Two Lawyers and Client on Trial Over Waffle House Sex Tape
Former Cobb County Assistant District Attorney John Butters and Marietta lawyer David Cohen are accused of violating Georgia's eavesdropping law by helping their client record a sexual encounter with a Waffle House executive.
April 02, 2018 at 03:24 PM
5 minute read
David Cohen (left) and John Butters (Photo: John Disney/ALM)
Two attorneys and their client—the former housekeeper for the chairman of Waffle House—are on trial this week in Atlanta on charges that they violated the state's eavesdropping law by recording a secret sex tape.
A jury was seated Monday in the trial of John Butters, a former Cobb County assistant district attorney, and Marietta lawyer David Cohen over a sex tape that their client and co-defendant, Mye Brindle, recorded during an encounter at the home of Waffle House chairman and then-CEO Joe Rogers Jr.
That sex tape, sealed by judges in two counties in 2012, was the basis for a demand Butters and Cohen made suggesting that Rogers pay his housekeeper $12 million to keep quiet over claims he repeatedly sexually harassed her or else face a civil lawsuit and potentially ruinous publicity.
Court records described the recording as depicting Rogers shaving nude in his bathroom and then lying on his bed as Brindle manually serviced him.
Rogers and his civil lawyers at Marietta firm Moore Ingram Johnson & Steele have aggressively combated Brindle's claims, suing her and her lawyers and lobbying for criminal charges against the trio in what has become a tangle of civil and criminal cross-claims and litigation that shows little sign of resolution after six years. Rogers has not denied the June 20 sexual liaison but has claimed it was consensual.
In 2016, Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard's office waded into the civil dispute, securing a four-count felony indictment accusing Butters and Cohen of conspiracy to commit extortion, conspiracy to commit unlawful surveillance and unlawful surveillance.
Georgia law makes it a crime for any person through the use of any device, without consent of all persons observed, to photograph or record the activities of others that occur in a private place out of public view. The only exceptions are for people in prison or in jail and property owners who install cameras for security purposes.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Henry Newkirk, who is presiding over the criminal trial, initially threw out the indictment, only to have the Supreme Court of Georgia reinstate the eavesdropping charges last November.
In affirming Newkirk's dismissal of the extortion conspiracy charge, the high court ruled that Cohen's demand letter warning of a potential civil suit using the sex tape as evidence, though aggressive, did not rise to the level of a criminal threat.
But the high court also ruled that, although Georgia's eavesdropping law only requires one-party consent, it only applies to oral, wire and electronic communications, not video recordings.
At a pretrial hearing in February, Newkirk told prosecutors and defense lawyers that he felt strongly that the case should have “a universal agreement and settlement.”
The high court's other rulings in the competing civil litigation and their multiple appeals have not favored Butters and Cohen, but the defense argued again Tuesday to have counts dismissed before opening statements were scheduled to begin.
Last Thursday, the high court declined Cohen's motion for reconsideration of its earlier ruling upholding nearly $200,000 in legal fees awarded to Rogers. Former Fulton Court State Court Judge Susan Forsling had directed that Rogers' fees be paid after holding in 2013 that Brindle's sexual harassment lawsuit, filed in Fulton County just two days after Rogers sued her first in Cobb County, was frivolous.
Rogers sued following failed negotiations associated with Cohen's initial demand letter on Brindle's behalf. Forsling ruled that Brindle should have filed a counterclaim to the Cobb suit.
The high court last year also upheld a Cobb County judge's decision to disqualify Cohen and Butters as Brindle's counsel in the civil suit. Cobb County Superior Court Judge Robert Leonard, who later recused from the civil case, disqualified the lawyers after determining their attorney-client privilege could be pierced over the production of the videotape. In that order, Leonard said the videotape, which he reviewed, “makes it clear that defendant was a willing participant in the sexual encounter and is not the victim of a sexual battery.”
Two private investigators may be key to the prosecution's case.
Thomas Hawkins, owner of Hawk Private Investigations Inc., and investigator Michael Deegan said in civil depositions obtained by the Daily Report that they balked when the lawyers asked for help in securing video evidence to document Brindle's claims.
According to the two investigators, they met with Cohen and Butters two days before Brindle retained the lawyers on June 6, 2012, and three weeks before she made the sex tape.
The investigators are represented by former Georgia Gov. Roy Barnes.
But in a pretrial hearing in February, Cohen attorney Brian Steel sought to portray Brindle as a vulnerable, single mother who repeatedly was lured into situations where Rogers forced her to submit to unwanted sexual advances.
Steel contended that, as a victim of an alleged sexual predator, Brindle was legally justified in surreptitiously recording what he claimed was a criminal act. Rogers has not been charged with a crime tied to Brindle's allegations.
Rogers' wife, Fran Rogers, told the Daily Report in February that she believes Brindle intended to play on Rogers' fears that his wife would find out about the affair.
“Their hope was Joe would be embarrassed and that he would pay them money for their silence,” she said. “Their worst nightmare was when Joe told me. They lost what they thought was their leverage.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Reed Smith Joins Saudi Legal Boom as Firms Race for Market Share Reed Smith Joins Saudi Legal Boom as Firms Race for Market Share](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/americanlawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2023/03/AdobeStock_391708693-767x633.jpg)
![Ex-Prosecutor’s Trial Ends as Judge Throws Out Her Felony Indictment in Ahmaud Arbery Death Case Ex-Prosecutor’s Trial Ends as Judge Throws Out Her Felony Indictment in Ahmaud Arbery Death Case](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4a/22/b6b050d84da7bcf0308c1cbe2593/jackie-johnson-3-767x633.jpg)
Ex-Prosecutor’s Trial Ends as Judge Throws Out Her Felony Indictment in Ahmaud Arbery Death Case
![Georgia Law Schools Seeing 24% More Applicants This Year Georgia Law Schools Seeing 24% More Applicants This Year](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/ba/25/ab56f4544e65b1ed49e1b47de472/uga-law-school01-767x633-1.jpg)
![Ex-Prosecutor Denies on Witness Stand That She Tried to Protect Ahmaud Arbery's Killers Ex-Prosecutor Denies on Witness Stand That She Tried to Protect Ahmaud Arbery's Killers](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4a/22/b6b050d84da7bcf0308c1cbe2593/jackie-johnson-3-767x633.jpg)
Ex-Prosecutor Denies on Witness Stand That She Tried to Protect Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
Trending Stories
- 1Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 2Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
- 3GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 4Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 5Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250