Insurer Claims No Liability for $3M Default Judgment It Didn't Know About
Everest Indemnity said it was never told about the underlying accident, law suit or default judgment until the company it insured was hit with a $3.3 million default judgment.
January 25, 2018 at 01:52 PM
4 minute read
An insurer is fighting a client's efforts to hold it responsible for a $3.3 million default judgment, arguing it never found out about the underlying case or award until more than 2.5 years after the accident that spurred it.
A declaratory judgment action filed in the Northern District said Everest Indemnity Insurance Co. was only apprised of the case when its insured, security service contractor The Cogar Group, was hit with a garnishment action last December and notified the insurer.
Cogar's failure to notify Everest “as soon as practicable” of a covered event clears the insurer of any duty to defend or indemnify Cogar under the terms of the insurance policies, which expired in 2016.
Cogar is a Virginia-based company that provides security and related services to the U.S. military. A company representative declined to comment.
As detailed in court filings, the case began at Fort Gordon near Augusta in April 2015. An employee for a contractor was driving his company truck over a lowered security barrier into the base when a Cogar worker accidentally raised it, causing an accident that left driver Fernandez Hawkins with neck and spinal injuries.
Hawkins and his wife filed a negligence suit against Cogar and its employee, Anthony McDavid, in Richmond County Superior Court seeking damages that included $15,000 in medical bills and $30,000 in lost wages.
The suit was served on Cogar and McDavid in December 2016, Everest's complaint said. McDavid notified Cogar when he was served, but the company did not notify the insurer.
According to a default judgment order entered by Judge Daniel Craig in May 2017, neither Cogar nor McDavid answered the suit or filed any defensive pleadings. The order said Craig heard evidence and arguments on damages before awarding Hawkins $2.8 million and his wife, Terri Hawkins, $380,000.
In December, the Hawkinses filed a $3.3 million garnishment action in Gwinnett County naming Cogar's bank, PNC, as the garnishee. That included $120,752 in post-judgment interest.
Everest received notice of the garnishment on Dec. 12, the same day the Hawkinses filed a domestication of judgment action in Fairfax County, Virginia.
Everest only learned of that action on Jan.11, its complaint said. Everest issued a commercial liability policy to Cogar valid from February 2015 to February 2016 with a $1 million per-occurrence and $5 million aggregate limits, and another commercial catastrophe policy for the same time period with limits of $1 million per occurrence.
Both policies' terms included a requirement that the company immediately provide notice of any “occurrence” which could result in a claim and to “Immediately send us any demands, notices, summonses or legal papers received in connection with any claim or 'suit.'”
Even so, it said, Cogar and McDavid contend the policies provide coverage for the Hawkins' personal injury suit.
Everest's action names Cogar, McDavid and the Hawkinses as defendants and asks the court to declare it “has no obligation to defend or indemnify Cogar or Mr. McDavid in the negligence suit, the garnishment action, or the Virginia action.”
Everest's attorneys, Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial partners Nicholas Panayotopoulos and Nancy Rigby, did not have permission to comment, nor did Cogar's attorney, Swift Currie McGhee & Hires partner Thomas Ward.
Mark Williamson of Augusta's Burnside Law Firm, who filed the underlying suit, declined to comment; Decatur solo Douglas Tozzi, who is handling the garnishment for the Hawkinses, did not respond.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArt of the Settlement: Trump Attorney Reveals Strategy in ABC Lawsuit
Court Advisory Committee Inches Forward on Transparency in Litigation Financing
Nashville DA Secretly Recorded Defense Lawyers, Other Office Visitors, Probe Finds
3 minute readJudge Sounds Alarm Over Persistent Circuit Split on 'Favorable Termination' Rule
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250