Judge: Fulton's Delay Notifying Insurer of Pay Parity Suits Voids Coverage
U.S. District Judge William Duffey Jr. ruled that the county's failure to notify its liability insurer about several lawsuits lets National Casualty Co. off the hook for more than $6.5 million the county sought to help pay for an $18 million settlement in 2015.
March 30, 2018 at 04:38 PM
5 minute read
A federal judge has ruled that Fulton County's failure to notify its liability carrier about several lawsuits filed largely by county lawyers over pay discrepancies—delays ranging from months to years—means the insurer doesn't have to pony up about $6.5 million the county wanted to help pay for an $18.3 million settlement.
On Thursday, U.S. District Judge William Duffey Jr. ruled that National Casualty Co. is off the hook for nearly all of the county's claims, although he said a jury issue remains for one relatively small grievance action the county settled for more than $450,000.
Duffey agreed with the county that the employment claims are covered by the insurance policies—which National Casualty denied—but he said the county waited too long to tell notify the insurer.
National Casualty's attorney, John Malone of Goldberg Segalla's office in Greensboro, North Carolina, said he did not have permission to discuss the case.
The county is represented by Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers partner David Atkinson and associate Jonathan Kandel. Patrise Perkins-Hooker, attorney for Fulton County, declined to comment.
The case involves a yearslong dispute over pay parity for county attorneys that spawned seven lawsuits and the grievance action. All involved a now-discontinued program that ran from 2000 to 2005 under which lawyers hired for the county's Law Department were paid more than lawyers hired for other departments.
In 2006, 23 staff attorneys for the State and Superior Courts filed a grievance against the county for pay parity and back pay, asserting that the pay disparity violated the county's personnel regulations.
The grievance committee refused to hear their complaint, and the court clerks eventually filed an arbitration demand. An arbitrator ruled in their favor, awarding $4.3 million, and the Georgia Court of Appeals upheld the award in 2015.
In the meantime, lawyers with the offices of the county solicitor, public defender, district attorney, child attorney and 73 sheriff's office employees—who said some deputies were paid more than others—filed lawsuits claiming breach of contract and violations of county regulations and the Civil Service Act of 1982. They all sought back pay.
After the Court of Appeals upheld the court clerks' award and another trial court's summary judgment for a separate case brought by public defenders, the county and employees entered into mediation and reached a nearly $18.4 million global settlement in October 2015.
According to Fulton County Commission minutes, the settlement includes $5.9 million in attorney fees and expenses for the firm handling all of the complaints, Parks, Chesin & Walbert.
According to the declaratory judgment action National Casualty filed in federal court in Georgia's Northern District in March 2016, Fulton County had $7 million in “employment practices wrongful act” coverage between July 2013 and July 2014. A renewal policy increased the limit to $10 million for 2014 to 2015.
Fulton County demanded nearly $6.6 million from National Casualty in January 2016 for what it deemed the insurer's portion of the settlement.
National Casualty denied coverage, arguing in its complaint that the county's “liability for back pay and reimbursements did not arise out of any employment practices wrongful act within the meaning of the policies,” and that exclusions written into the contract excluded the pay parity claims.
The insurer also argued the county was obligated to inform it as soon as practical of a claim or likely litigation. But the county waited up to three years after the various lawsuits were filed to notify the insurer.
That was “a significant and unreasonable delay” and a material breach of the polices, according to National Casualty.
Fulton County filed counterclaims arguing the policies at issue covered the pay parity claims, and that National Casualty breached its contract by failing to indemnify the county.
Both sides filed motions for summary judgment, and Duffey's 52-page order granted and denied portions of each.
Duffey agreed with the county that the policies clearly covered the pay parity actions and granted the county summary judgment on that issue.
He wrote that the notice requirements in the policies “are not ambiguous” and that National Casualty is not obligated to provide coverage as a result.
Granting summary judgment to the insurer on all of the lawsuits, Duffey said the only jury issue remaining is whether the insurer is liable to indemnify the county for a 2015 grievance action filed by 22 members of the public defender's office. According to the county commission's minutes, that portion of the settlement was $453,333.
Parks, Chesin & Walbert partner A. Lee Parks, whose firm is not a party to case against National Casualty, said he is not aware of any other declaratory judgment actions arising from the delay in notifying the insurer.
But Parks said the “ruling isn't surprising,” given the county's delay in providing notice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhistleblowing Employee Helps Land $750K 'False Claims' Settlement With OGCC Behavioral Health
4 minute readOff the Salary Battlefield, Public Sector Struggles With Retention, Student Debt
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250