11th Circuit Spanks Georgia Education Department
The case involves a $10.7 million grant that the U.S. Department of Education awarded to Georgia for local education entities in 2007 under the 21st Century Community Learning Centers, meant to help students at high-poverty, low-performing schools.
March 01, 2018 at 12:28 PM
3 minute read
![](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2018/01/Eleventh-Circuit-Court-of-Appeals-Building-Article-201801101954.jpg)
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit on Wednesday let stand an order requiring the Georgia Department of Education to repay $2 million in fraudulently spent federal grant money.
The case involves a $10.7 million grant that the U.S. Department of Education awarded to Georgia to be distributed to local education entities in 2007 under the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program, which targeted students at high-poverty, low-performing schools. The money was meant to fund academic enrichment opportunities such as after-school tutorial services, Judge Anne Conway of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation, wrote in a 16-page opinion. The appeals court upheld a final decision by the U.S. secretary of education ordering the Georgia Department of Education to repay $2.1 million.
After a “suspicious activity report” in May 2007 from a local bank, state auditors ultimately uncovered evidence of a “complex fraud scheme” involving several Georgia education department employees, as well as members of the independent external peer review panel and some of the grant recipients who manipulated the outcome of the competition, Conway said. As “a result of apparent collusion and management override of internal controls,” the auditors found the grant competition was “severely flawed.”
Attorney General Chris Carr represented the Georgia Department of Education. Carr's spokesperson said he has no comment. The Georgia Department of Education did not have an immediate response.
The U.S. Department of Education was represented by Attorney General Jeff Sessions. His spokesperson could not be reached immediately.
The department initially ordered Georgia to repay $5.7 million diverted to lower-scoring applicants who won out over higher-scoring ones because of the manipulation, Conway wrote. “The parties subsequently stipulated to the reduced amount of $2.1 million based on the relevant statute of limitations,” the judge wrote. But then Georgia appealed that award, arguing the state should be given an offset for other funds spent on similar programs.
After reviewing Georgia's argument, the panel upheld the federal department's decision to enforce the $2.1 million payback.
Conway said the U.S. secretary of education determined that the nature and scope of the violation was “too serious to warrant an equitable offset,” given that Georgia education department employees “participated in a complex fraud scheme which led to the state improperly awarding $5.7 million to seventeen subgrantees who did not qualify to receive those funds.”
“As the Secretary determined, the violations unquestionably harmed federal interests,” Conway said. “An important objective” of the grant program is to make “grant money available to properly chosen subgrantees,” she added.
Contrary to Georgia's arguments, Conway said, “We do not find the Secretary's decision to deny the equitable offset based on the nature and scope of the complex fraud scheme initiated by Petitioner's employees to be arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion.”
The case is Georgia Department of Education v. U.S. Department of Education, No. 16-17648.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![On The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners On The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/b4/76/3db1a19e4d638d10ee312bb5bc46/2025-top-laterals-integration-767x633.jpg)
On The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners
7 minute read![Georgia's Next Judge? Sole Candidate Shortlisted to Rise to Bench Georgia's Next Judge? Sole Candidate Shortlisted to Rise to Bench](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1e/b5/2781124b422ebb7cc232dd321e95/james-jay-crowe-jr-2-767x633.jpg)
![Justice 'Weaponization Working Group' Will Examine Officials Who Investigated Trump, US AG Bondi Says Justice 'Weaponization Working Group' Will Examine Officials Who Investigated Trump, US AG Bondi Says](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/aa/c6/cf82c06b4d7882a436520799935e/pam-bondi-2025-016-767x633.jpg)
Justice 'Weaponization Working Group' Will Examine Officials Who Investigated Trump, US AG Bondi Says
![New Atlanta Litigation Firm Breaks Away From Swift Currie New Atlanta Litigation Firm Breaks Away From Swift Currie](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/cf/2f/b8cd56764d9697ea8c49758144ae/marsh-atkinson-brantley-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250