part of the case from a medical standpoint is that her EKG was normal, her cardiac enzymes were normal, then after about four hours she had a septal heart attack, what they call a widow-maker,” Cline said.
“Almost everybody who has one of these outside of a hospital dies, and it's only because she was right in front of their faces that she lived,” said Cline. “We argued that this is a happy case.”
During a five-day trial before Judge Fred Eady, Cline said the plaintiffs “basically said the EKG that was done when she hit door showed something concerning for a potential heart attack and that she should have been given a clot-buster earlier.”
Kline said the two defense teams presented “very much a united front.”
Cline said the plaintiff's main expert was emergency medicine specialist Fred Mushkat with Baptist Health Paducah in Minnesota.
In closing, Cline said King asked for $100,000 a year for the past nine years “plus whatever they thought she should get going forward.”
The trial lasted five days, and on Nov. 14 Cline said the jury took less than 30 minutes to find for the defense.
Cline said that, during jury selection, when asked whether any of them knew what a “widow-maker” was, nearly all of the jurors raised their hands.
“So I think there was some understanding among the jury that she was actually very lucky to be alive,” Cline said.
King said via email that he and his client have not decided whether to appeal or otherwise challenge the verdict.
Jeffrey BraintwainHuff Powell & Bailey partner Jeffrey Braintwain notched a defense victory in a “heart-wrenching” medical malpractice case involving a brain-damaged baby in Albany, then returned to Atlanta to sit second chair as firm partner L. Evan Cline won another trial concerning a woman who suffered a massive heart attack at a Gwinnett County hospital.
Braintwain said the Albany trial, which involved injuries a baby suffered more than 10 years ago, was “a nail-biter on both sides.”
“This was an incredibly sympathetic plaintiff, just a beautiful child,” said Braintwain, who tried the case with associate Pete Temesgen of Huff Powell's Columbus office.
The plaintiffs' case was tried by Paul Phillips and Patrick Flynn of Albany's Flynn Peeler Phillips; also present was the filing attorney, Albany solo Ralph Scoccimaro.
Phillips said the case was very complex, noting that it went before the Georgia Court of Appeals and Supreme Court. At issue was whether the defendant, a physician's assistant, performed “emergency care” under a state law requiring plaintiffs suing emergency care providers to prove they acted with “gross negligence,” a higher standard than in other medical malpractice cases.
There was also evidence that the child may have been abused by her babysitter, Phillips said, “but who was doing it was hard to figure out, because you've got this outside villain.”
Phillips said his team is still considering whether to appeal or otherwise challenge the verdict.
The case began in 2007 when 6-month-old Keira Pech's babysitter called the child's mother to say Keira had rolled off a low bed while the sitter was distracted. The mother, Thu Nguyen, took her to the emergency room at Phoebe Putney Hospital in Albany.
Physician's assistant Michael Heyer examined Keira and found what Braintwain described as a “goose egg” bump to the head. He did not order an X-ray or CT scan, and Keira was discharged without seeing a doctor.
Three days later, Keira was again at the babysitter's when she began having seizures. The sitter called an ambulance, and Keira was in full cardiac arrest when she arrived at Phoebe Putney's ER.
A CT scan showed a skull fracture and “both old and new intracranial bleeding,” according to plaintiffs' filings. Surgery was performed to relieve the pressure, but Keira suffered profound brain damage.
In 2009, Keira's parents and conservator sued Heyer and his employer, Southwestern Emergency Physicians, in Dougherty County Superior Court.
Ruling on summary judgment, Judge
The Court of Appeals reversed, ruling that the jury must decide whether he provided emergency care, and the Supreme Court affirmed that ruling.
During a trial that began Oct. 23, Braintwain said a key issue was whether Keira had been injured again after her first trip to the ER.
“Our case was that there were two injuries: the minor fall that was treated properly, and a horrible high–impact injury that caused the brain bleeding and everything associated with it,” he said.
Keira's parents testified that, had they been told there was evidence of abuse, they would not have taken the baby back to the sitter and would have admitted her to the hospital, “both of which were hotly debated,” Braintwain said.
“There was really no doubt there was abuse and that it was happening somehow at the babysitter's,” said Phillips, who argued the case with Flynn.
“Our case was that, if the right thing had been done the first time, there never would have been a second incident,” he said.
Braintwain said key experts included emergency medicine specialist Martin Lutz of Greenville Memorial Hospital in South Carolina for the plaintiffs and child abuse expert David Bernard from the University of Alabama for the defense.
Braintwain said that in closing statements, the plaintiffs' asked for nearly $19 million.
The trial lasted eight days, and on Nov. 1 the jury took about two and a half hours to find for the defense.
Braintwain said jurors told him they had felt tremendous sympathy for Keira.
“They just didn't think the evidence supported the case,” he said. “There was so much intrigue and fishiness about the babysitter, I think they concluded there was another injury,” he said.
The following week Braintwain joined Cline in Fulton County State Court, where they were defending Gwinnett Emergency Specialists and Dr. Michael Violette.
A co-defendant, the Gwinnett Medical Center, was represented by
“Gwinnett Medical Center was pleased that the jury agreed that the nursing care it provided was excellent,” said Smith, a sentiment he said jurors reaffirmed after the trial.
According to Cline and trial documents, the case began in 2008 when Margaret Brown, then 74, was taken by ambulance to the Gwinnett Medical Center complaining of chest and “tearing” back pain.
Violette put her on a cardiac monitor and ordered testing, and Brown was also given pain medication.
A few hours after arriving, Brown was having a consultation when an EKG indicated she was having a heart attack. She was given a clot-busting drug but then had to undergo cardiac catheterization and bypass surgery.
In 2010, Atlanta solo Joseph King Jr. filed suit on Brown's behalf, asserting that her heart had been permanently damaged because Violette had “overlooked” her deteriorating heart, allowing the heart attack to occur.
The hospital was sued because of alleged shortfalls by its nursing and support staff.
“The interesting part of the case from a medical standpoint is that her EKG was normal, her cardiac enzymes were normal, then after about four hours she had a septal heart attack, what they call a widow-maker,” Cline said.
“Almost everybody who has one of these outside of a hospital dies, and it's only because she was right in front of their faces that she lived,” said Cline. “We argued that this is a happy case.”
During a five-day trial before Judge Fred Eady, Cline said the plaintiffs “basically said the EKG that was done when she hit door showed something concerning for a potential heart attack and that she should have been given a clot-buster earlier.”
Kline said the two defense teams presented “very much a united front.”
Cline said the plaintiff's main expert was emergency medicine specialist Fred Mushkat with Baptist Health Paducah in Minnesota.
In closing, Cline said King asked for $100,000 a year for the past nine years “plus whatever they thought she should get going forward.”
The trial lasted five days, and on Nov. 14 Cline said the jury took less than 30 minutes to find for the defense.
Cline said that, during jury selection, when asked whether any of them knew what a “widow-maker” was, nearly all of the jurors raised their hands.
“So I think there was some understanding among the jury that she was actually very lucky to be alive,” Cline said.
King said via email that he and his client have not decided whether to appeal or otherwise challenge the verdict.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanctions Order Over Toyota's Failure to Provide English Translations of Documents Vacated by Appeals Court
4 minute readFederal Court Rejects Plaintiff's Attempt to Amend Claims Against Weapons Manufacturer
Art of the Settlement: Trump Attorney Reveals Strategy in ABC Lawsuit
Court Advisory Committee Inches Forward on Transparency in Litigation Financing
Trending Stories
- 1Special Series Part 5: The State’s Bond Lock Impermissibly Delegates Legislative Authority
- 2President-Elect Donald Trump Sentenced to Unconditional Discharge
- 3JCPenney Customer's Slip-and-Fall From Bodily Substance Suit Best Left for a Jury to Decide, Judge Rules
- 4Products Liability: The Absence of Other Similar Claims—a Defense or a Misleading Effort to Sway a Jury?
- 5529 Accounts Are Not Your Divorce Piggybank
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250