Children Win $6.48M in Brantley County for Mom's Shotgun Death
Following a one-day bench trial, Judge Kelly Brooks set damages for $5.97 million for wrongful death and $510,000 for suffering before the mother died at a Waycross hospital a few hours after being shot in the community of Hickox, 4 miles from Nahunta (pop. 1,000).
February 21, 2018 at 10:21 AM
4 minute read
Maura Steedley was 18 and the mother of two children—ages 1 and 2—when she was killed by a shotgun blast in a rural southeast Georgia trailer park nearly nine years ago.
Those children—now 9 and 11—won a $6.48 million judgment Friday in Brantley County Superior Court.
Following a one-day bench trial, Judge Kelly Brooks set damages for $5.97 million for wrongful death and $510,000 for suffering before Steedley died at a Waycross hospital a few hours after being shot in the community of Hickox, 4 miles from the 1,000 population town of Nahunta.
The children's lawyers from Savage Turner Durham Pinckney & Savage in Savannah said they hoped the verdict would offer a sense of justice.
That may be all, though. The judge assessed 90 percent of the verdict against a teenager who was handling the gun when it fired, hitting Steedley in the side with buckshot. She had just asked him to move it because she thought it was dangerous. It had been standing inside a tire rim leaning against the wall in the corner.
“Like you would place your umbrella,” said Zachary Sprouse of Savage Turner. Sprouse and another associate, Sam Mikell, tried the case with the firm's co-founder, Brent Savage.
The judge apportioned the other 10 percent to the woman who was leasing the mobile home and who had allowed Steedley to stay there. Neither she nor the teenager were represented by counsel at the bench trial, although they both testified that the shooting was accidental, Sprouse said. And neither had insurance or assets that the lawyers have identified as resources to pay the judgment.
From a financial standpoint, the turning point in the case came three years ago when the Georgia Court of Appeals upheld the trial judge in granting summary judgment to the owner of Magnolia Trailer Park, Otis Bohanon.
“That was our most solvent defendant,” Sprouse said.
Wiley Wasden III and Travis Windsor of Brennan Wasden & Painter in Savannah successfully represented the trailer park owner. They could not be reached for comment immediately on the verdict.
In 2015, Court of Appeals Judge John Ellington ruled that the trailer park owner could not be held responsible. To succeed, a premises liability action must prove the owner had a superior knowledge of a hazard and that the injured person had no knowledge, Ellington wrote, with the agreement of then-Chief Judge Herbert Phipps and Judge Carla McMillian.
“A jury might conclude that a loaded shotgun left leaning against the wall in a teenager's bedroom is a hazard, but there is no evidence in this case that Bohanon knew that such a condition existed,” Ellington wrote.
Sprouse said his firm decided to pursue the case to trial anyway, despite the loss of the only defendant with insurance, for the sake of the children.
“We wanted to give them something,” Sprouse said, “and allow the court to explain that Maura's life was worth something.”
The trial was the first one for both Sprouse and Mikell. Sprouse graduated from the University of South Carolina law school and passed the bar exam last year. Mikell graduated from the University of Georgia law school and passed the bar in 2016. Sprouse said they believe it might have been the biggest verdict ever in Brantley County.
The trial also offered an opportunity for gun safety education, Sprouse said. A Georgia Bureau of Investigation agent testified that a shotgun should be placed in a locked cabinet or case or at least stored out of sight.
Sprouse said the heroes of the story are the great-grandparents, who are now raising the children on a blueberry farm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'I Thank You': Attorney Leverages Daily Report Article to Turn $42K Offer Into $600K Settlement
7 minute readCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Cobb County Says Over 3K Absentee Ballots Mailed Late, Just Days Before Election
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250