Retirement Class Action Seeks $140M From Home Depot
Home Depot: “We haven't seen the suit yet, but we're proud of the financial support and opportunities for saving that we provide our associates.”
April 12, 2018 at 03:42 PM
3 minute read
Atlanta-based Home Depot was hit Thursday with a potential class action lawsuit demanding $140 million in damages over pension fund management.
The complaint filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia accused Home Depot of violating basic fiduciary duties under ERISA and abusing its employees' trust by mismanaging their 401(k) retirement plan.
According to the complaint, Home Depot has selected multiple poorly-performing funds for its 401(k) plan, allowed investment advisers to charge its employees unreasonable fees and turned a blind eye to a kickback scheme between an investment adviser and the plan's record-keeper.
A Home Depot spokesman said by email Thursday: “We haven't seen the suit yet, but we're proud of the financial support and opportunities for saving that we provide our associates.”
Jaime Pizarro and Craig Smith, both participants in Home Depot's retirement plan, filed the case on behalf of themselves and approximately 200,000 current and former plan participants. Their attorneys are with Sanford Heisler Sharp and Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik De Blouw.
David Sanford, chairman of Sanford Heisler Sharp, said in a news release Thursday, “ERISA's fiduciary standards are strict and exacting. Home Depot retained too many poor-performing investment advisory options on the plan which were highly detrimental to the retirement savings of plan participants. Home Depot and the committees should be held to the highest standard as fiduciaries; instead, in this case, they fall below the lowest standard.”
With over $6 billion in assets, Home Depot's plan is one of the largest 401(k) plans in the country, but the lawyers said many of the plan's investment options regularly underperform their benchmarks.
They alleged the difference could mean the average Home Depot plan participant earns $100,000 less in retirement savings than employees in top-rated retirement plans of a similar size and that a $100,000 disparity translates to an additional 18 years of work per participant.
Norman Blumenthal, the founding partner at Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik De Blouw, said in the news release, “Congress enacted the Employee Retirement Income Security Act to provide basic protections for employees with respect to employee benefit plans offered by their employers. Home Depot engaged in a scheme to undermine these basic protections.”
As relief, they said, the class seeks:
- Compensation for financial losses to plan participants and beneficiaries resulting from the plan's underperforming investments and excessive fees;
- Reform to Home Depot's retirement plan that would remove any imprudent investments and ensure only reasonable investment advisory expenses; and
- Removal of the fiduciaries who have allegedly violated their duties to the plan's participants and beneficiaries under ERISA.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute read'Didn't Notice Patient Wasn't Breathing': $13.7M Verdict Against Anesthesiologists
12 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250