Jury Awards Nothing to Man Injured in Deer Stand Mishap
A trio of hunters who attempted to erect a newly purchased, floor model deer stand sold without a manual failed to seek out instructions on its use. When it began to fall as one climbed up, he leaped off and shattered his leg.
March 02, 2018 at 06:39 PM
5 minute read
A federal jury agreed that one of two defendants was negligent in causing an accident that left a hunter with a shattered leg after a fall from an improperly erected deer stand, but decided the injured man assumed the risk of climbing it and awarded him nothing.
Hall Booth Smith partner Jeffery Saxby, who with associate Wayne Satterfield represented the company that sold the 16-foot stand to the retailer, said the last plaintiff's demand to settle the case before trial was for $750,000.
The only defense offer to settle was for $2,000 or $2,500 in 2015, said Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith partner Brantley Rowlen, who represented the retailer along with associate V. Ashley Waller.
Plaintiffs attorney Steven Pickens of Lawrenceville's Mahaffey Pickens Tucker said he will file an appeal.
“We thought we presented a compelling case and that it might go our way,” said Pickens in an email. “Mr. Rowlen and Mr. Saxby are both skilled advocates and did excellent jobs for their clients.”
According to the lawyers and trial documents, plaintiff Daniel Roberts and two friends were hunting one weekend in North Georgia and decided to go buy another deer stand.
One of the men, Lee Summey, went to the Tractor Supply Co. in Chatsworth, but they only had a display model left.
Summey bought the display stand, which did not have a box, manual or other instructions and returned to his friends in the woods.
“Summey told them he didn't have the manual,” said Saxby. “They went ahead and completed the assembly the way they thought was correct.”
The stand included two “criss-cross” nylon straps that were supposed to be used to secure it to a tree, but the men didn't know how to attach them, he said.
“They used one as a brace and left the other off completely,” he said.
The trio raised the stand against a tree with one holding the ladder and the other holding a stabilizer bar while Roberts climbed up.
“When he got past a certain point, the top of the stand began to pull away from the tree,” said Saxby. “Our plaintiff jumped off—probably about 8 feet off the ground—and shattered the bones in one leg.”
According to his filings, the bones in Roberts' right leg snapped below the knee and “tore through his skin.”
Roberts, whom Saxby said is in his 40s, underwent two surgeries, was out of work for three months and is likely to need another surgery to remove the hardware.
There was no evidence alcohol was involved, Saxby said.
Roberts filed negligence claims in 2014 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia against Tractor Supply Co. and New Buffalo Corp., which imported the tree stand and sold it to the store.
Trial began Feb. 20 before Judge Richard Story.
According to plaintiff's pleadings, New Buffalo was negligent in marketing a product when it knew the instruction manual might be lost and for not having the straps affixed to the top of the stand.
Tractor Supply was accused of negligently selling the stand without the instructions or warning that the straps had to be affixed to the stand to prevent an accident.
Defense pleadings say New Buffalo simply imported the stand and sold it and had nothing to do with its design or manufacture.
Tractor Supply argued the instruction manual was easily available on its website and noted that—two weeks after the accident—Summey and the other man watched a demonstration on YouTube and were able to assemble and use the stand without any problem.
The retailer also said Roberts ignored warning labels affixed to the tree stand instructing users to follow the assembly instructions.
Both defendants argued Roberts assumed the risk of climbing the tree stand and was responsible for his own injuries.
The plaintiffs brought in Marietta accident investigation specialist Jeff Hyatt to testify, Saxby said.
“Even he testified that, if used in accordance with the manual, the stand is fit for use,” he said.
The defense did not call any experts to testify, he said.
Rowan said the defendants were essentially united at trial.
“It was pretty cordial,” he said. “The plaintiffs had a manufacturing defect claim they abandoned midtrial, so that made it straight negligence for both of us. But there wasn't any finger-pointing; everybody was pretty united in the knowledge that, when these gentlemen took on this project, they assumed the risk.”
Saxby said Roberts claimed damages for roughly $124,000, which included about $90,000 in past medical bills, plus additional funds for the expected future surgery, and $24,000 in lost wages.
At closing, he said, Pickens didn't ask for a particular figure but “sort of hinted around $2 million in damages and pain and suffering.”
After a weeklong trial, the jury took about six hours to deliver a defense verdict.
The jury foreman told Saxby they decided about 15 minutes into deliberations that his client, the importer, had no liability.
“They found that Tractor Supply was negligent but that Roberts had assumed the risk of injury,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt Advisory Committee Inches Forward on Transparency in Litigation Financing
Nashville DA Secretly Recorded Defense Lawyers, Other Office Visitors, Probe Finds
3 minute readJudge Sounds Alarm Over Persistent Circuit Split on 'Favorable Termination' Rule
Retired US Judge, Ethics Experts Ask 11th Circuit to Reassign Trump Classified Docs Case
Trending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250