Jury Seated in Tex McIver Murder Case
Opening statements are slated to begin Tueday after Fulton County prosecutors and Atlanta attorney Claud "Tex" McIver's defense team spent more than a week questioning prospective jurors.
March 12, 2018 at 04:49 PM
3 minute read
Fulton County prosecutors and Atlanta attorney Claud “Tex” McIver's legal team on Monday selected the jury that will hear the murder case against McIver over the 2016 shooting death of his wife.
Attorneys selected a 12-member jury panel and four alternates. The 12 panelists are evenly split between women and men, with nine whites and three African-Americans.
Opening statements in the case will be Tuesday.
Attorneys selected the jury after more than a week questioning dozens of prospective jurors. A number of prospects were dismissed last week after they said they had prejudged the case and would not be able to set aside their bias that McIver had intentionally killed his wife, Diane, when he fired his gun from the back seat of their SUV as the couple was being driven through downtown Atlanta by a longtime friend.
McIver, 75, who retired from Atlanta's Fisher & Phillips, claims the shooting was an accident, but three months later, he was charged with felony manslaughter. That charge later was elevated to malice murder.
Prospective jurors who were eliminated included some who said they were gun owners and were dubious of McIver's claim that his .38-caliber Smith & Wesson revolver had fired accidentally.
Questions posed to the jury provided some tantalizing hints that may be explored at the trial. They included screening jurors for bias against alcohol use because the couple may have been drinking more heavily than McIver's spokesmen had previously indicated. McIver's combat service in Vietnam and his wealth as compared to that of his wife—who was president of Atlanta billboard company Corey Airport Services—may also play a role at trial.
Prospects also were asked about whether they had ever supported Black Lives Matter, attended protests, contributed money or posted supportive yard signs. Shortly after Diane McIver was shot, her husband's spokesman told reporters with several media organizations, including the Daily Report, that McIver had asked his wife to hand him his gun because he feared Black Lives Matter protesters, who had shut down Peachtree Road near their home for five hours the previous day. McIver's attorney later said the spokesman's references to Black Lives Matter as a reason McIver was holding a gun were incorrect.
The reference to Black Lives Matter was only one of multiple changes the lawyer and his representatives made to McIver's evolving explanation of the circumstances surrounding his wife's death.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250