Behind Every Good Lawyer Is a Great Assistant
The essential value proposition of a legal assistant is time management.
March 30, 2018 at 10:59 AM
5 minute read
Generally speaking, most lawyers are not good managers, but there is an antidote for that deficiency, says Lawrence H. Freiman. It's called the administrative or legal assistant.
Freiman, founding partner of MendenFreiman, an Atlanta business and estate planning law firm, calls his executive legal assistant, Johnnie L. Hooper, “one of those rare finds that comes to you once in a career.” Hooper takes on varied responsibilities at the firm, and Freiman sums up her role this way: “She frees me up to do the things that have a higher value for my time.”
Behind every good lawyer and rainmaker is a great organizer–and it's probably an administrative or legal assistant.
April 25 is Administrative Professionals' Day, and it comes at a time when law firms continue to look for economies in nonbillable support staffing. Many younger attorneys and even partners share legal assistants at ever-higher attorney-to-assistant ratios as firms look for savings that can go straight to the bottom line. But every six minutes that lawyers invest in nonbillable chores is time lost to making their practice profitable. Freiman wonders why other attorneys and professionals don't move some of the big rocks that slow down their day and get in the way of business development or billable time to an administrative assistant.
Don't Manage Your Own Calendar
The biggest rock that Hooper picks up for Freiman is his calendar. “It baffles me that many lawyers hold on to their calendar when they a have a resource to handle this very time-consuming chore,” he says. Hooper is “100 percent in control” of his calendar, he says, and he empowers her to make decisions on blocking his time. Sometimes that means directing a call to another attorney, or she may find a 10-minute carve-out in his schedule where he can answer a question quickly for a client.
Closely related to calendar management is email, another area where attorneys may be tempted to be too hands-on. Freiman receives an avalanche of email each day, and just as Hooper screens calls, she brings emails to his attention that need immediate attention. One powerful Outlook tool for attorneys, he says, is the “sent on behalf” option, which allows an attorney to delegate joint access to email to an assistant.
“She is the proverbial gatekeeper,” he says. “She knows when I need to be alerted to something right away, and she knows when it can wait or be handled by someone else,” always in such a way that the caller feels like they were treated with respect and weren't brushed off. This judgment, he adds, is partly the product of her own intelligence and resourcefulness, but he also goes out of his way to explain his priorities to her.
“Johnnie has good instincts, but I don't depend on that alone,” says Freiman. “She's an important person on my team and I make a point to tell her what I'm working on so that she can help me prioritize my time.”
Don't Hire a “Yes” Person
When lawyers hire legal assistants, Freiman says they should respect the position, as well as the person. That means hiring someone they feel confident in empowering to make decisions but who also understands the primary job is to make the boss' day run smoothly. As the first person who clients and other lawyers meet at the office and who screens calls, the legal assistant has to be someone who presents well, is tactful and has an intuitive understanding of the right thing to do in every situation.
Freiman also likes Hooper because she's not a “yes” person who is afraid to speak up. “She'll push back occasionally, always in an appropriate way, and I value that. I may or may not change my mind, but it makes me a more thoughtful manager.”
The essential value proposition of a legal assistant is time management, Freiman says. Lawyers who pride themselves on doing everything themselves do themselves a disservice. “I tell young lawyers that one of the biggest mistakes I see attorneys make is underutilization of their assistants. So many lawyers spend time on tasks such as calendaring that they don't do very well. Hand off what you can to a competent assistant, and you'll be a better lawyer and have more time for business development.”
Robin Hensley's column is based on her work as president of Raising the Bar and coaching lawyers in business development for more than 25 years. She is the author of “Raising the Bar: Legendary Rainmakers Share Their Business Development Secrets.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBusiness Breakups: Why Business and Commercial Cases Are Well-Suited to Mediation
5 minute readIn RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
Trending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250