Ga. Senate Bill Would Allow Public Access to Court Recordings
State Sen. Josh McKoon, R-Columbus, said his legislation is in response to a recent Georgia Supreme Court ruling barring access to a court reporter's recording unless they have been made part of the court record.
January 05, 2018 at 06:04 PM
3 minute read
A bill prefiled in the Georgia Senate would expand public access to records and recordings of judicial proceedings, including court reporters' recordings that the Georgia Supreme Court recently declared off-limits unless they had been entered into the court record.
Sen. Josh MccKoon, R-Columbus, who filed the bill Dec. 19, said it is in direct response to that ruling.
The opinion ”is a great concern for me from a transparency point of view,” he said. “I think it's important that the public have access to these documents and records.”
The legislation—Senate Bill 311—would apply to the proceedings of any “tribunal in the state that is vested with powers of a judicial nature” and mandates that access to the records “shall not be exempted by order of a court of this state or by law” unless specifically exempted by the new law.
In addition to expanding the current definition of “public record” to include records and recordings, the bill would apply to the records of any judicial body “whether created by the Constitution of this state or by law, including but not limited to those not filed with an agency.”
In October, the Supreme Court of Georgia unanimously upheld a Floyd County judge's ruling that a court reporter's recordings from an old murder trial the producers of a podcast wanted to copy did not have to be provided.
The producers of the “Undisclosed” podcast had sought recordings from the 2001 murder trial of Joseph Watkins, but Floyd County Superior Court Judge William Sparks ruled that they could only listen to the tapes and not record them.
The opinion by Justice Nels Peterson said “a court reporter's recordings not filed with the court are not court records,” adding that other courts have tended to agree, unless there is some reason to doubt a transcript's accuracy.
Asked about the sections of his bill limiting the ability of a judge to seal records or otherwise bar access, McKoon agreed that the bill as drafted may be too broad for his fellow lawmakers and portions of the legal community.
“I've learned in the General Assembly that the best place to start is where you think the ideal policy will be,” he said. “I certainly expect we may see the focus narrow somewhat as it goes through the committee process.”
“My intention, once we come into session, is to reach out to the Judicial Council, the Prosecuting Attorneys Council, the court reporters and other relevant stakeholders for their input,” McKoon said.
In any case, “I think it should be the rule rather than the exception that these documents are open to the public,” he said.
The lawyers for “Undecided,” Caplan Cobb partners Michael Caplan and James Cobb, said they had not seen the bill until the Daily Report provided a copy and would need time to study it before offering any comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEvidence Explained: Prevailing Attorney Outlines Successful Defense in Inmate Death Case
Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readTrial Court Had No Authority to Reopen Voir Dire After Jury Impaneled in Civil Case, State Appellate Court Rules
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250