McIver Defense Introduces Sleep Disorder Evidence
Tex McIver's diagnoses came 16 months after he shot his wife, Diane.
April 11, 2018 at 02:39 PM
6 minute read
A neurologist and research director of Emory University's sleep medicine program testified Wednesday that he diagnosed Atlanta attorney Claud “Tex” McIver with a sleep disorder that can cause people to act out their dreams.
Dr. David Rye said he diagnosed McIver as suffering from rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavioral disorder after a January 2018 study—16 months after McIver fatally shot his wife. McIver and his lawyers have always claimed the Sept. 16, 2016, shooting was an accident.
But Rye also suggested that particular disorder is not a likely explanation for McIver shooting his wife, Diane.
Rye also described a second syndrome—confusional arousal, also known as sleep drunkenness—that he said was “one possible explanation.”
Rye's 2018 diagnosis was intended to bolster the defense narrative that McIver was asleep in the back of the couple's Ford Expedition as it drove through downtown Atlanta when the gun he was holding fired. Witnesses have testified McIver offered multiple versions of why he was holding the gun and what caused it to fire, including that he just didn't remember.
But Dani Jo Carter, the family friend who was driving the McIvers' SUV when McIver fatally shot his wife, has testified that she and Diane McIver thought her husband was asleep when they left the interstate to avoid a traffic tie-up. He woke and asked for his gun, then apparently dozed off a second time.
Rye testified that McIver underwent an earlier sleep study at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida, in 2004.
Rye described REM sleep behavioral disorder as a condition where people “will act out their dreams.”
Those dreams “are usually emotionally laden,” Rye said. “Oftentimes there is some emotion that you are being chased, or there is some danger.” People with this disorder “don't arouse quickly,” he said. “They usually have amnesia.”
People suffering from the disorder can injure bed partners or themselves, Rye said.
“We have bed partners that have gotten black eyes, broken bones,” he said. “We have had patients that have broken bones from falling out of bed or hitting bedrails.”
Rye said confusional arousal occurs as a person wakes from sleep. He said it often occurs where there was a “high pressure to deep sleep” and can be brought on by sleep deprivation and augmented by stress.
Rye also said there was nothing that would have prevented McIver from falling asleep, even after he had perceived a danger and asked for his gun. McIver's account that he was startled awake about the time the gun fired is consistent with confusional arousal.
Rye also acknowledged, when questioned by Assistant District Attorney Adam Abbate, that confusional arousal is generally preceded by deep sleep. Rye also acknowledged that January 2018 was the first time McIver was diagnosed with confusional arousal.
Abbate also questioned defense attorney Amanda Clark Palmer's suggestion that McIver might have shot his wife while in the throes of confusional arousal. During a 30-45 minute ride from a Conyers steakhouse to downtown Atlanta, McIver was supposedly sleeping and woke up as the car exited the interstate.
“What he told you, he woke up, immediately recognized the area he was in, immediately recognized the area wasn't safe,” Abbate said to Rye. “He wasn't suffering from sleep drunkenness. … When he wakes up the second time, he is alert, he knows the bullet has been discharged.”
Again, Abbate suggested the hallmarks of confusional arousal didn't appear to be present.
“People perform cognitively at different levels when they wake up,” Rye replied. “I don't know how that translates into this specific event. I wasn't there.”
“I don't think I would classify it as a confusional arousal,” he added. “But you could classify it as your brain isn't functioning 100 percent, possibly.”
Two Charges Dropped
Also Wednesday, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney dismissed two of three felony charges for allegedly influencing witnesses after police opened an investigation into his wife's shooting.
But Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney did not dismiss a third charge that McIver allegedly tried to influence Carter's testimony.
On Tuesday, McBurney denied a defense motion to dismiss malice murder and felony murder charges.
Carter has testified that, while medical personnel were attempting to save his wife's life at Emory University Hospital, Tex McIver told her she should tell police she was at the hospital as a family friend.
“It would not be irrational for a jury to think Mr. McIver was attempting to mislead Ms. Carter into thinking it was OK to lie to police,” McBurney said. “She said, 'I didn't find it was OK. I didn't lie to police. But that doesn't mean he didn't attempt.'”
But allegedly misleading police wasn't a factor in charges that McIver attempted to influence witness Bill Crane, who acted as McIver's first spokesman in the days following Diane McIver's death. It also was not the basis of a charge that McIver attempted to influence Carter's husband, Tom Carter, when he left a voicemail saying that Dani Jo Carter was “going to send me to prison.”
Crane testified that McIver repeatedly urged him to retract statements he made to the media claiming McIver was holding a gun because he feared Black Lives Matter protesters.
“I roundly reject the notion that the defendant who attempted to mislead … in an effort to get that person to withhold information from the media is a crime,” McBurney said. “That's not how the statute works.”
McBurney also said he did not find that McIver tried to influence Tom Carter.
“What Mr. McIver was trying to do with his voicemail … was really an effort to influence Ms. Carter, not her husband,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAkerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readWoman's Suit Alleging Negligence to Sex Trafficking by Hotel Tossed by Federal Judge
Supreme Court of Georgia Accepts 2 Petitions for Voluntary Discipline With 2-Year Suspension, 1 Voluntary Surrender of License
Trending Stories
- 1Southern California Law Firms Boast Industry-Leading Revenue, Demand Through Q3
- 2AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 3Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 4Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 5'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250