The key argument in the just-concluded criminal trial that saw the acquittal of three defendants accused of illegally video recording former Waffle House CEO Joe Rogers Jr. engaged in a sex act hinged on whether they violated a state law barring the surveillance of someone in a place where they could expect to be in private.

Two veteran lawyers who followed the case closely came to sharply different conclusions.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]