Report Says Atlanta Billing Rates Grew Faster, But Fees Still Lag Top Markets
Georgia partners bill at a median of $340 an hour, according to data compiled by CounselLink, but rates vary widely by practice. (See below for separate data on Georgia billing rates.)
March 16, 2018 at 04:33 PM
4 minute read
Atlanta firms overall enjoyed healthy billing rate growth last year, with hourly rates up more than 5 percent, according to data derived from 1.7 million matters totaling $30 billion that were tracked by CounselLink, a LexisNexis subsidiary.
That's up from a 2 percent hourly growth rate in 2016 for Atlanta attorneys in CounselLink's database.
CounselLink also found that average billable rate growth for partners in the state of Georgia as a whole, at 5.6 percent, was higher than the national average of 3.2 percent last year.
However, the $340 median fee for Georgia partners was notably lower than in other states with top growth in partners' hourly rates: California partners charged a $500 median hourly fee (5.4 percent increase), those in Oregon charged a median hourly fee of $410 (5.5 percent increase), and in Minnesota the median hourly partner rate was $400 (6.1 percent increase).
The CounselLink data did not break out median fees by city. However, more than half of the lawyers practicing in Georgia are in metro Atlanta.
Cities with the highest hourly rate growth last year were New York (5.7 percent), Seattle (5.2 percent), Minneapolis (5 percent), Chicago (4.7 percent) and Los Angeles (4.4 percent). The hourly billable rate growth for Washington, D.C., was 4 percent, according to CounselLink data.
At the opposite end of the spectrum, Miami and Dallas saw hourly rate growth of less than 3 percent.
Rates Moved Revenue Needle
Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group found slightly higher annual rate increases for its basket of firms than the CounselLink findings—a national average increase of 3.7 percent, compared with the 3.2 percent hourly rate increase from the CounselLink data.
The lawyer rate increase for the 20 Southeastern firms in Citi's sample was a bit lower than nationally, at 3 percent. Citi does not break out Atlanta or Georgia firms in its survey.
The bank noted in its year-end review of the industry that rate increases—not higher demand for legal services—continued to drive revenue growth.
Those results were similar to Citi's nine-month findings for 2017: National hourly rates increased 4.1 percent on average through last September, with slightly lower increases in the Southeast of, on average, 3.1 percent for the 18 firms reporting.
For the Citi survey, taken after the third quarter of 2017, 183 large firms participated, including 80 Am Law 100 firms, 49 Second Hundred firms and 54 niche or boutique firms.
M&A Lawyers Make Biggest Bucks
Perhaps unsurprisingly, CounselLink found that partners at large firms charged higher hourly rates, with a national median fee of $573 for the largest 50 firms, defined as those with 750 or more lawyers.
By contrast, the median hourly rate for partners at firms with 51 to 100 lawyers was $303. The figure dropped to $230 for firms with 50 or fewer lawyers.
Nationally, partner hourly rates varied widely by practice area, ranging from a median rate of $678 for M&A partners to $195 for insurance defense lawyers, according to CounselLink data.
Other areas with a median partner hourly rate of more than $500 were corporate ($595), regulatory and compliance ($576), and intellectual property ($545).
Practice areas where the median hourly partner rate was below $400 were real estate ($394), litigation ($360) and environmental ($338).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKing & Spalding Adds Veteran Antitrust Litigator From White & Case in New York
3 minute readClients, Not Counsel, Have Most To Gain from Georgia Tax Court, Lawyer Predicts
6 minute readElection Law Spending Is on the Rise, but Big Firms Have Reasons Not to Cash In
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.