Insurer Claims No Liability for $3M Default Judgment It Didn't Know About
Everest Indemnity said it was never told about the underlying accident, law suit or default judgment until the company it insured was hit with a $3.3 million default judgment.
January 25, 2018 at 01:52 PM
4 minute read
An insurer is fighting a client's efforts to hold it responsible for a $3.3 million default judgment, arguing it never found out about the underlying case or award until more than 2.5 years after the accident that spurred it.
A declaratory judgment action filed in the Northern District said Everest Indemnity Insurance Co. was only apprised of the case when its insured, security service contractor The Cogar Group, was hit with a garnishment action last December and notified the insurer.
Cogar's failure to notify Everest “as soon as practicable” of a covered event clears the insurer of any duty to defend or indemnify Cogar under the terms of the insurance policies, which expired in 2016.
Cogar is a Virginia-based company that provides security and related services to the U.S. military. A company representative declined to comment.
As detailed in court filings, the case began at Fort Gordon near Augusta in April 2015. An employee for a contractor was driving his company truck over a lowered security barrier into the base when a Cogar worker accidentally raised it, causing an accident that left driver Fernandez Hawkins with neck and spinal injuries.
Hawkins and his wife filed a negligence suit against Cogar and its employee, Anthony McDavid, in Richmond County Superior Court seeking damages that included $15,000 in medical bills and $30,000 in lost wages.
The suit was served on Cogar and McDavid in December 2016, Everest's complaint said. McDavid notified Cogar when he was served, but the company did not notify the insurer.
According to a default judgment order entered by Judge Daniel Craig in May 2017, neither Cogar nor McDavid answered the suit or filed any defensive pleadings. The order said Craig heard evidence and arguments on damages before awarding Hawkins $2.8 million and his wife, Terri Hawkins, $380,000.
In December, the Hawkinses filed a $3.3 million garnishment action in Gwinnett County naming Cogar's bank, PNC, as the garnishee. That included $120,752 in post-judgment interest.
Everest received notice of the garnishment on Dec. 12, the same day the Hawkinses filed a domestication of judgment action in Fairfax County, Virginia.
Everest only learned of that action on Jan.11, its complaint said. Everest issued a commercial liability policy to Cogar valid from February 2015 to February 2016 with a $1 million per-occurrence and $5 million aggregate limits, and another commercial catastrophe policy for the same time period with limits of $1 million per occurrence.
Both policies' terms included a requirement that the company immediately provide notice of any “occurrence” which could result in a claim and to “Immediately send us any demands, notices, summonses or legal papers received in connection with any claim or 'suit.'”
Even so, it said, Cogar and McDavid contend the policies provide coverage for the Hawkins' personal injury suit.
Everest's action names Cogar, McDavid and the Hawkinses as defendants and asks the court to declare it “has no obligation to defend or indemnify Cogar or Mr. McDavid in the negligence suit, the garnishment action, or the Virginia action.”
Everest's attorneys, Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial partners Nicholas Panayotopoulos and Nancy Rigby, did not have permission to comment, nor did Cogar's attorney, Swift Currie McGhee & Hires partner Thomas Ward.
Mark Williamson of Augusta's Burnside Law Firm, who filed the underlying suit, declined to comment; Decatur solo Douglas Tozzi, who is handling the garnishment for the Hawkinses, did not respond.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEvidence Explained: Prevailing Attorney Outlines Successful Defense in Inmate Death Case
Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readTrial Court Had No Authority to Reopen Voir Dire After Jury Impaneled in Civil Case, State Appellate Court Rules
Trending Stories
- 1Cornell Tech Expands Law, Technology and Entrepreneurship Masters of Law Program to Part Time Format
- 2Divided Eighth Circuit Sides With GE's Timely Removal of Indemnification Action to Federal Court
- 3Former U.S. Dept. of Education Attorney Suspended for Failure to Complete CLE Credits
- 4ArentFox Schiff Adds Global Complex Litigation Partner in Los Angeles
- 5Bittensor Hackers, Accused of Stealing Over $28 Million, Face Federal Lawsuit
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250