Court of Appeals Candidates Like Rules Change on Panels
Former State Bar of Georgia president Ken Shigley and former Dougherty County district attorney Ken Hodges are the only announced candidates for the spot being vacated by Judge John Ellington, who is seeking an open seat on the state Supreme Court.
December 08, 2017 at 10:37 AM
2 minute read
Two lawyers seeking an open seat on the Georgia Court of Appeals said they like the change in court rules announced last week.
Former State Bar of Georgia president Ken Shigley and former Dougherty County district attorney Ken Hodges are the only announced candidates for the spot being vacated by Judge John Ellington, who is seeking an open seat on the state Supreme Court.
Shigley and Hodges both sounded approval for the changes, which included eliminating a rule requiring that six additional judges join three-judge panels that have split 2-1 on a case. The court now will issue 2-1 decisions, although they will be considered “physical precedent” only.
Shigley wrote in an email: “The Georgia Court of Appeals has a heavy caseload that, as a practical matter, has made it impracticable to hold routine conferences of panels regarding each case. I have always thought that was unfortunate. I have great confidence in the judges of the Court of Appeals who have made this rule change in reaction to the practical realities of managing their heavy caseload. Going forward, it is important to guard against allowing any change in process to diminish the degree of attention given to the merits of each case.”
Hodges wrote in an email: “The rule change allowing 2-1 decisions will bring the Georgia Court of Appeals into line with the majority of appellate courts. It will eliminate problems resulting from the intersection of our Constitutional Two-Term Rule (requiring appellate decisions by the end of the second term of court) and the prior requirement to go outside the original three judge panel for two categories of cases. This often required judges outside the original panel to consider and vote on cases with which they were unfamiliar with a very short time window, during the period known as 'Distress.' I believe this rule change will make 'Distress' less 'distressing' and hopefully help improve the already high quality of opinions from the Court of Appeals. It will make the process of the Court more efficient.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Didn't Notice Patient Wasn't Breathing': $13.7M Verdict Against Anesthesiologists
12 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Plaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win
- 2Bannon's Fraud Trial Delayed One Week as New, 'More Aggressive,' Defense Attorneys Get Ready
- 3'AI-Generated' Case References? This African Law Firm Is Under Investigation
- 4John Deere Annual Meeting Offers Peek Into DEI Strife That Looms for Companies Nationwide
- 5Why Associates in This Growing Legal Market Are Leaving Their Firms
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250