Civil Rights Lawyers Sue Alabama Sheriffs Over Jail Food
The Southern Center for Human Rights and Alabama Appleseed Center for Law and Justice filed a lawsuit challenging the refusal of 49 Alabama sheriffs to produce public records showing whether, and if so by how much, they have personally profited from funds allocated for feeding people in their jails.
January 09, 2018 at 11:10 AM
4 minute read
Neither the Alabama Sheriffs Association nor the state attorney general's office offered any response Monday to allegations from civil rights lawyers about abuse of funds meant to feed those locked up in county jails.
The Southern Center for Human Rights and Alabama Appleseed Center for Law and Justice filed a lawsuit challenging the refusal of 49 Alabama sheriffs to produce public records showing whether, and if so by how much, they have personally profited from funds allocated for feeding people in their jails.
The lawyers said in a news release Monday that many Alabama sheriffs exploit a state law authorizing them to personally “keep and retain” taxpayer dollars provided for feeding people in their jails, taking the position it permits them to take any amounts they do not spend on food as personal income.
“This archaic system is based on a dubious interpretation of state law that has been rejected by two different attorneys general of Alabama, who concluded that the law merely allows sheriffs to manage the money and use it for official purposes, not to line their own pockets,” Aaron Littman, a staff attorney at the Southern Center for Human Rights, said in the news release. “It also raises grave ethical concerns, invites public corruption, and creates a perverse incentive to spend as little as possible on feeding people who are in jail.”
The lawyers said they sent letters requesting copies of financial records showing how much each sheriff has kept for personal use in an effort to learn which sheriffs across the state have taken taxpayers' money from jail food funds, and by how much they have profited.
“Although certain sheriffs have responded in compliance with Alabama's open records law, 49 sheriffs have refused for nearly half a year to comply with their clear obligations to produce the records, claiming instead that these documents are personal,” the lawyers said.
“The public has a right to know whether sheriffs are meeting the basic human needs of incarcerated people in their care, or are instead filling their personal coffers,” Frank Knaack, executive director of Alabama Appleseed, said in the news release. “The Alabama Public Records Law exists so that we can hold our government accountable. Unfortunately, a number of sheriffs have decided that our public records law does not apply to them.”
The Southern Center for Human Rights has received reports from people in Alabama jails that they are being provided inadequate or unhealthy meals or food that is spoiled or contaminated, the lawyers said.
A former sheriff was held in contempt and jailed by a federal judge after he purchased half of an 18-wheeler load of corn dogs for $500 and fed them to inmates at every meal, the civil rights groups said. They alleged some sheriffs have pocketed substantial amounts of money, although they acknowledged the amounts are unknown because the sheriffs are not required to report the income on state financial disclosure forms.
“One sheriff who did make such a report took more than $250,000 in 'compensation' from 'food provisions' in both 2016 and 2015, the lawyers said. “Another sheriff was held in contempt of a federal court in 2017 after removing $160,000 from the jail food account and investing it in a used car dealership.”
The lawsuit was filed in Hale County Circuit Court. The organizations, represented by attorneys at the Southern Center for Human Rights and Jake Watson and Rebekah Keith McKinney of Huntsville, seek an order from the court that the records they have requested are public and that the defendant sheriffs must produce them. They have requested that their suit be consolidated with a related case filed by Sheriff Kenneth Ellis which is currently pending before the same court and involves the same question of public access to information about how sheriffs profit from jail food funds.
A spokesman for Attorney General Steve Marshall said by email Monday, “In response to your inquiry today concerning a contact for Alabama sheriffs, the Alabama Attorney General's Office does not speak for the state's sheriffs. I would instead refer you to the Alabama Sheriff's Association.”
A staff member at the association said Executive Director Bobby Timmons would be the person to respond. But Timmons could not be reached.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![On The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners On The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/b4/76/3db1a19e4d638d10ee312bb5bc46/2025-top-laterals-integration-767x633.jpg)
On The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners
7 minute read![Georgia's Next Judge? Sole Candidate Shortlisted to Rise to Bench Georgia's Next Judge? Sole Candidate Shortlisted to Rise to Bench](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1e/b5/2781124b422ebb7cc232dd321e95/james-jay-crowe-jr-2-767x633.jpg)
![Justice 'Weaponization Working Group' Will Examine Officials Who Investigated Trump, US AG Bondi Says Justice 'Weaponization Working Group' Will Examine Officials Who Investigated Trump, US AG Bondi Says](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/aa/c6/cf82c06b4d7882a436520799935e/pam-bondi-2025-016-767x633.jpg)
Justice 'Weaponization Working Group' Will Examine Officials Who Investigated Trump, US AG Bondi Says
![New Atlanta Litigation Firm Breaks Away From Swift Currie New Atlanta Litigation Firm Breaks Away From Swift Currie](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/cf/2f/b8cd56764d9697ea8c49758144ae/marsh-atkinson-brantley-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250