Savannah Law School Is Latest to Shut Down
For the second time, Atlanta's John Marshall Law School is pulling out of Savannah, where it has operated a branch campus since 2012.
March 22, 2018 at 11:35 AM
5 minute read
Yet another law campus is closing shop.
Administrators at the short-lived Savannah Law School informed students late Wednesday that it will shutter at the end of the spring semester.
Details of the closure were scant Thursday morning, but students told the Savannah Morning News that the school's leadership said it had sold the law school's building and would not be accepting new students.
Savannah, which opened in 2012, will become the nation's fourth law school in the past year to either close or announce plans to wind down, joining Indiana Tech Law School, Whittier Law School and the Charlotte School of Law. A fifth school, Indiana's Valparaiso University School of Law, is not accepting new students as it seeks to merge with another law school or relocate. The closures come as law schools struggle to attract applicants amid a tight job market and years of declining national bar pass rates.
Dean Malcolm Morris did not respond to calls for comment Thursday. The school released a statement Thursday citing an “unforeseen national decline” in legal jobs and the law school applicant pool.
“The Board's decision was prompted by the continued small student enrollment at the branch. As such, it was the Board's responsibility to acknowledge that a viable program of legal education could not be sustained at that location,” the school's statement reads.
The law school's website states that it is not accepting applications for 2018, and instead directs people to apply to Atlanta's John Marshall Law School.
Savannah Law School is not a standalone law school. Rather, it is a branch campus of John Marshall and is accredited by the American Bar Association under the umbrella of the Atlanta school.
Students learned of the closure at a town hall meeting at 5 p.m. Wednesday. Faculty members were informed several hours earlier.
According to Katelyn Ashton, editor-in-chief of the Savannah Law Review and a part-time student due to graduate in May, students were told at the town hall that the school's enrollment was too low to be profitable. That message was delivered by Michael Markovitz, treasurer of the school's board of directors, who Ashton said is also the owner of the law school's building.
“He said the school was never able to 'attract the number of quality students needed to be sustainable,'” Ashton said in an interview Thursday. “The decision was made solely on the basis of profitability, which is unfortunate because of the great things we've done.”
Associate Professor Andrew Wright lamented the closure in a Facebook post Wednesday. “My heart aches for my colleagues and students,” he wrote. “I also feel terrible for our deposited prospective students, alumni and broader Savannah community. Our stakeholders deserve better.”
Savannah has about a dozen faculty members and roughly 200 students.
Students were told that current third-year students will be able to graduate in May, but first- and second-year students will have to complete their degrees at another location, since the campus is being sold. The ABA requires shuttering law schools to provide a “teach-out plan” to ensure current students can finish.
Ashton said the school was offering Savannah students one-time relocation scholarships of $2,000, if they transferred to the main Atlanta campus, which is 250 miles away. Current students could opt to stay in Savannah and take classes at another location, she said, or transfer to other schools altogether.
The decision caught students by surprise, Ashton said, even if earlier cutbacks hinted at financial problems. Administrators had slashed the budgets of co-curricular activities such as moot court and law review, she said, and at some point the school stopped replacing faculty members who had left. The school was also slow to fill vacant positions in the admissions department, she added.
John Marshall, in 2011 announced plans to establish a branch campus in Savannah, Georgia's second-largest city, which at the time lacked a law school. It opened the following year with 45 students, although its then-dean, Richardson Lynn, said he hoped to grow that number to 450.
While figures are not available specifically for the Savannah campus, ABA data shows that J.D. enrollment at the combined campuses fell 37 percent from 2011 to 2017.
It's the second time that Atlanta law school is pulling out of Savannah. It had a branch campus there during the 1970s and early 1980s.
Savannah operates out of a 110,000-square-foot historic former hospital on the edge of the city's famed Forsyth Park, which could offer a clue as to why the location was attractive to a buyer.
But the decision to close is a blow to current students.
“Our school has brilliant faculty,” Ashton said. “They mentored us, they guided us, they challenged us. But they were constantly let down by the administration. People are devastated here, because they didn't have any idea what was happening. We were kept in the dark intentionally.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readUniversity of Georgia School of Law Finds Next Dean on Its Own Faculty
3 minute readTeen Charged in Barrow School Shooting and His Father to Stay in Custody After Hearings
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250