Waffle House Exec's Wife Defends Husband in Sex Tape Trial
The judge earlier in the day tossed out the conspiracy charge against the attorneys and their client.
April 03, 2018 at 02:17 PM
4 minute read
Waffle House chairman Joe Rogers Jr.'s wife testified Tuesday that their housekeeper's job performance began to deteriorate a year before she made a secret sex tape with her boss.
Fran Rogers said that, by April 2012, Mye Brindle was shorting her hours, spent much of her time on her computer and was shirking duties. Rogers said that whenever she discussed her job performance with Brindle, she would get better for a while, but it never lasted.
By 2012, Rogers said she began raising questions about Brindle's expense reports and that Brindle began asking for advances even as her job performance continued to slide. She soon discovered that Brindle was having financial difficulties.
But Brindle remained employed until she left her resignation in Joe Rogers' sock drawer in June 2012, Fran Rogers said. That was shortly after Brindle secretly videotaped a sexual encounter with Roger's husband.
That sex tape is the basis for criminal charges Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard's office filed against Brindle and two attorneys she hired, Marietta attorney David Cohen and former Cobb County prosecutor John Butters. The trial opened Monday.
Assistant District Attorney Melissa Redmon told the jury that, as Brindle's relationship with Fran Rogers grew more contentious and her job appeared in jeopardy, Brindle and her lawyers “hatched a plan to catch Mr. Rogers in the act,” then use it as the basis for a future lawsuit.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Henry Newkirk on Tuesday dismissed a felony eavesdropping conspiracy charge against Butters, Cohen and Brindle related to that sex tape. But Newkirk left in place two felony charges for a jury to decide. One accuses Cohen, Butters and Brindle of violating a state eavesdropping law banning video recordings in a private place. The second eavesdropping charge names only Brindle.
Newkirk made his ruling from the bench after the selection of a 12-person jury and two alternates Monday evening.
The ruling came after Atlanta defense attorney Brian Steel, who is defending Cohen, argued the entire indictment should be set aside.
Steel argued the indictment does not cite sufficient specific information to inform the defendants of exactly what charges they were facing or on what a county grand jury ultimately based its indictment.
Butters is represented by Marietta defense attorney Jimmy Berry and Bruce Morris of Atlanta's Finestone Morris & White. Brindle is represented by Marietta lawyer Reid Thompson.
Newkirk's decision to dismiss the conspiracy charge against the two attorneys and Brindle follows his decision in 2016 to dismiss the original indictment. Last November, the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed Newkirk's decision to toss the extortion count but reinstated what were then three eavesdropping charges.
During Tuesday's openings, defense lawyers contended that Brindle is a victim whom Joe Rogers had required to stimulate him sexually as an unofficial, but expected part of her job.
“She made a decision that too many women have to make,” said Thompson, Brindle's attorney. “Do what the boss requires you to do. It was unwanted. … There was no love. No passion. No cuddling. No kissing. … It was just another chore for the maid to do.”
Brindle decided in 2012 to record one of those sexual encounters because “Joe Rogers is a very wealthy man, a very powerful man and very well connected,” Thompson said.
Steel contended in his opening statement that Brindle was a sex abuse victim and that Rogers had no expectation of privacy when he invited her into his bedroom to engage in an adulterous relationship. He said Cohen, as a lawyer, accurately concluded that Brindle had the right to record Rogers without his knowledge under those circumstances.
Cohen gave Brindle “proper legal advice” in good faith, Steel said.
“David Cohen did not deserve this,” he said. “He did nothing wrong. He gave the correct legal analysis with the fact pattern presented.”
Berry also emphasized that Rogers is “a rich and powerful man” whom Brindle so feared that she initially would not give the lawyers his name.
Berry said Brindle told Butters “I am afraid of him [Rogers]. Everybody knows him. I'm a nobody. Who's going to believe me?”
“John Butters believed her,” Berry said. “David Cohen believed her. They listened to her story. They believed what she told them. … For that they are sitting here … charged with a crime because they were doing what they thought was the right thing to do for their client.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSunbelt Law Firms Experienced More Moderate Growth Last Year, Alongside Some Job Cuts and Less Merger Interest
4 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The TikTokification of the Courtroom
- 2New Jersey’s Arbitration Appeal Deadline—A Call for Clarity
- 3Law Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
- 45th Circuit Strikes Down Law Barring Handgun Sales to Adults Under 21
- 5Commonwealth Court Overturns Zoning Board’s Denial Based on Merger Doctrine and Unnecessary Hardship Questions
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250