Jury Awards Nothing to Man Injured in Deer Stand Mishap
A trio of hunters who attempted to erect a newly purchased, floor model deer stand sold without a manual failed to seek out instructions on its use. When it began to fall as one climbed up, he leaped off and shattered his leg.
March 02, 2018 at 06:39 PM
5 minute read
A federal jury agreed that one of two defendants was negligent in causing an accident that left a hunter with a shattered leg after a fall from an improperly erected deer stand, but decided the injured man assumed the risk of climbing it and awarded him nothing.
Hall Booth Smith partner Jeffery Saxby, who with associate Wayne Satterfield represented the company that sold the 16-foot stand to the retailer, said the last plaintiff's demand to settle the case before trial was for $750,000.
The only defense offer to settle was for $2,000 or $2,500 in 2015, said Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith partner Brantley Rowlen, who represented the retailer along with associate V. Ashley Waller.
Plaintiffs attorney Steven Pickens of Lawrenceville's Mahaffey Pickens Tucker said he will file an appeal.
“We thought we presented a compelling case and that it might go our way,” said Pickens in an email. “Mr. Rowlen and Mr. Saxby are both skilled advocates and did excellent jobs for their clients.”
According to the lawyers and trial documents, plaintiff Daniel Roberts and two friends were hunting one weekend in North Georgia and decided to go buy another deer stand.
One of the men, Lee Summey, went to the Tractor Supply Co. in Chatsworth, but they only had a display model left.
Summey bought the display stand, which did not have a box, manual or other instructions and returned to his friends in the woods.
“Summey told them he didn't have the manual,” said Saxby. “They went ahead and completed the assembly the way they thought was correct.”
The stand included two “criss-cross” nylon straps that were supposed to be used to secure it to a tree, but the men didn't know how to attach them, he said.
“They used one as a brace and left the other off completely,” he said.
The trio raised the stand against a tree with one holding the ladder and the other holding a stabilizer bar while Roberts climbed up.
“When he got past a certain point, the top of the stand began to pull away from the tree,” said Saxby. “Our plaintiff jumped off—probably about 8 feet off the ground—and shattered the bones in one leg.”
According to his filings, the bones in Roberts' right leg snapped below the knee and “tore through his skin.”
Roberts, whom Saxby said is in his 40s, underwent two surgeries, was out of work for three months and is likely to need another surgery to remove the hardware.
There was no evidence alcohol was involved, Saxby said.
Roberts filed negligence claims in 2014 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia against Tractor Supply Co. and New Buffalo Corp., which imported the tree stand and sold it to the store.
Trial began Feb. 20 before Judge Richard Story.
According to plaintiff's pleadings, New Buffalo was negligent in marketing a product when it knew the instruction manual might be lost and for not having the straps affixed to the top of the stand.
Tractor Supply was accused of negligently selling the stand without the instructions or warning that the straps had to be affixed to the stand to prevent an accident.
Defense pleadings say New Buffalo simply imported the stand and sold it and had nothing to do with its design or manufacture.
Tractor Supply argued the instruction manual was easily available on its website and noted that—two weeks after the accident—Summey and the other man watched a demonstration on YouTube and were able to assemble and use the stand without any problem.
The retailer also said Roberts ignored warning labels affixed to the tree stand instructing users to follow the assembly instructions.
Both defendants argued Roberts assumed the risk of climbing the tree stand and was responsible for his own injuries.
The plaintiffs brought in Marietta accident investigation specialist Jeff Hyatt to testify, Saxby said.
“Even he testified that, if used in accordance with the manual, the stand is fit for use,” he said.
The defense did not call any experts to testify, he said.
Rowan said the defendants were essentially united at trial.
“It was pretty cordial,” he said. “The plaintiffs had a manufacturing defect claim they abandoned midtrial, so that made it straight negligence for both of us. But there wasn't any finger-pointing; everybody was pretty united in the knowledge that, when these gentlemen took on this project, they assumed the risk.”
Saxby said Roberts claimed damages for roughly $124,000, which included about $90,000 in past medical bills, plus additional funds for the expected future surgery, and $24,000 in lost wages.
At closing, he said, Pickens didn't ask for a particular figure but “sort of hinted around $2 million in damages and pain and suffering.”
After a weeklong trial, the jury took about six hours to deliver a defense verdict.
The jury foreman told Saxby they decided about 15 minutes into deliberations that his client, the importer, had no liability.
“They found that Tractor Supply was negligent but that Roberts had assumed the risk of injury,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEvidence Explained: Prevailing Attorney Outlines Successful Defense in Inmate Death Case
Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readTrial Court Had No Authority to Reopen Voir Dire After Jury Impaneled in Civil Case, State Appellate Court Rules
Trending Stories
- 1Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 2Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 3Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 4Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 5Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250