Fisher & Phillips Launches Lobbying Subsidiary Amid 'Weinstein Effect'
With leadership based in Sacramento and Philadelphia, FP Advocacy will focus on federal regulation and California, where almost two-dozen antisexual harassment bills are before the state legislature.
March 22, 2018 at 04:00 PM
4 minute read
National labor & employment firm Fisher & Phillips has launched a lobbying subsidiary, FP Advocacy, expanding its client services beyond advising on new laws and regulations to helping shape them.
Ben Ebbink in Sacramento and Rick Grimaldi in Philadelphia, both members of the firm's 14-lawyer government relations practice, are heading the shop.
“We want to be more engaged in the process in real-time—letting clients know what's coming and having the ability to influence things—for instance, if a bill is coming down the pike that affects a certain industry,” Ebbink said. “It gives us the ability to engage in legislative advocacy in a whole new realm, which is something the firm hasn't really done before.”
Ebbink and Grimaldi both have regulatory and public policy experience in labor and employment issues. Ebbink joined Fisher Phillips last year as of counsel after 14 years as the chief consultant to the California State Assembly's Labor and Employment Committee, where he negotiated and drafted legislation.
Grimaldi co-chairs the firm's government relations practice and was formerly chief counsel for the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry as well as deputy chief counsel to former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge. (He also has a weekly talk radio show covering issues of the day, “Dr. Mazz and Rick Grimaldi Show,” on Philadelphia's CBS affiliate, Talk Radio 1210.)
For now, Ebbink said, FP Advocacy's primary focus will be on state legislation in California and federal regulation in Washington. “California is just so active, so we felt it made sense to put a lot of emphasis there. It seems like the tail that wags the dog,” he said, noting that labor and employment laws initially passed in California often get adopted in other states.
Right now, the biggest employment-related public policy issue in California by far is sexual harassment and the #MeToo movement, Ebbink added.
“We're calling it the 'Weinstein effect.' We're seeing more litigation and more complaints being filed, and the legislative side is definitely cranking up,” he said, adding that there are almost two-dozen bills addressing the issue before the California State Legislature this year, with the majority placing new requirements or liability on employers.
Ebbink has summarized the proposals on the California Employers Blog that he writes for Fisher Phillips.
The proposal include:
- Prohibiting mandatory arbitration clauses for workplace sexual harassment claims;
- Extending the time for employees to file claims with the state; and
- Presuming employer retaliation for any negative job actions that occur within 90 days of an employee reporting sexual harassment.
Sexual harassment prevention training and restricting the use of confidentiality provisions in settlement agreements also are on the table.
Currently there is not a lot of federal legislative activity around labor and employment law, Ebbink said, but a lot is happening at federal regulatory agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the National Labor Relations Board and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
“We're seeing more activity at the state level, especially in blue states trying to respond to the Trump administration,” he said, such as on immigration. The Department of Justice sued California earlier this month, challenging sanctuary laws that restrict private employers and local enforcement agencies from sharing information about undocumented immigrants with federal enforcement agencies.
“It's an uphill battle for employers in California,” Ebbink said. “There's an opportunity for them to weigh in with their concerns and to say what does and doesn't work [during the legislative process],” he said. “We want to be more proactively engaged in that process, as opposed to sitting back and waiting to see what happens, and letting clients know [about laws] for next year.”
While Ebbink and Grimaldi are both attorneys, FP Advocacy is a wholly owned but separate subsidiary of Fisher Phillips. That gives them the flexibility to add nonlawyer professionals, such as lobbyists. “We want to attract people with experience in labor and employment issues who fill the need—who may not be attorneys,” Ebbink said.
Other firms, such as Charlotte-based Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein, have taken a similar approach with their lobbying operations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250