Patent Lawyers Score Win for Velcro in Rare Georgia Courtroom Drama
The winning legal team from Fish & Richardson said in a news release Wednesday that it was the first patent jury verdict in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia since 2001 and the first in the entire state since 2008.
November 29, 2017 at 06:51 PM
3 minute read
The biggest news from a recent Velcro IP victory might not be who won but that a bunch of patent lawyers were in court at all.
The winning legal team from Fish & Richardson said in a news release Wednesday that it was the first patent jury verdict in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia since 2001 and the first in the entire state since 2008.
“It is not the rule, of course, for patent cases to go to trial,” Fish principal Christopher Green of Atlanta, who led the legal team for the Velcro Companies, said in an interview late Wednesday.
Patent cases are technical, complicated, time consuming and expensive to litigate. But the Fish & Richardson team has been involved in a number of those that have gone all the way.
“We're glad to be among the few lawyers that have had that experience,” Thad Kodish said in an interview Wednesday. Along with Green and Kodish, the team included Frank Scherkenbach, Jacqueline Tio, Sara Fish, and Bailey Benedict.
Because of the nature of a dispute over trade secrets, much of the evidence presented when they do go to trial is under seal or otherwise restricted.
“We'd love to impart our most brilliant 'Perry Mason' moments,” Kodish said. “But a lot of them are under very severe protective orders.”
As far as highly technical IP cases go, it could have been worse.
“On the continuum of complexity of patent cases,” Green said, “this one was somewhere in the middle.”
The weeklong trial before Judge Leslie Abrams concluded more than four years of litigation. The case goes back to August 2013 when YKK Corp. sued Velcro Companies—the original inventor of hook and loop fasteners—for patent infringement. YKK sought an injunction to remove VELCRO® Brand fasteners 4Gi and MH4 hook from the transportation market. The products are used in cars with fabric or leather seat covers. Fish & Richardson said it was a large market at risk.
“Velcro Companies is built on innovation and they understand and respect intellectual property rights,” Green said. “We were confident that Velcro Companies did not infringe YKK's patent and the jury agreed.”
The jury delivered a verdict in Velcro's favor on multiple claims Nov. 17, according to a partial trial transcript.
“Our company invented hook and loop fastener technology,” Velcro Companies CEO Fraser Cameron said in the news release. “We continue to develop versatile and commercially viable fastening solutions. We have worked tirelessly to protect our intellectual property, including preserving our strong recognizable VELCRO® Brand for hook and loop fasteners. We strongly believe in ethical conduct and respect the value of intellectual property, and we will continue to rigorously defend the IP and trademarks for our VELCRO® Brand products around the globe.”
YKK's legal team included David Reed of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton. Reed could not be reached immediately.
The case is YKK Corporation et al v. Velcro USA Inc. (Middle District of Georgia), No. 5:13-cv-00306-LJA.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute read'Didn't Notice Patient Wasn't Breathing': $13.7M Verdict Against Anesthesiologists
12 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250