11th Circuit Spanks Georgia Education Department
The case involves a $10.7 million grant that the U.S. Department of Education awarded to Georgia for local education entities in 2007 under the 21st Century Community Learning Centers, meant to help students at high-poverty, low-performing schools.
March 01, 2018 at 12:28 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit on Wednesday let stand an order requiring the Georgia Department of Education to repay $2 million in fraudulently spent federal grant money.
The case involves a $10.7 million grant that the U.S. Department of Education awarded to Georgia to be distributed to local education entities in 2007 under the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program, which targeted students at high-poverty, low-performing schools. The money was meant to fund academic enrichment opportunities such as after-school tutorial services, Judge Anne Conway of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation, wrote in a 16-page opinion. The appeals court upheld a final decision by the U.S. secretary of education ordering the Georgia Department of Education to repay $2.1 million.
After a “suspicious activity report” in May 2007 from a local bank, state auditors ultimately uncovered evidence of a “complex fraud scheme” involving several Georgia education department employees, as well as members of the independent external peer review panel and some of the grant recipients who manipulated the outcome of the competition, Conway said. As “a result of apparent collusion and management override of internal controls,” the auditors found the grant competition was “severely flawed.”
Attorney General Chris Carr represented the Georgia Department of Education. Carr's spokesperson said he has no comment. The Georgia Department of Education did not have an immediate response.
The U.S. Department of Education was represented by Attorney General Jeff Sessions. His spokesperson could not be reached immediately.
The department initially ordered Georgia to repay $5.7 million diverted to lower-scoring applicants who won out over higher-scoring ones because of the manipulation, Conway wrote. “The parties subsequently stipulated to the reduced amount of $2.1 million based on the relevant statute of limitations,” the judge wrote. But then Georgia appealed that award, arguing the state should be given an offset for other funds spent on similar programs.
After reviewing Georgia's argument, the panel upheld the federal department's decision to enforce the $2.1 million payback.
Conway said the U.S. secretary of education determined that the nature and scope of the violation was “too serious to warrant an equitable offset,” given that Georgia education department employees “participated in a complex fraud scheme which led to the state improperly awarding $5.7 million to seventeen subgrantees who did not qualify to receive those funds.”
“As the Secretary determined, the violations unquestionably harmed federal interests,” Conway said. “An important objective” of the grant program is to make “grant money available to properly chosen subgrantees,” she added.
Contrary to Georgia's arguments, Conway said, “We do not find the Secretary's decision to deny the equitable offset based on the nature and scope of the complex fraud scheme initiated by Petitioner's employees to be arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion.”
The case is Georgia Department of Education v. U.S. Department of Education, No. 16-17648.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAtlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
'A 58-Year-Old Engine That Needs an Overhaul': Judge Wants Traffic Law Amended
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 2Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 3Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 4Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 5Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250