Prospective Jurors Undergo Questioning as McIver Murder Trial Opens
Questions for prospective jurors, who will determine the fate of former Fisher & Phillips partner Tex McIver, suggest narrative as his murder trial over the shooting death of his wife gets underway.
March 05, 2018 at 07:08 PM
5 minute read
As jury selection got underway in the murder trial of Atlanta attorney Claud “Tex” McIver Monday, questions that county prosecutors and McIver's defense want to ask prospective jurors offered tantalizing hints as to how each side hopes to shape the narrative in the shooting death of his wife, Diane McIver.
Fulton County Superior Court Chief Judge Robert McBurney said he intends to seat 12 jurors and four alternates in the murder trial of the 75-year-old former Fisher & Phillips partner. The trial is expected to last through March.
Tex McIver's defense team on Monday intimated that whether the couple was drinking heavily, McIver's combat service in Vietnam, Black Lives Matter and the relative wealth of the law partner and his executive wife all may play a role at trial. Diane McIver was president of Atlanta billboard company Corey Airport Services.
Attorneys' questions for prospective jurors also focused on whether they have ever made a 911 call and, if so, under what circumstances. Others centered on Emory University Hospital, where McIver directed his wife be taken after he shot her, foregoing three hospitals that were closer.
Neither McIver nor Dani Jo Carter—a friend who was driving the McIvers' SUV—called 911 after the shooting.
Attorneys also want to know how familiar jurors are with traffic on Atlanta's Downtown Connector, the section of I-75/I-85 which runs through the city center, and the Auburn/Edgewood Avenue exit the McIvers took on Sept. 25, 2016, in the minutes prior to the shooting.
The answers to those questions may signal how credible jurors find Tex McIver's explanation of the circumstances surrounding the shooting. McIver has never denied shooting his wife but has always insisted it was an accident. Diane McIver was shot inside the couple's SUV on their way home from a weekend at their Putnam County farm.
Tex McIver and Carter told authorities that the lawyer, who was sitting in back, asked his wife, who was in the front passenger seat, to hand him a gun he kept stored in the SUV's console after they ran into a traffic jam and exited onto a downtown Atlanta street.
Tex McIver, according to the lawyer's spokesman and Carter, asked for the gun because he allegedly feared pedestrians he spotted as they drove through the neighborhood. McIver has claimed he dozed off with the gun in his lap, only to wake when it fired several miles down the road in an upscale neighborhood directly across from Piedmont Park.
After the shooting, McIver's spokesman told news outlets that McIver wanted the gun because he feared they had rolled into a Black Lives Matter protest—a statement his lawyer at the time, Decatur attorney Stephen Maples, later attempted to retract. The day before the shooting, a Black Lives Matter protest held as part of a national effort by the organization to target majority-white businesses for nearly five hours blocked Peachtree Road at Lenox Square mall, which is near where the McIvers lived.
“There's going to be a focus on Black Lives Matter. There's going to be a focus on protests,” Atlanta attorney Bruce Harvey said Monday. Harvey has teamed up with Don Samuel of Atlanta's Garland, Samuel & Loeb to defend McIver. The judge said he intends to ask jurors whether anyone followed Black Lives Matter, ever attended a protest, supported the organization or donated money to it.
McBurney said he also intends to ask if prospective jurors own a gun or have a gun in the household. Harvey also wants to know whether any juror kept a gun in their car. He also said the defense wants to know if any juror has been present when a gun was accidentally fired.
Harvey also wants to know if any jurors are veterans.
Nothing so far has surfaced in McIver's defense about his service in Vietnam and whether his combat experience had any influence on his habit of keeping multiple guns around and, according to witnesses at pretrial hearings, his tendency to brandish them.
Harvey also asked McBurney if he would query jurors about whether they drink or have any objections to drinking.
“I know alcohol is going to be a factor in this case,” he said.
Prior to the shooting, the lawyer said, McIver, his wife, Carter and a friend had dinner at a suburban steakhouse where they ordered wine at the bar and then a bottle at dinner. Harvey said that, according to a toxicology report, Diane McIver's blood alcohol content was 0.18 percent when she died. People with a blood alcohol content of 0.08 percent or greater are considered too impaired to legally drive.
Harvey also said there was a container of wine in the SUV in a Yeti cup that he said was passed back and forth during the trip home.
The defense attorney also wants to determine whether any jurors “have the idea that people of means get treated differently in the criminal justice system, whether they have a persistent belief that is true.”
“This case is going to involve, as I understand it, extensive testimony and documentation about the relative wealth of the parties in this case,” he said. It's “very important” the defense to know if jurors believe that people like McIver “are treated differently than anyone else by the system,” he added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 2Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
- 3'America's Next Top Model' Contestant Says Ye Assaulted Her
- 4LexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
- 5'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250