Tex McIver Told Husband of Shooting Witness She's 'About to Send Me to Prison'
The husband of shooting witness Dani Jo Carter and a family friend testified that, after shooting his wife, Atlanta attorney Tex McIver feared Carter's actions would make him look guilty.
March 21, 2018 at 08:39 PM
5 minute read
A week after Atlanta attorney Claud “Tex” McIver shot and killed his wife, he placed an urgent phone call to the husband of the sole witness in the shooting.
“Tommy Lee, it's Tex,” McIver said in the voicemail for Tom Carter Jr. “Sir, just let me be plain. Dani is about to send me to prison. Please erase this—this voice mail message—but call me right away. Y'all have no idea the problem this is causing. It's innocent, but it's absolutely nuclear to me. Please, please call me.”
Carter took the witness stand on Wednesday in McIver's ongoing murder trial over the death of his wife, Diane. Carter's testimony followed that of his wife, Dani Jo Carter—the sole witness to Diane McIver's shooting.
Tex McIver's frantic phone call to Tom Carter was one of eight he made to him on Oct. 6, 2016. McIver and his attorney, Stephen Maples, had urged Dani Jo Carter, Diane McIver's manicurist and friend of more than 40 years, to meet McIver and members of the news media at Maples' law office to give a formal public statement about the shooting.
The meeting had been set up, both Carters recalled during their testimony, after Tex McIver tried to talk to Dani Jo Carter about her “story” of the shooting.
But Carter testified that his wife changed her mind about attending. He said his wife was being “hounded” by the media and that she had finally hired a lawyer.
Instead, the couple skipped the scheduled interview and sought refuge at the home of neighbor Dale Cardwell, a former television reporter who is now a private consumer products investigator.
Carter said that, after seven increasingly urgent calls from McIver that morning, he called back.
“He was upset about the fact that she [Dani Jo] had hired an attorney to represent her,” he recalled. McIver was afraid Dani Jo Carter's decision to hire counsel would make him look guilty.
“My thinking was, 'Why is it OK for him to get an attorney, but it's not OK for my wife to get one?'” Carter testified. “That's what I didn't understand.”
Carter said that McIver was also insisting his wife speak to the media when he had yet to make his own statement. At the time, McIver was letting Maples and a hired spokesman do the talking for him.
It was not the first time Carter fielded multiple phone calls from Tex McIver following the shooting. McIver also called him multiple times shortly after Diane McIver died at Emory University Hospital.
McIver has never denied firing the fatal shot from the rear passenger seat of the couple's Ford Expedition as Dani Jo Carter drove it through the streets of downtown Atlanta. The trio was returning from a weekend at the McIvers' 75-acre ranch southeast of the city near Lake Oconee.
But he has always insisted the shooting was an accident, and his lawyers contend he suffers from a sleep disorder that could have led to the gun's inadvertent discharge.
Carter testified that McIver called him after the shooting to tell him, “There's been an accident. Diane is dead.” Carter had already received a text message from his wife saying there was an accident.
Unable to reach his wife by phone, Carter headed to Emory, unaware that she was being questioned by detectives at the Atlanta Police Department.
At the time, Tom Carter said neither he nor McIver knew police had taken his wife downtown.
At the hospital, Carter said he located McIver and Maples. McIver, he said, “told me they were on the way back from the ranch, and they ran into some traffic downtown, and they got off in what he felt like was a dangerous area. So they [his wife] handed him back his gun, and at some point he fell asleep, and the damned thing just went off,” Carter recalled.
Carter said he soon heard from his wife. He picked her up at the police department and returned with her to the hospital to pick up McIver, who had been treated by ER staff after complaining of anxiety. The SUV, by then, was secured by police, and the Carters took McIver home.
Dani Jo Carter has testified that, at the hospital, McIver suggested she should say only that she was at the hospital as a friend of the family, if questioned by police.
When she was questioned, Carter testified she didn't mention what McIver had said because, “It sounded very bad for Tex.”
Within a week, however, she had shared the information with Cardwell. “She said he [McIver] suggested that she could stay out of the entire matter,” Cardwell said.
Dani Jo Carter confided even more to Cardwell that the jury didn't hear—the result of objections by McIver's lawyers and a ruling by Fulton County Superior Court Chief Judge Robert McBurney.
Cardwell said that Carter also told him McIver suggested “it might be best” if she simply left the hospital. “And he indicated to her he had called Steve Maples, his attorney, and that he seemed to be in a strategy situation rather than a grief situation,” Cardwell recalled.
Cardwell also said that Carter had confided that, at the hospital, “Tex was acting strangely. He didn't seem to be speaking or thinking things that were consistent with someone who would be in deep grief.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readOn The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
6 minute readWoman's Suit Alleging Negligence to Sex Trafficking by Hotel Tossed by Federal Judge
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250