Judicial Panel Orders Equifax Data Breach Cases Consolidated in Atlanta
Hundreds of cases stemming from a massive hack of Atlanta-based Equifax that compromised the personal and financial data of more than 145 million people, will be consolidated in federal court in Atlanta and presided over by the district's chief judge.
December 07, 2017 at 02:46 PM
4 minute read
Multidistrict litigation related to the massive data security breach that took place earlier this year at Atlanta-based credit bureau Equifax will be adjudicated in the company's hometown, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation announced Wednesday.
The panel has assigned the cases to U.S. District Chief Judge Thomas Thrash Jr., a veteran of MDL including the Home Depot data security breach MDL that compromised personal and financial data of an estimated 56 million customers in 2014.
Thrash, appointed to the federal bench by President Bill Clinton in 1997, is known for his fondness for Shakespeare, fishing and tennis—the only three subjects about which the judge has said he is willing to speak freely.
Thrash keeps a leather bound volume of Shakespeare's plays, embossed with a color portrait of the Bard, in his chambers and willingly pulls it out to look up and recite favorite passages, once telling the Daily Report, ”I do not consider myself to be a Shakespeare scholar. I just love the stuff he writes.”
Thrash is also known for the strict time limits he imposes on all parties—limits that counsel agree to and Thrash expects them to honor—before a trial begins. Whenever an attorney engages either in direct or cross-examination before a jury, the clock runs. And Thrash keeps time. One lawyer who has practiced in his court called it akin to punching a chess clock.
In consolidating hundreds of cases against Equifax, many of them proposed class actions, in Georgia, the multidistrict judicial panel rejected suggestions to have litigation stemming from the breathtaking data breach adjudicated in other federal districts across the nation, including Pennsylvania, Minnesota, California, Alabama, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri New Jersey, Oklahoma, Texas and Virginia.
The panel said that consolidating the cases in Georgia would not only be convenient to the parties and witnesses but also “promote the just and efficient conduct” of the litigation.
“Equifax is headquartered in that district, and relevant documents and witnesses thus likely will be found there,” the order said. “Selection of the district is supported by defendants and the vast majority of responding plaintiffs. Far more actions are pending in this district than in any other court in the nation.”
The panel also called Thrash “an experienced transferee judge who we are confident will steer this litigation on a prudent course.”
Some of the plaintiff financial institutions had asked the panel that their cases not be consolidated with those filed on behalf of an estimated 145.5 million consumers whom Equifax has acknowledged may have been affected by the breathtaking security breach. Instead, the financial institutions suggested that “a separate track” be created for them, but the panel declined to do so, saying that it would leave to Thrash “the extent and manner of coordination or consolidation” of actions in the Equifax MDL.
Thrash bifurcated the Home Depot data breach litigation into cases filed against the Atlanta-based home improvement chain by financial institutions and those filed by or on behalf of customers whose information was compromised.
Equifax's outside counsel at Atlanta's King & Spalding had asked the federal panel to consolidate the data breach cases in Atlanta. So did the Barnes Law Group, headed by former Georgia Gov. Roy Barnes, which joined forces with John Yanchunis of Morgan & Morgan in Tampa and Norman Siegel of Stueve Siegel Hanson in Kansas City, Missouri, to file the first suit against Equifax in the Northern District of Georgia. Thrash was one of several judges on the Northern District bench that the Barnes Law Group recommended.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Cradle to Grave': Children's Clothing Company Carter's Sued in Digital Privacy Class Action
Hall Booth Smith Experiences Data Breach—Here's What You Need to Know to Protect Your Firm's Data
Georgia Lawyers Speak at Conference Session Focusing on Rise of Collaboration Apps
4 minute readCould ChatGPT Soon Find Itself in Data Privacy Regulators' Crosshairs?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tom Girardi's Lawyers Want Next Month's Sentencing Delayed
- 2About the Awards: Florida Legal Awards 2025 Q&A with Regional Managing Editor Katie Hall
- 3Trump Nominates Ex-SEC Chief Jay Clayton to Helm Southern District of New York US Attorney's Office
- 4Steward Health CEO Saga Signals Escalation of Coercive Congressional Oversight Against Private Parties
- 5'They Should Have Tried to Negotiate': Jury Finds Against Insurer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250