Supreme Court Ruling Saves Lake Lanier Marinas From $50M Tax Increase
The high-dollar decision turned on a technicality: a missed deadline.
January 31, 2018 at 03:39 PM
3 minute read
Five marina owners on Lake Lanier who saw their local tax bills jump by as much as 3,000 percent—totaling a nearly $50 million increase—will not have to pay that tab, thanks to a ruling Monday from the Georgia Supreme Court. But, the high-dollar case turned on a technicality.
The Hall County Board of Tax Assessors failed to follow state law in scheduling a settlement conference within 45 days of receiving the marinas' notice of appeal, Justice Michael Boggs wrote in a unanimous opinion.
Boggs dispensed with an argument from the board's lawyers, who said the law divests superior courts of their authority. “We disagree,” Boggs wrote in an 18-page opinion. “The requirements imposed by the Act do not remove a case from the jurisdiction of the superior court. Rather, they are part of an administrative procedure that, like many others, imposes threshold conditions before the appeal reaches the jurisdiction of the superior court.”
The decision enforced new rules for an ad valorem tax that went into effect in January 2016. Boggs said a new law “does not change this long-standing administrative process, but simply provides for additional requirements to be met, by both the Board and the taxpayer.”
The Hall County Board of Tax Assessors was represented by Joseph Homans of Fox, Chandler, Homans, Hicks & Mckinnon in Dawsonville.
The marinas' attorneys are J. Ethan Underwood and Lauren Giles of Miles Hansford & Tallant in Cumming.
“We're obviously pleased. This is the result our clients wanted,” Underwood said. But because the decision only addresses procedural questions, the underlying issue of how to tax the docks and other improvements to the lake front property still have to be addressed this year. Conversations about that are in progress, he said.
According to the court, the five marinas lease shoreline property on Lake Lanier from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. All five have added, and own, improvements to the marinas such as docks, swim platforms, bathhouses, restaurants and stores, which Hall County assesses for ad valorem taxation. In 2015 the county recalibrated its assessments. The docks and additions previously had been valued and taxed separately as personal property, like automobiles. After the change, they were included within the value of the companies' leasehold interest and taxed as attachments to the realty.
Here's what the marina owners saw when they opened the tax bills in question, according to the court:
- Westrec Properties' tax bill jumped from $161,383 to $4.9 million, nearly a 3,000 percent increase;
- PS Recreational Properties' bill rose from $1.26 million to $24.5 million, a more than a 1,800 percent increase;
- Chattahoochee Parks' bill rose from $396,751 to $13.2 million, more than a 3,200 percent increase;
- March First's bill rose from $845,188 to $4.3 million, more than a 400 percent increase;
- AMP III-Lazy Days' bill rose from $1.23 million to $5.5 million, nearly a 350 percent increase.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Atlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250