11th Circuit Rules Constitution Allows GPS Search in Alien Smuggling Case
A GPS was the smoking gun in a Wednesday decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.In a per curiam decision, a panel of…
April 11, 2018 at 05:42 PM
4 minute read
A GPS was the smoking gun in a Wednesday decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
In a per curiam decision, a panel of three judges denied an appeal based on the contention that pulling information from a global positioning system device violated the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches.
Judges Gerald Tjoflat, William Pryor and R. Lanier Anderson affirmed the conviction and four year, three month prison sentence of Maikel Suarez Plasencia (Suarez) for “encouraging and inducing aliens to enter the United States.”
“On the morning of September 6, 2015, twenty-eight Cuban migrants were found on Loggerhead Key, Florida,” the judges wrote. “Later that day, Suarez's boat broke down on Garden Key, an island three miles east of Loggerhead Key and seventy miles west of Key West. A park ranger, David Fuellner, responded to a report of Suarez's beached boat and located Suarez and the boat.”
Prosecutors said the report relayed that “a Spanish-speaking man had told a park supervisor that he had been camping and fishing for the previous two days, that he needed fuel for his boat and that he needed to get … to Key West to get somebody to come back and bring him fuel.”
The park ranger asked for permission to search the boat, and Suarez consented orally and in writing, the judges said.
The signed form authorized Fuellner to perform a “complete” search of the vessel and to seize its contents for any “legitimate law enforcement purpose,” the judges said. Suarez then took a ferry to Key West to summon help with fixing his boat.
Fuellner conducted the search the next day and found a GPS which, once plugged into the boat's power source and turned on, showed a waypoint indicating that the boat had been just off of Cuba's shore on Sept. 5, 2015.
Fuellner then powered off the GPS, seized it and entered it into evidence. Later, the U.S. Coast Guard analyzed the GPS and found that Suarez left Key West around 1:30 a.m. on Sept. 5, arrived off the coast of Cuba at about 4:30 p.m. that day and then reached the vicinity of Loggerhead and Garden Keys in the early morning of Sept. 6.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agents interviewed Suarez on Sept. 8 and said that “Suarez claimed that he had taken his boat on a spear-fishing trip from Key West to the Dry Tortugas and that he spent a night on the vessel. He denied knowledge of a migrant landing in the area,” he said. But the boat had no fishing gear or bait.
When confronted with the GPS evidence, Suarez said the agents must have mixed up his device with someone else's.
“However, Suarez admitted that his wife and two of his children were among the migrants who landed on September 6, 2015,” the judges said.
A federal grand jury in the Southern District of Florida charged him with alien smuggling. Suarez filed a motion to suppress the GPS evidence, which the judge denied. The judge said he consented to the search and that he had abandoned his boat.
A jury convicted him.
The Eleventh Circuit judges affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress the GPS evidence.
Suarez was represented by Federal Public Defender for the Southern District of Florida Michael Caruso.
The prosecutor was Assistant U.S. Attorney John C. Shipley.
The lawyers could not be reached immediately for comment.
The case is U.S.A. v. Maikel Suarez Plasencia, No. 16-16946.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCensorship or Security Measure? TikTok Ban Pits Civil Liberties Groups Against US Officials
Trump Seeks to Have Georgia Election Case Dismissed, Cites Presidential Immunity
4 minute readJustices Weigh Constitutional Standard Applicable to Law Banning Trans Care
When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Trending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250