Exit of McIver's Civil Lawyers Leaves 'Street Fighter' Harvey to Battle Prosecutors
With a March trial date approaching, accused killer Claud "Tex" McIver's legal team has narrowed to criminal defense specialist Bruce Harvey.
November 22, 2017 at 12:41 PM
16 minute read
This week's withdrawal of four of the five lawyers defending attorney Claud “Tex” McIver, accused of killing his wife more than a year ago, leaves a daunting task for the remaining lawyer, noted criminal defense specialist Bruce Harvey.
As the March 5 trial date approaches, Harvey faces a mammoth trove of discovery material that includes some 90,000 emails the state turned over last month, and 39 boxes of seized documents and other materials being reviewed by outside lawyers to protect privileged information from being turned over to the state.
So far, Harvey remains McIver's only counsel after a team of Polsinelli lawyers led by William Hill Jr., with shareholder Joseph Sharp and associate Alex Bartko, bowed out Monday.
Decatur solo Steve Maples, a friend of McIver who has represented him since last year's arrest, said Tuesday he plans to step aside next week.
McIver, 74, remains in jail despite being granted a $750,000 bond last month.
The withdrawal notice for the Polsinelli lawyers, all of whom specialize in civil litigation, does not indicate why they withdrew. Maples, who handles criminal and civil law, declined to discuss the case further.
Harvey, whose Atlanta firm hosts three additional attorneys, was in court Tuesday but, in an email, praised his colleagues' handling of the case thus far.
“William Hill and his firm have done an incredible job of managing Tex's case, and standing up for him in court battles with the prosecution,” Harvey said. “Now is the time to focus on the trial, and that's what we are doing.”
In response to a question concerning the mountain of materials that need to be reviewed, Harvey said “the defense is focusing now on trial prep and will be perfectly able to plow through the outstanding discovery.
“We are hoping to put all the pieces in place to get Tex out of jail and into a living space as soon as possible, and anticipate that will be very soon,” Harvey said.
A former Fisher & Phillips partner, McIver faces a seven-count indictment including murder, felony murder, aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony and three counts of influencing a witness.
The charges stem from a Sept. 25, 2016, incident when McIver, a passenger in the rear seat, shot his wife through the back of the front passenger seat as they were driven by a friend near Piedmont Park.
Diane McIver died later that night during surgery at Emory University Hospital. McIver claims the shooting was an accident.
McIver's trial was initially set to begin Oct. 30, but Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney postponed it after prosecutors delivered about 90,000 emails in response to a discovery request less than a month before the start date.
On Nov. 14, McIver's lawyers filed a motion objecting to the release of “documents and things” from 39 boxes of materials seized by investigators pursuant to a warrant.
McIver's lawyers argued that many of the documents are protected by attorney-client privilege and that others are outside the parameters of the search warrant and were illegally seized.
The office of District Attorney Paul Howard Jr. has retained a “taint team” headed by Nelson Mullins partner Anita Thomas to review the materials before they are released to the state.
The search warrant authorized investigators to seize materials which “may contain evidence relating to the joint and individual business and personal finances” of the McIvers and Diane McIver's estate.
In addition to correspondence and business records, however, the motion said the seized items range from greeting cards and a child's artwork to blank stationery and liquor bottles.
“The D.A.'s seizure of such items was done in knowing violation of the scope of the warrant and in bold and blatant violation of this court's warrant and Mr. McIver's rights,” it said. The motion asks McBurney to hold a hearing on the issue and “order that the taint team release only non-privileged documents, and things that fall within the scope of the warrant.”
McBurney has not ruled on the motion.
Criminal defense attorney Benjamin Davis, who has followed the case and has called upon Harvey for advice, said he expected McIver to jettison Hill and his colleagues as the case approached.
“I never thought they were going to remain on the case—not for this kind of fight. This is a street fight, and it's made for Bruce Harvey,” Davis said.
“If I'm a prosecutor, Bruce Harvey is the last attorney I want left on this case,” he added.
Davis is no stranger to document-heavy cases. He defended one of the 12 defendants in the Atlanta Public Schools cheating trial, where multiple CDs containing tens of thousands of documents were entered into evidence.
Davis said the state already indicated it was trying to buy time with last month's document dump, and he doesn't expect Harvey or McBurney—a former Fulton prosecutor and U.S attorney—to allow the pile of evidence to sideline the trial.
“Judge McBurney will understand what Bruce is going through,” said Davis. “I think they'll have an exchange where [lead prosecutor Clint] Rucker will try to make it seem like they're bending over backward to cooperate.”
“That'll be like waving a red flag to a bull for Bruce,” Davis said. “I think he'll remind the judge that he's being put in an unfair position.”
This week's withdrawal of four of the five lawyers defending attorney Claud “Tex” McIver, accused of killing his wife more than a year ago, leaves a daunting task for the remaining lawyer, noted criminal defense specialist Bruce Harvey.
As the March 5 trial date approaches, Harvey faces a mammoth trove of discovery material that includes some 90,000 emails the state turned over last month, and 39 boxes of seized documents and other materials being reviewed by outside lawyers to protect privileged information from being turned over to the state.
So far, Harvey remains McIver's only counsel after a team of
Decatur solo Steve Maples, a friend of McIver who has represented him since last year's arrest, said Tuesday he plans to step aside next week.
McIver, 74, remains in jail despite being granted a $750,000 bond last month.
The withdrawal notice for the
Harvey, whose Atlanta firm hosts three additional attorneys, was in court Tuesday but, in an email, praised his colleagues' handling of the case thus far.
“William Hill and his firm have done an incredible job of managing Tex's case, and standing up for him in court battles with the prosecution,” Harvey said. “Now is the time to focus on the trial, and that's what we are doing.”
In response to a question concerning the mountain of materials that need to be reviewed, Harvey said “the defense is focusing now on trial prep and will be perfectly able to plow through the outstanding discovery.
“We are hoping to put all the pieces in place to get Tex out of jail and into a living space as soon as possible, and anticipate that will be very soon,” Harvey said.
A former
The charges stem from a Sept. 25, 2016, incident when McIver, a passenger in the rear seat, shot his wife through the back of the front passenger seat as they were driven by a friend near Piedmont Park.
Diane McIver died later that night during surgery at Emory
McIver's trial was initially set to begin Oct. 30, but Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney postponed it after prosecutors delivered about 90,000 emails in response to a discovery request less than a month before the start date.
On Nov. 14, McIver's lawyers filed a motion objecting to the release of “documents and things” from 39 boxes of materials seized by investigators pursuant to a warrant.
McIver's lawyers argued that many of the documents are protected by attorney-client privilege and that others are outside the parameters of the search warrant and were illegally seized.
The office of District Attorney Paul Howard Jr. has retained a “taint team” headed by
The search warrant authorized investigators to seize materials which “may contain evidence relating to the joint and individual business and personal finances” of the McIvers and Diane McIver's estate.
In addition to correspondence and business records, however, the motion said the seized items range from greeting cards and a child's artwork to blank stationery and liquor bottles.
“The D.A.'s seizure of such items was done in knowing violation of the scope of the warrant and in bold and blatant violation of this court's warrant and Mr. McIver's rights,” it said. The motion asks McBurney to hold a hearing on the issue and “order that the taint team release only non-privileged documents, and things that fall within the scope of the warrant.”
McBurney has not ruled on the motion.
Criminal defense attorney Benjamin Davis, who has followed the case and has called upon Harvey for advice, said he expected McIver to jettison Hill and his colleagues as the case approached.
“I never thought they were going to remain on the case—not for this kind of fight. This is a street fight, and it's made for Bruce Harvey,” Davis said.
“If I'm a prosecutor, Bruce Harvey is the last attorney I want left on this case,” he added.
Davis is no stranger to document-heavy cases. He defended one of the 12 defendants in the Atlanta Public Schools cheating trial, where multiple CDs containing tens of thousands of documents were entered into evidence.
Davis said the state already indicated it was trying to buy time with last month's document dump, and he doesn't expect Harvey or McBurney—a former Fulton prosecutor and U.S attorney—to allow the pile of evidence to sideline the trial.
“Judge McBurney will understand what Bruce is going through,” said Davis. “I think they'll have an exchange where [lead prosecutor Clint] Rucker will try to make it seem like they're bending over backward to cooperate.”
“That'll be like waving a red flag to a bull for Bruce,” Davis said. “I think he'll remind the judge that he's being put in an unfair position.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readOn The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
6 minute readWoman's Suit Alleging Negligence to Sex Trafficking by Hotel Tossed by Federal Judge
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250