ER Nurse Testifies Tex McIver Huddled With Lawyer as His Wife Was Dying
Terri Sullivan, an emergency room nurse at Emory University Hospital in Atlanta, testified that, when she learned Diane McIver had been shot, she was "suspicious there had been foul play."
March 16, 2018 at 03:49 PM
4 minute read
An emergency room nurse on duty the night Diane McIver died of a gunshot wound testified Friday that she overheard a lawyer tell the woman's husband, Atlanta attorney Claud “Tex” McIver, “This is what you're going to tell them.”
“I had the impression there was a plan being enacted,” Emory University Hospital ER nurse Terri Sullivan said. Tex McIver, a woman wearing a cowboy hat she identified as family friend Dani Jo Carter and a man carrying a legal pad that prosecutors have identified as McIver's attorney, Stephen Maples, “were kind of huddling like … a sports team, kind of holding on in a small circle,” she said.
Sullivan is the fifth Emory ER nurse to testify at Tex McIver's ongoing murder trial. The lawyer, now retired from Atlanta's Fisher & Phillips, is charged with malice murder, felony murder and multiple counts of influencing witnesses stemming from Diane McIver's shooting on Sept. 25, 2016. She died hours after McIver shot her in the couple's SUV as Carter drove them home. McIver has always said the shooting was an accident.
McIver and his representatives have given multiple explanations about how the gun went off, including that McIver had apparently fallen asleep, that the gun discharged when the SUV hit a bump in the road, even though it was stopped at a traffic light, and that he just didn't remember.
Prosecutors claim he had a financial motive.
Sullivan testified Friday that Emory ER personnel, herself included, were suspicious of the circumstances surrounding the shooting, which allegedly occurred on Piedmont Avenue near 12th Street.
Sullivan said she was so concerned about what she overheard that she asked another nurse to keep tabs on the group “to see what she could hear either to corroborate what I had heard or to see further whether there was an inappropriate discussion going on.”
Sullivan said that, after Diane McIver died in the hospital early on Sept. 26, 2016, Tex McIver checked into the ER, complaining of an anxiety attack. Sullivan, who treated him, said Tex McIver did not appear dazed.
She described him as “calm and cooperative. … He was speaking in a very calm manner. He was not crying. There were no tears.”
McIver told her he needed “something to help me cope,” Sullivan said. His wife, he explained, “had died unexpectedly.”
In listing chronic medical conditions, McIver, she said, never mentioned he had a sleep disorder or that he occasionally suffered from amnesia. Within an hour of being triaged and seen by an ER physician, McIver was dismissed with one tablet of Ativan, an anti-anxiety drug, and four tabs of Xanax.
But, while Diane McIver was being treated, ER personnel were already comparing her husband to O.J. Simpson—who was charged and later acquitted of murder in a sensational trial in the mid-1990s for the death of his wife, Nicole, and a male friend.
“We were all just feeling such a sense of shock,” Sullivan said. “Some of us were angry that clearly someone had shot her and clearly it was an unfair situation.”
“People were talking about it because … he was a high-profile person with a lot of money,” Sullivan testified
Sullivan also confirmed she told prosecutors “Nobody with a gunshot would ever come to Emory.” Emory is not a trauma center and would divert ambulances with gunshot victims either to Grady Memorial Hospital or Atlanta Medical Center in downtown Atlanta, she added.
Both hospitals were closer to the street near Piedmont Park where Diane McIver was shot than Emory, where Tex McIver directed Carter to take his wife.
“I thought it was suspicious that a gunshot would come to Emory, yes,” Sullivan said. “When I saw the group huddled around, [and heard] 'This is what you're going to tell them,' then I started to be suspicious there was significant foul play … that there was something amiss.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Election-Interference Prosecution Appears on Course to Wind Down
4 minute readJudge Sets Early 2025 Trial for Ex-Prosecutor Charged With Meddling in Ahmaud Arbery Investigation
3 minute readRapper Young Thug Is a Free Man. Here Are Things to Know About His Plea.
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250