Report Sees Third Quarter Lull as Atlanta Firms Outperform U.S.
A small group of the region's biggest firms helped Atlanta avoid a greater slowdown in revenue and demand in the third quarter.
November 27, 2017 at 02:42 PM
4 minute read
After a bump in revenue and demand over the first six months of the year, things slowed a bit in the third quarter for large Atlanta and Southeastern law firms, according to a report released by Wells Fargo Private Bank's Legal Specialty Group.
The results for the region tracked with the performance of the legal market nationally, though Atlanta's third-quarter slowdown was less pronounced than for the rest of the Southeast or the U.S. at large.
“After a six-month bounce, firms overall are still up for the year, but they gave some of it back,” said Jeff Grossman, senior director of banking for The Private Bank.
Grossman said the six-month uptick could reflect a bounce back from uncertainty surrounding the U.S. presidential election sparking a lull in capital markets and M&A activity late last year.
“Now things are flattening out from the bounce,” he said.
Revenue grew 3.9 percent year-to-date through three quarters for the 20 Southeastern firms in Georgia, the Carolinas and Virginia surveyed by the Wells Fargo legal group—a slightly higher rate than the 3.7 percent revenue growth rate for the 135 large firms that participated in the survey nationally. The respondents included 70 Am Law 100 firms, as well as Am Law 200 and regional firms with revenue of at least $100 million, Grossman said.
Biggest Firms Move the Needle
Atlanta firms accounted for almost half of the Southeastern firms in the survey, with eight participating. The group did better than its Southeastern and national cohorts, with a 4.4 percent uptick in revenue.
Revenue per lawyer was up 3.9 percent for the Atlanta firms, substantially better than the 2.1 percent uptick in RPL for the Southeastern group and the 2.3 percent RPL growth nationally.
“The big Atlanta firms drive the results for the Southeastern group,” Grossman said, adding that, similarly, the positive performance of two or three large Atlanta firms drove the results for that group.
Demand, measured in total lawyer hours, was flat for both the Atlanta firms (down 0.5 percent) and the Southeastern group (down 1 percent). Demand nationally increased 1.4 percent for the nine-month period, compared with a 1.6 percent uptick at mid-year.
Hours per lawyer were down 0.9 percent year-to-date for the Atlanta firms (tracking with an 0.8 percent decline for the Southeastern group) but even so lawyers at these firms billed 1,698 hours on an annualized basis, compared with 1,607 hours per lawyer for the Southeastern firms, Grossman said.
“The hours per lawyer of this group are really high,” he said, adding that two Atlanta firms with very high hours per lawyers pushed up the average.
Grossman said that nationally as well there are a relatively small number of firms driving the results—for example a couple of firms in the Am Law 50 with double-digit revenue growth, which did not come from a merger.
“Whether we look at Atlanta or the Am Law 50, the results are skewed by a few firms outperforming everyone else,” he said.
Even though financial growth slowed for the legal market during the third quarter, firms are still doing alright, Grossman said. “Revenue is up three to four percent every year on average, and RPL is increasing slightly overall.”
“We all want to see the world back to where it was in 2008. It's not, but it's still good,” he added. “Some firms are challenged, but most firms are OK. They are raising rates every year and keeping pace.”
Grossman forecast that year-end results would look similar to the third-quarter report, noting that Am Law 50 firms continue to outperform lower-grossing firms.
“We're going to match those results as a whole is my expectation,” he said. “There is no sign of activity slowing down in the fourth quarter—and with inventory built up, if firms collect even half of that it should be a pretty good year.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250