GSU Law Deploys Data Analytics to Boost Bar Pass Rates
Researchers are using predictive modeling so they can identify law students who are statistically at risk—and offer assistance.
April 12, 2018 at 02:36 PM
6 minute read
Georgia State University College of Law is taking a high-tech approach to the troubling national phenomenon of declining bar pass rates.
The law school is developing a program that uses data analytics to identify students most at risk for failing the bar exam. To do that, it's compiling a comprehensive database that tracks pass rates for its recent graduates, starting with the class of 2012, against their grades, classes taken and a multitude of other factors, such as time spent on bar preparation.
With that predictive modeling, the researchers hopes to pinpoint and suggest interventions for students who are statistically at risk after their first year of study.
'Scared Straight'
Jessica Gabel Cino, GSU Law's associate dean for academic affairs, is leading the program. She said one early finding is that material covered in Constitutional Law II, an elective covering due process and individual rights, is “one of the weakest points” for students taking the bar exam. Questions about wills, trusts and estates are also often on the exam—but that course is elective.
“You can't learn that in six weeks,” Cino said, so she will “strongly encourage” a student who appears at risk to take those courses.
Cino said waiting until a student has graduated and is preparing for the bar exam is too late.
“I want to be able to tell you after the first year of law school if you're at risk for failing the bar and that you need to do something—and do something now,” she said.
GSU Law has already established a mandatory daylong “boot camp” in January for third years, Cino said, where they take a diagnostic exam. “They see how bad the bar exam is, so they're 'scared straight.'”
But Cino wants to start pinpointing possible trouble spots for students and ways the law school can help as early as possible.
“In law schools, it's not only our job to make sure they're doing well in the silo of law school. We've really got to help address the bar pass issue,” Cino said.
“It's not enough for me to tell them to study harder. I need to give them a realistic picture of why study harder—and give them the resources,” she said.
GSU Law has also hired Kim D'Haene for a new position as director of academic success to assist in developing programming and individual plans for students. D'Haene is a lecturer for Kaplan Bar Review and was assistant dean for academic achievement at Atlanta's John Marshall Law School.
Pass Rates in Decline
When Cino took on the academic affairs position from Roy Sobelson in 2016, GSU Law had started to see the same concerning drops in its bar pass rates as other law schools.
The bar pass rate for the GSU Law graduating classes of 2012 to 2014 was high, ranging from 95 percent to 92 percent, respectively, for first-time takers of the July exam, according to data from the Georgia Office of Bar Admissions. It dropped to 87.5 percent for the 2015 class, then 82.6 percent for the 2016 class—rebounding slightly to 84.5 percent for the 2017 class.
Even so, GSU Law has the second-highest pass rate of Georgia's five law schools, behind the University of Georgia School of Law.
Bar pass rates for Georgia law schools started to drop in 2013, from an 89.8 percent average pass rate in July 2012 for their first-time test-takers to 75.3 percent for the same group for the July 2016 exam, according to Georgia Office of Bar Admissions statistics.
That's a decline of 14.5 percentage points in that four-year period.
In a positive development, the pass rate for the July 2017 exam rebounded to 79.4 percent for first-time takers from Georgia law schools.
Deploying Data
Meanwhile, GSU researchers had been using analytics tracking to improve graduation rates for its undergraduate class, Cino said, by “identifying the pressure points for students not graduating.”
What the researchers found was that college algebra was a big obstacle, so GSU devoted resources to math tutoring, she said.
Another big obstacle was money. As little as $500 could make a notable difference in undergraduates completing their degree, the researchers found, so GSU offers microloans now.
As a result, the university increased its four-year graduation rate by 9 percentage points from 2011 to 2016.
“Why not build on this amazing work?” Cino said. “We're hoping to do the same with our project and find out what are the pressure points for law students.”
The only real consensus on the problem is that it's “a multitude of factors,” she added.
Cino and a team of student researchers started compiling a database of grades, coursework and bar pass rates at the beginning of the year for the roughly 1,750 students enrolled from 2009 to 2017. That data sample includes earlier classes with high pass rates, which they can compare to the classes for which pass rates declined.
“You need to look at students in years with good bar results and bad bar results so you can make informed decisions,” Cino said.
Cino and GSU professor Andrea Curcio secured an AccessLex Institute/AIR grant to assess whether LSAT scores predict success in law school and on the bar exam, which is helping to fund data collection and inputting.
The law school is also conducting qualitative research. Cino and her team are crafting a questionnaire for all 1,750 of those students and recent alumni that will ask how they studied for the bar, if they are single or married, and what financial pressures they were under.
All those factors and more, Cino said, “play into students' ability to achieve success in law school.”
One factor, she added, could be that students these days don't necessarily take a lot of law classes that “put them in a closed-book, time-test environment,” akin to the bar exam, as schools and students focus more on practical lawyering skills.
For that reason, the survey will ask students how much time they are spending on bar prep. Two popular prep courses, Kaplan Bar Review and Barbri, use online software that tracks students' homework completion, which they can opt to share with the law school. “That's really helpful,” Cino said.
Cino said she and her team hope to have data collection and entry completed by the end of May so they can start running predictive models, with help from GSU data scientists.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readKing & Spalding Adds Veteran Antitrust Litigator From White & Case in New York
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
- 2Pa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
- 3The Unraveling of Sean Combs: How Legislation from the #MeToo Movement Brought Diddy Down
- 4Publication of Information Regarding Client Matters
- 5The State of Cost Recovery — Post COVID
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250