Delta's Top Lawyer 'Begging' for Project-Based Billing
The issue of alternative fee arrangements was among many topics that Delta's Peter Carter and other top lawyers at Fortune 500 companies, including UPS, AIG and Union Pacific, discussed during a panel at the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association's Southeast Regional Conference in Atlanta last week.
April 16, 2018 at 01:21 PM
3 minute read
Usually, Peter Carter is on the receiving end of pitches from lawyers. But on April 13, Delta's chief legal officer flipped the table, making a pitch of his own to about 150 lawyers.
“I am waiting for the law firm that figures out project-based billing,” Carter said during a panel discussion. “I think the industry is begging for it, and I personally am.”
Carter's self-described pitch was directed to attendees of the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association's Southeast Regional Conference in Atlanta. The event included a panel discussion featuring Carter and other top lawyers at Fortune 500 companies: Norman Brothers of UPS Inc., Lucy Fato of AIG Inc. and Rhonda Ferguson of Union Pacific. The discussion was moderated by Michael Wu, GC at Atlanta-based Carter's Inc.
During the wide-ranging discussion, the top lawyers touched on everything from their roles within their organization to what makes a good GC, to their relationships with their outside counsel, a topic which had a unanimous response: Know our business.
Brothers said of his core outside counsel network of just about 26 firms: “What makes firms successful within the network are those that understand our business and are proactive about helping us identify issues we haven't thought about.”
Ferguson added that, in addition to knowledge of the business, she also pays close attention to early resolutions of cases, while Carter said that his outside lawyers must reflect the company's culture and brand.
“These lawyers are Delta incarnate in court,” he said.
And, of course, the bottom line always still matters, the panelists said.
Firms do a disservice to themselves when they send “eye-popping” bills that include rates of up to $1,400 per hour, Fato said. They would be well served, she added, to examine their rates and bills before sending them out.
Alternative billing arrangements often make sense in some situations, Fato said.
“There are some matters where fixed fees are appropriate because they're low-dollar, high-volume,” she said.
To Carter, the key lies in project-based billing.
“It would mean a lot to me if a law firm could give me a project number so that I could look and see that I am going to make my budget every year,” he said.
But it's not just outside relationships that matter, the panelists said. A general counsel's relationship with the company's CEO and other executives is among the most critical, they said.
“It's all about relationships and rapport and being very intentional about developing those relationships,” UPS' Brothers said. “It is impossible to be effective at these jobs unless you have these relationships.”
So what makes an effective GC? Someone who can be the “calm conscience of the company,” Union Pacific's Ferguson said.
“You deal with a lot of gray, so you need someone who can discern and prioritize accordingly,” she said.
Added AIG's Fato: “As GC, you must always remember that your client is the corporation, which is often a tricky balance. You have to find a way to remind people to ask, 'What do we think is best for the company in this situation?'”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGa. Appellate Judges Mull Landlord Responsibility in Premises Liability Case Involving Child Shooting
Corporate Lawyer Accused of Extortion Pushes Back Against $3.7M Judgment
6 minute readMetLife Attorney's Switch to Nelson Mullins Continues String of In-House Moves to Law Firms
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250