Alabama Lawmakers Delay Vote on Compensation to Freed Death Row Inmate
The state finance department and attorney general's office argue over whether man freed in 2015 after spending 28 years on death row was proven innocent.
February 01, 2018 at 02:00 PM
3 minute read
An Alabama Senate committee on Wednesday delayed a vote on whether to award compensation to a man freed after spending nearly three decades on death row.
That delay came as the state finance department and attorney general's office argued over whether he was never proven innocent.
Sen. Paul Bussman, R-Cullman, has proposed legislation to grant Anthony Ray Hinton $1.5 million over three years. Hinton was freed in 2015 after spending 28 years on death row for two 1985 murders that occurred during separate robberies of fast-food restaurants in Birmingham.
Crime scene bullets were the key physical evidence that prosecutors said linked Hinton to the scenes. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Hinton's defense was so deficient that it was unconstitutional. Prosecutors dropped plans for a second trial when state forensic experts couldn't link crime scene bullets to a gun found in Hinton's home.
Bussman said the state system, which appointed Hinton's lawyer, did not work fairly. He said he was also concerned that Hinton has been unable to get money through an existing process to compensate the wrongly incarcerated.
“I'm very concerned that people in the state of Alabama who are low-income or of poverty level, they do not get the same judicial care even though justice is supposed to be blind. If you don't have a good lawyer, you are going to be [in] trouble,” Bussman said.
Senators, in delaying the bill, said they wanted to defer to a separate process for providing money to the wrongfully incarcerated. However, the state Finance Department has opposed giving any money to Hinton.
A Finance Department lawyer wrote in a Jan. 22 email to legislators that Hinton's conviction was vacated because of ineffective counsel, and not “due to innocence,” so their conclusion is that “Mr. Hinton is ineligible for compensation.”
The state attorney general's office argued Wednesday that Hinton was not exonerated.
“To say that Mr. Hinton was exonerated is a gross exaggeration of the facts of this case,” Deputy Attorney General James Roy Houts told the committee Wednesday. Houts said the ballistic testing was inconclusive.
Bussman countered that Hinton is presumed innocent under law.
“The way I understand America, and the way I understand Alabama, is you are innocent until proven guilty. And when you are not proven guilty, you are innocent,” Bussman said.
Finance and Taxation Committee Chairman Trip Pittman said he was open to bringing the bill back if legislators feel differently after reviewing the case.
Since his release, Hinton has spent time on the speaking circuit discussing the justice system and wrongful incarceration
“They had every intention of executing me for something I didn't do,” Hinton said when he walked out of the jailhouse in 2015.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCobb County Says Over 3K Absentee Ballots Mailed Late, Just Days Before Election
2 minute readUniversity of Georgia School of Law Finds Next Dean on Its Own Faculty
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250