Alabama Lawmakers Delay Vote on Compensation to Freed Death Row Inmate
The state finance department and attorney general's office argue over whether man freed in 2015 after spending 28 years on death row was proven innocent.
February 01, 2018 at 02:00 PM
3 minute read
An Alabama Senate committee on Wednesday delayed a vote on whether to award compensation to a man freed after spending nearly three decades on death row.
That delay came as the state finance department and attorney general's office argued over whether he was never proven innocent.
Sen. Paul Bussman, R-Cullman, has proposed legislation to grant Anthony Ray Hinton $1.5 million over three years. Hinton was freed in 2015 after spending 28 years on death row for two 1985 murders that occurred during separate robberies of fast-food restaurants in Birmingham.
Crime scene bullets were the key physical evidence that prosecutors said linked Hinton to the scenes. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Hinton's defense was so deficient that it was unconstitutional. Prosecutors dropped plans for a second trial when state forensic experts couldn't link crime scene bullets to a gun found in Hinton's home.
Bussman said the state system, which appointed Hinton's lawyer, did not work fairly. He said he was also concerned that Hinton has been unable to get money through an existing process to compensate the wrongly incarcerated.
“I'm very concerned that people in the state of Alabama who are low-income or of poverty level, they do not get the same judicial care even though justice is supposed to be blind. If you don't have a good lawyer, you are going to be [in] trouble,” Bussman said.
Senators, in delaying the bill, said they wanted to defer to a separate process for providing money to the wrongfully incarcerated. However, the state Finance Department has opposed giving any money to Hinton.
A Finance Department lawyer wrote in a Jan. 22 email to legislators that Hinton's conviction was vacated because of ineffective counsel, and not “due to innocence,” so their conclusion is that “Mr. Hinton is ineligible for compensation.”
The state attorney general's office argued Wednesday that Hinton was not exonerated.
“To say that Mr. Hinton was exonerated is a gross exaggeration of the facts of this case,” Deputy Attorney General James Roy Houts told the committee Wednesday. Houts said the ballistic testing was inconclusive.
Bussman countered that Hinton is presumed innocent under law.
“The way I understand America, and the way I understand Alabama, is you are innocent until proven guilty. And when you are not proven guilty, you are innocent,” Bussman said.
Finance and Taxation Committee Chairman Trip Pittman said he was open to bringing the bill back if legislators feel differently after reviewing the case.
Since his release, Hinton has spent time on the speaking circuit discussing the justice system and wrongful incarceration
“They had every intention of executing me for something I didn't do,” Hinton said when he walked out of the jailhouse in 2015.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEvidence Explained: Prevailing Attorney Outlines Successful Defense in Inmate Death Case
Trending Stories
- 1How This Dark Horse Firm Became a Major Player in China
- 2Bar Commission Drops Case Against Paxton—But He Wants More
- 3Pardons and Acceptance: Take It or Leave It?
- 4Gibbons Reps Asylum Seekers in $6M Suit Over 2018 ‘Inhumane’ Immigration Policy
- 5DC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250