Sole Shooting Witness Says Tex McIver Offered to Forgive Loan
Dani Jo Carter testified Tuesday that she still owed about $2,000 on a $15,000 loan from Diane McIver.
March 20, 2018 at 01:00 PM
4 minute read
Dani Jo Carter—the sole witness to the 2016 shooting of Diane McIver by her lawyer husband—told a Fulton County jury Tuesday that Claud “Tex” McIver offered to “ease up” on her repayment of a loan to his wife's estate.
Taking the witness stand for the second day Tuesday, Carter said McIver made the offer in the weeks following his wife's death on Sept. 26, 2016. Carter is testifying in McIver's ongoing murder trial over the death of his wife. Tex McIver, 75, is a retired partner from Atlanta law firm Fisher & Phillips.
Carter was driving as she and the McIvers returned home to Atlanta from a weekend at the couple's ranch. McIver, his attorneys and his spokesmen have always claimed the shooting was an accident. They have also said McIver has a sleep disorder that might have led him to fire the gun he was holding, supposedly because he was wary of a downtown Atlanta neighborhood they were driving through.
Carter testified she still owed Diane McIver more than $2,000 on a $15,000 loan from her longtime friend. Carter said a monthly payment was automatically deducted from her bank account.
Carter said that, after Diane McIver's death, her automatic payment was returned because McIver's bank accounts were locked. Carter said she received a note from McIver's administrative assistant at U.S. Enterprises, where McIver was the company's president, reminding her she owed a monthly payment.
Carter said she then called Tex McIver.
“I told him I didn't have any intention of not paying that loan,” she said. McIver replied “that he was going to ease up on it and for me not to worry about it,” she said.
That conversation took place weeks after Diane McIver's death and after McIver suggested that Carter not reveal to police that she was the sole witness to the shooting.
It was also antithetical to Diane McIver's approach to collecting on outstanding debts. Other witnesses, including her assistant at U.S. Enterprises, Terry Brown and U.S. Enterprises salesman Craig Stringer, have testified that, while Diane McIver was willing to loan money to her friends, she also charged them interest, required collateral and required monthly payments.
Stringer testified Monday that, whenever Diane McIver loaned him money, “It was always gentle when we were making the arrangements. It got heavier later.”
Carter testified Monday that, while emergency room personnel at Emory University Hospital were attempting to save Diane McIver's life, Tex McIver suggested to Carter that she not to tell anyone that she was in the couple's SUV when the shooting occurred.
McIver urged her to say she came down to the hospital as a friend of the family, if questioned about the shooting, Carter testified. She said she informed McIver, “I can't lie.”
Assistant District Attorney Clint Rucker didn't overtly suggest that Tex McIver might be trying to influence Carter's statements to police about the shooting by forgiving the loan. But McIver is charged with criminally attempting to influence witnesses, including Carter and her husband, Thomas Carter, by asking them to stop talking to police.
McIver also is charged with attempting to get his spokesman Bill Crane to alter initial statements he made to the media on McIver's behalf about the shooting.
Senior Assistant District Attorney Seleta Griffin also told the jury during her opening statement that McIver suggested to Jeff Dickerson, another McIver spokesman who was personal friends with Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard, that if he could get the case dropped, it would result in a performance bonus that Dickerson could share with the DA.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readKing & Spalding Adds Veteran Antitrust Litigator From White & Case in New York
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1California Implements New Law Banning Medical Debt From Credit Reports
- 2Trump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers For Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
- 3Climate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin Offices
- 4Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
- 5The Law Firm Disrupted: It's Bonus Time
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250