Indicted Attorneys File Explosive Allegations Against Waffle House CEO
Lawyer defending Atlanta area attorneys David Cohen and John Butters and their former client—all of whom are facing criminal prosecution for violating the state's eavesdropping laws—want a jury to know about Waffle House CEO Joe Rogers' alleged prior bad acts.
February 21, 2018 at 04:44 PM
5 minute read
Armed with affidavits and a federal judge's ruling, two Atlanta-area lawyers and their former client are battling felony charges by attacking their chief accuser—Waffle House CEO Joe Rogers Jr.
In advance of a pretrial hearing Thursday, the legal team defending attorneys David Cohen, John Butters and their former client Mye Brindle have petitioned a Fulton County Superior Court judge to allow them to introduce evidence they claim shows Rogers' previous “bad acts.”
Claiming in a Feb. 16 filing that “not all is beautiful in Mr. Rogers' neighborhood,” the defense claimed the Waffle House CEO engaged in “signature sexual-related crimes” with a former employee, allegations mirroring those of Brindle—Rogers' longtime former housekeeper.
The motion also said Rogers obstructed justice in order to hide his misdeeds and punish his accusers. It also accused him of having “bribed witnesses and attempted to suborn perjury.”
“This is Mr. Rogers' pattern and practice,” the motion alleges. “Mr. Rogers will stop at nothing in order to win the litigation.”
Cohen, Butters and Brindle are scheduled to go to trial in April on charges that they violated the state's eavesdropping and surveillance law after Brindle secretly videotaped a sexual liaison with Rogers. Brindle recorded the interlude shortly after she retained Cohen and Butters, a former Cobb County prosecutor, in June 2012.
The defense team includes Atlanta attorney Brian Steel, who is representing Cohen; Bruce Morris of Atlanta's Finestone Morris & White and Marietta attorneyJimmy Berry who are defending Butters, and Marietta lawyer Reid Thompson who is defending Brindle.
Cohen then sent a letter to Rogers accusing him of sexual harassment and sought to quietly settle Brindle's claims. The attorneys later suggested she wanted $12 million. That letter initiated what grew into a legal imbroglio involving competing civil claims, counterclaims and criminal charges in two counties and the state appellate courts.
The defense also has filed a second motion asking Fulton County Superior Court Judge Henry Newkirk to release the 2012 sex tape. That tape, which serves as the basis for the criminal charges, was sealed by judges in Cobb and Fulton counties, both of whom ruled the recording was illegal. Cobb County Superior Court Judge Robert Leonard, who later recused, ruled after viewing the tape that the sexual liaison appeared to be consensual.
Court records described the recording as depicting Rogers nude in his bathroom, shaving and then lying on his bed as Brindle manually serviced him.
On Wednesday, Rogers' lead counsel, Robert Ingram of Marietta firm Moore Ingram Johnson & Steele called the defense allegations “false.”
“Cohen, Butters and Brindle are following through on their threats made in their initial extortion letter to use illegally obtained 'video recordings' to cause 'injurious publicity' unless the matter 'resolved early and outside public litigation,'” he said. “This is an obvious effort to deflect away from their own criminal conduct.”
Citing exhibits attached to the motion, the defense claims that Rogers' testimony as the alleged victim and chief prosecution witness is suspect and that he has a documented track record of harassment that would bolster Brindle's claims.
Those exhibits include:
- An affidavit from Dawn White, who worked for Rogers as a nanny, housekeeper and part-time masseuse from 1990-1994. White said she quit her job after Rogers groped her during a massage session. She also said Rogers made sexually offensive comments that she was “probably hot and he would bet that I could suck the chrome off a trailer hitch.”
- An opinion by Chief Judge Jerry Buchmeyer, of the Northern District of Texas, that was vacated as a condition of an $8 million sexual harassment settlement between Waffle House and a former employee. In that opinion, Buchmeyer called Therese Scribner's treatment 'severe, pervasive and disgusting,” and said it was “committed, witnessed and condoned by the company's top executives,” including the CEO. The judge also called out Waffle House executives for lying, bribing at least two witnesses and attempting to suborn perjury.
- An affidavit Rogers filed in the 2002 divorce case of his current wife, Frances Maynard, from her then-husband, denying an affair that appeared to be contradicted by a private detective's surveillance report. The private detective claimed he saw Maynard and Rogers playing footsie while dining and then adjourning to a cabin where they remained for at least five hours while Maynard was still married. Rogers claimed he was misidentified and was not physically intimate with Maynard.
The defense team also claimed Rogers attempted to intimidate another former Waffle House employee, Dr. Ann Parker, who was deposed during the underlying civil litigation arising from Brindle's harassment claims. The motion claims that, after Parker testified and Maynard would have lost her divorce case if she were found to have been having an affair, she was summoned to meet with Rogers. The Waffle House CEO pressured her to change her testimony and sign a confidentiality agreement.
When she refused, Rogers allegedly threatened to make the shares of Waffle House stock she held “become valueless,” according to the motion.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSunbelt Law Firms Experienced More Moderate Growth Last Year, Alongside Some Job Cuts and Less Merger Interest
4 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250