Campaign Finance Reports Reveal a Twist in Race for Court of Appeals
Doing the math on campaign finance reports makes the numbers look different than the way they first appear.
February 14, 2018 at 02:40 PM
3 minute read
A deeper look into the most recent campaign finance disclosures reveals some surprising twists in the one real statewide contest to emerge thus far for the judicial election season—the battle between two lawyers named Ken for an open seat on the Georgia Court of Appeals.
On first blush, the reports filed last week showed personal injury and past State Bar of Georgia president Kenneth Shigley leading on the money, with $519,000 raised and $441,000 in cash on hand.
But Shigley's total included a $250,000 loan he made to his own campaign on Jan. 31, just before the end of the grace period for filing 2017 reports. After accounting for the loan, Shigley had $269,000 in donations.
Meanwhile, trial lawyer, former Dougherty County district attorney and state bar president-elect Kenneth Hodges III reported $330,500 raised, with no loans.
Both candidates discussed the reports and the campaign in conversations with the Daily Report this week.
“I enjoy everything except fundraising,” Shigley said. “I would rather take a whipping with my daddy's belt—and the lecture to go with it—than call my friends and ask for money. That's one of the reasons I sat down and wrote a check to the campaign.”
Shigley said if he wins and has the chance to hold a debt repayment fundraiser, he'll pay himself back. If he loses, he figured he won't be able to repay the loan. “I'll cross that bridge when I come to it,” he said.
For his part, Hodges said he doesn't particularly love fundraising. But he has enjoyed the chance to reconnect with old friends and catch up on visiting. He spoke as he walked in to a campaign event in Thomasville Tuesday evening, after other events in Moultrie during the day. Later he planned to return home to Albany, then fly back to Atlanta for work Wednesday. He has law offices in Atlanta and Albany. Next week, he has dates booked in North Georgia.
Hodges said he finds that, once friends make a donation, they pledge to share his information with their own contacts.
Shigley said one of the challenges is reminding people that nonpartisan judicial elections are early—the same day as the primary—and not later in the year with the general election. The state changed the schedule a few years ago to allow newly elected judges more time to wrap up their law practices and prepare to take the bench.
“I've had people say they'll vote for me in November,” Shigley said. He has to point out that the election is May 22.
They are running for the job left open by Court of Appeals Judge John Ellington, who is running instead for the vacancy on the Georgia Supreme Court created by Justice Carol Hunstein's planned retirement at the end of the year. Ellington has no announced competition for the high court.
Also filing campaign finance reports without competition are the other judges and justices up for election on the two appeals courts. But qualifying doesn't officially begin until March, so there could still be a surprise before the judicial election season is over.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Atlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Trending Stories
- 1Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 2Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 3Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
- 4De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
- 5Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250