Equifax Finds 2017 Hack Compromised Data of 2.4 Million More Consumers
Equifax on Thursday expanded the number of consumers whose financial data and personal information have been compromised to a breathtaking 148 million.
March 01, 2018 at 01:43 PM
3 minute read
Equifax on Thursday expanded for the second time its estimate of the number of consumers impacted by its 2017 massive data breach.
The Atlanta-based credit bureau announced that it has now confirmed the identities of an additional 2.4 million U.S. consumers whose names and partial driver's license information were stolen by hackers who penetrated Equifax's firewalls sometime last year.
The company also noted that its forensic experts had determined that the hackers were primarily focused on stealing Social Security numbers.
Equifax's new revelation brings the total of consumers potentially affected by the hack to 148 million.
Equifax did not discover the hack until July 2017 and did not notify the public until September of that year.
Equifax initially announced that 143 million consumers whose financial data and personal identifying information the credit bureau had stockpiled was potentially compromised. Equifax later increased that number to 145.5 million.
In a news release issued Thursday morning, Equifax said the additional compromised consumers were uncovered during a forensic examination of the company's databases. They were not included in the original population of those affected because Equifax data did not include consumers' home addresses and drivers' license information was incomplete.
“This is not about newly discovered stolen data,” Equifax interim CEO Paulino do Rego Barros Jr. said in a written statement included in the release. “It's about sifting through the previously identified stolen data, analyzing other information in our databases that was not taken by the attackers, and making connections that enabled us to identify additional individuals.”
Equifax said it intended to notify the newly identified consumers and will offer identity theft protection and credit monitoring services at no cost.
Equifax also claimed the company's' forensic experts had found “no evidence” that Equifax's core consumer, employment and income or commercial credit reporting databases were accessed by hackers.
Meanwhile, more than 300 proposed class action suits have been filed on behalf of individual consumers, financial institutions and businesses that may have been impacted by the data breach. Those suits have been consolidated in pending multidistrict litigation in U.S. District Court in Atlanta.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Cradle to Grave': Children's Clothing Company Carter's Sued in Digital Privacy Class Action
Hall Booth Smith Experiences Data Breach—Here's What You Need to Know to Protect Your Firm's Data
Georgia Lawyers Speak at Conference Session Focusing on Rise of Collaboration Apps
4 minute readCould ChatGPT Soon Find Itself in Data Privacy Regulators' Crosshairs?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250