Sally Yates and Friends Urge 11th Circuit to End Calhoun's Money Bail
“A bail system that indiscriminately jails indigent individuals charged with misdemeanors based solely on their economic status while immediately releasing those who can afford to post a bond is inconsistent with our country's promise of equal justice,” Yates said.
November 21, 2017 at 02:31 PM
4 minute read
Sally Yates (Photo: John Disney/ ALM)
Sally Yates, famously fired by President Donald Trump as acting attorney general, has joined with 28 prosecutors and law enforcement officials from around the country in filing an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit opposing the City of Calhoun's so-called money bail system.
The issue is as framed in the brief is “whether the use of a fixed money bail schedule that results in the detention of indigent misdemeanor defendants for up to 48 hours solely based on their inability to pay is constitutionally permissible where the City of Calhoun has offered no explanation for why it needs 48 hours to determine indigence and where other more effective alternatives exist.”
“A bail system that indiscriminately jails indigent individuals charged with misdemeanors based solely on their economic status while immediately releasing those who can afford to post a bond is inconsistent with our country's promise of equal justice,” Yates said in a news release Tuesday from Georgetown Law School, where she now teaches.
The brief was drafted by Georgetown law's Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection Senior Litigator Mary McCord, who served for 20 years as a federal prosecutor and was acting assistant attorney general for national security. In August, the institute filed a similar amicus brief on behalf of prosecutors in O'Donnell v. Harris County, a suit challenging a money bail system in Texas.
“As career prosecutors, we know that using bail to keep poor people detained pretrial solely based on their inability to pay not only offends the Constitution, but also is counterproductive from a law enforcement perspective,” McCord said in the news release. “We depend on victims, witnesses, and jurors to participate in a criminal justice system they see as fair, and a system that determines freedom on the basis of wealth undercuts that notion.”
Another signer, former federal prosecutor and Fair and Just Prosecution Executive Director Miriam Krinsky, said in the news release: “It is well settled that alternatives to money bail—in place in jurisdictions around the country—are not simply the right approach, but are also a more sensible strategy that keep our communities safe by using individualized determinations of risk of flight and dangerousness. It is heartening to see prosecutive leaders coming together to speak out on the need to move away from a broken cash bail system and promote fair and equitable bail practices that enhance trust in, and contribute to the legitimacy of, our justice system.”
The brief acknowledged the City of Calhoun's initial response to the lawsuit over money bail was to adopt a standing order requiring bail hearings within 48 hours and the release of those who can establish the inability to pay. But the prosecutors argued that detention for even a limited amount of time can “yield serious harms such as loss of a job or disrupted family connections.” The prosecutors said Calhoun's standing bail order “does not go far enough to dispel the harm that the inequitable treatment of indigent misdemeanor defendants causes to the public's perception of the criminal justice system, and thus to law enforcement efforts.”
Furthermore, some of the offenses to which the order applies are not even offenses for which jail time is possible, the prosecutors said. For example, Maurice Walker—the named plaintiff—spent six days in detention for being a pedestrian under the influence of alcohol, which is not a jailable offense.
Additionally, the prosecutors said the bail amounts are set at the exact figures of the fines applicable for the charged offenses after conviction. So the schedule contributes to perceptions that bail is being used to extract a fine from the defendant prior to a finding of guilt.
The signers include current sitting District Attorneys Mark Dupree (Kansas City, Kansas), Stanley Garnett (Boulder, Colorado), Mark Gonzalez (Corpus Christi, Texas), Christian Gossett (Winnebago County, Wisconsin), David Soares (Albany, New York), Raúl Torrez (Albuquerque) and Cyrus Vance (New York County, New York), State Attorney Marilyn Mosby (Baltimore) and Prosecuting Attorney Carol Siemon (Ingham County, Michigan) and former Police Chiefs William Lansdowne (San Diego and Richmond, Calif.) and Brendan Cox (Albany, New York).
Correction: The initial version of this article misstated that the Calhoun case is before the U.S. Supreme Court. It is before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readOn The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
6 minute readWoman's Suit Alleging Negligence to Sex Trafficking by Hotel Tossed by Federal Judge
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250