Tex McIver Told Sole Witness to Shooting He 'Can't Go To Jail'
Dani Jo Carter, a longtime friend of shooting victim Diane McIver, testified Wednesday that she had witnessed a shoving match between Tex McIver and his wife months before he shot her.
March 21, 2018 at 01:38 PM
4 minute read
Dani Jo Carter, the sole witness to the 2016 fatal shooting of Diane McIver, on Wednesday told the jury hearing the murder case of Atlanta attorney Claud “Tex” McIver that he told her, “I can't go to jail.”
Carter said McIver made the comment while at Emory University Hospital shortly after he fatally shot his wife. McIver and his lawyers have always insisted Diane McIver's shooting was an accident—a conclusion Carter testified she believed at the time and had shared with Atlanta police.
Carter testified Wednesday that she had just returned to the hospital emergency room with her husband and rejoined McIver and Stephen Maples, an attorney he called minutes after they rushed Diane McIver to Emory's emergency room from Midtown Atlanta, bypassing several closer hospitals, including the city's two Trauma I facilities.
But attorney Bruce Harvey, a member of McIver's defense team, suggested Wednesday his client's comment was a reference to claustrophobia rather than an implication of guilt.
Carter was driving the McIvers' SUV, chauffeuring the couple home from a weekend at their 75-acre ranch on Sept. 2, 2016, when a traffic jam led her to exit the interstate in downtown Atlanta. McIver, sitting in the back seat, expressed wariness at the neighborhood and asked for his gun. A few miles north, while Carter was stopped at a red light, the gun fired, fatally wounding Diane McIver, who was sitting in the front passenger seat.
Before concluding her testimony Wednesday morning, after more than two days on the stand, Carter said she once witnessed Tex McIver shove his wife during a heated argument in 2016—an incident she never shared with police or prosecutors until March 18 while prosecutors were preparing her to testify at McIver's murder trial. Prosecutors did not share information on Carter's new revelation with McIver's defense team until Tuesday, and McIver's defense objected to its introduction.
Carter said the incident she witnessed stemmed from a mishap when the McIvers' godson, Austin Schwall, burned his finger at a fire pit at the couple's ranch. The boy, then 10, was hysterical, she said, and recalled icing the child's finger to ease his pain.
Later that night, after everyone went to bed, Carter said she was awakened by Austin's cries from the McIvers' master bedroom. She said the bag of ice she gave the child had leaked all over the couple's bed, that Diane had thrown it in the bathroom sink and that Austin was crying “because his finger was burning.”
Diane McIver was insisting that “there was nothing wrong” with Austin as Tex attempted to quiet her, Carter recalled. Then, she said, “They shoved each other. Tex kind of pushed Diane out of the bedroom and closed the door.” The McIvers “had been drinking,” Carter recalled.
Carter said she had never witnessed that kind of confrontation between the McIvers. “I was so upset about it I called my husband,” she said.
Harvey, who cross-examined Carter at length on Tuesday and has strived to portray his client as a courtly “Southern gentleman,” suggested the incident was “insignificant.” Carter, he pointed out, had failed to mention it to Atlanta police when they questioned her immediately after Diane McIver's death and had failed to recount the couple's confrontation to Fulton County prosecutors during multiple interviews with them since February 2017.
“It was so important you wanted to let him [Assistant District Attorney Clint Rucker] know about it,” Harvey rejoined. “But it didn't come out until Sunday, did it?”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGlynn County Judge Rejects Ex-DA's Motion to Halt Her Misconduct Trial in Ahmaud Arbery Investigation
Trump Election-Interference Prosecution Appears on Course to Wind Down
4 minute readJudge Sets Early 2025 Trial for Ex-Prosecutor Charged With Meddling in Ahmaud Arbery Investigation
3 minute readRapper Young Thug Is a Free Man. Here Are Things to Know About His Plea.
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250