11th Circuit Upholds Convictions in One of Nation's Largest Criminal Food Safety Prosecutions
Executives of South Georgia's now-defunct Peanut Corp. of America were convicted of perpetuating and then covering up a 2008 nationwide salmonella outbreak that sickened hundreds and killed nine.
January 26, 2018 at 02:26 PM
4 minute read
The former U.S. attorney for Georgia's Middle District says the takeaway from a decision by a federal appellate court in Atlanta upholding convictions his office secured in one of the largest criminal food safety cases in the nation's history is simple: Individual executives will be accountable for their companies' transgressions.
Former U.S. Attorney Michael Moore, now a partner at Pope McGlamry in Atlanta, said the prosecutions of Stewart Parnell, president of the now-defunct Peanut Corp. of America; Parnell's brother, Michael Parnell; and other members of his executive staff was, in the end, “about the fact that people had gotten sick and died because of pure greed.”
More than 700 people were sickened, and nine people died following a 2008 salmonella outbreak that was traced back to the company's South Georgia peanut processing plant, which sold peanut paste and other products to food producers across the country. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta estimated that as many as 20,000 people may have been stricken who did not report their symptoms to medical authorities.
More than 300 companies, including major food producers such as Kellogg's, recalled more than 4,000 separate products that included peanut paste suspected of bacterial contamination, resulting in collective losses of more than $144 million, according to evidence presented during the case.
In an unpublished opinion handed down Jan. 23, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentences of the Parnell brothers and Mary Wilkerson, the company's quality assurance director. Following a seven-week trial in 2014 , U.S. District Senior Judge Louis Sands sentenced Stewart Parnell to 28 years in prison, Michael Parnell to 20 years in prison and Wilkerson to five years in prison for their roles in perpetuating the salmonella outbreak through interstate shipments of adulterated peanut products and then covering it up.
Attorneys who defended the trio—Justin Lugar of Virginia law firm Gentry Locke for Stewart Parnell; Edward Tolley of Cook & Tolley in Athens, Georgia, for Michael Parnell; and Wilkerson's counsel, Albany attorney Thomas Ledford—could not be reached for comment.
An appellate panel that included Circuit Judges Gerald Tjoflat and Beverly Martin and Senior Judge Robert Lanier Anderson issued the unanimous ruling. According to the order, the panel rejected defense claims that the jury had secured information about the deaths linked to the outbreak, even though the fact of the deaths were withheld from the jury during the trial.
The information surfaced post-conviction after a juror gave an affidavit to Stewart Parnell's attorney claiming that some members of the jury had conducted their own out-of-court research and had learned of the deaths, which had been withheld from the jury during the trial, according to the appellate order.
The juror, identified only as Juror 34, also claimed that another juror had told her “she believed all the defendants were guilty because they had caused people to die.”' That second juror denied making the statement when questioned later by Sands, who conducted an extensive inquiry before declining to throw out the verdict.
“We recognize that several jurors testified that they were aware that the salmonella outbreak caused deaths,” the appellate panel held, and that they had been exposed to that information outside of the confines of the courtroom.
The panel added, “We cannot conclude that jurors' exposure to extrinsic evidence that the salmonella outbreak caused deaths is not prejudicial at all.”
However, the panel determined that, during the trial, the jury heard evidence regarding “the exceedingly serious nature” of the salmonella outbreak, and the indictment included language that salmonella can be life-threatening.
“In light of all of this evidence,” the panel concluded, “We cannot conclude that the exposure of several jurors to the fact that several people also died from the outbreak was highly prejudicial.”
Moore said the lesson of the Peanut Corp. prosecutions is “the message that was sent dealing with individual accountability and responsibility for corporate actions.”
“This was a real effort to make sure the public understood that corporations and individuals would not be able to buy their way out of prosecutions,” Moore said. “Companies couldn't come in and settle a case for a monetary sum when true justice demanded that somebody face incarceration.”
Stewart Parnell's record sentence for violating the US. Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act “certainly set alarm bells off in corporate boardrooms across the country,” Moore concluded. “It reminded people making decisions about corporate activities that there could be an individual price to pay when they broke the law.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Florida Law Firms Brace for Category 5 Hurricane Milton
Georgia Removed From Lawsuit Challenging Student Loan Forgiveness; Case Transferred to Missouri
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250