Chief Judge, 'Dumbfounded' at Math Error, Takes Back Request for Bench Expansion
“This is what happened,” Cobb County Clerk of Superior Court Rebecca Keaton said Thursday. “By a fluke, we discovered that the numbers are off by maybe a third—inflated by 30 percent.”
March 01, 2018 at 05:13 PM
4 minute read
Cobb County Superior Court Chief Judge C. LaTain Kell is in the unusual position of having to walk back plans to expand his bench. It turns out that the judges in Marietta are not quite as busy as he thought.
With legislation funding a new judicial position for his court halfway through the Georgia General Assembly, Kell learned that the supporting evidence for the need was based on faulty math.
“We're shocked to say the least,” Kell said in an email Wednesday evening. “I was dumbfounded.”
Kell said Wednesday night and again in a phone interview Thursday that he has withdrawn his request to the Georgia Legislature for an additional judge because of the inaccuracy. The clerk's office had miscounted, leading to a faulty workload analysis by the statewide entity that oversees the business of the courts, Kell said.
The business of adding new superior court judges in Georgia requires levels of approval and that a workload analysis be done by the Georgia Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC). The numbers used in the analysis are supplied each year, around this time, by the clerks of court, who have separate departments from the judges and who are constitutional officers elected by the voters.
“This is what happened,” Cobb County Clerk of Superior Court Rebecca Keaton said Thursday. “By a fluke, we discovered that the numbers are off by maybe a third—inflated by 30 percent.”
Keaton said a longtime employee in her office had been generating the report for many years. That person left last year. This year, others had to gather the numbers. They found a discrepancy. It seemed the old reports had been based on the number of criminal charges rather than the number of individual defendants. So the case counts were higher than they should have been, Keaton said.
Keaton said she contacted the AOC and was directed to review past years' reports. Those were even more inflated, she said.
“The judges didn't do anything wrong,” Keaton said. “It's my office that made a mistake.”
But, Keaton added, “When you make a mistake, you correct it.”
Based on that flawed workload report, the Judicial Council of Georgia unanimously approved a request for an additional judge for the Cobb County Superior Court last August. The council is made up of 27 members who are judges of appellate and trial courts at all levels, plus a representative of the State Bar of Georgia. Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice P. Harris Hines—a former Cobb County judge himself—chairs the council as part of his leadership responsibilities for the high court.
State Sen. Lindsey Tippins, R-Marietta, and others sponsored a bill funding the new Cobb County judge. The Senate approved the bill last week and sent it on to the House of Representatives.
“We had been assured it was going to pass,” Kell said.
AOC Director Cynthia Clanton sent a notice Wednesday to the members of the Judicial Council of Georgia saying that, based on new numbers provided by Keaton, “it appears that the Cobb Judicial Circuit would no longer qualify for an additional judge, contrary to the recommendations of the Judicial Workload Assessment Committee.”
Clanton confirmed the decision to withdraw the request pending in the Legislature.
Clanton said her staff is working with Kell and Keaton “to ensure future caseload data is accurate prior to its submission for analysis.”
Both Kell and Keaton agreed the episode underscores the need for a case management system that different departments and courts statewide can use to access documents and data. Hines mentioned that plan in his State of the Judiciary address last month, telling the General Assembly that such a system is under development.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readOn The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 2GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 3Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 4Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 5FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250