Chrysler Pays $40M Jeep Judgment
The total amount with interest: $47,045,342.46, according to lead plaintiffs counsel James Butler Jr. of Butler Wooten & Peak in Atlanta and Columbus.
April 17, 2018 at 04:59 PM
4 minute read
FCA Chrysler has wired the funds to pay the $40 million judgment for the family of 4-year-old Remi Walden, who was killed while riding in a Jeep Grand Cherokee, their attorneys and the company said Monday.
The total amount with interest: $47,045,342.46, according to lead plaintiffs counsel James “Jim” Butler Jr. of Butler Wooten & Peak in Atlanta and Columbus.
The Georgia Supreme Court unanimously upheld the award March 15 for the family of the boy who died when a Jeep burst into flames after it was hit from behind. The Jeep's rear-mounted gas tank was the target of the parents' lawsuit.
Chrysler indicated an interest in asking the U.S. Supreme Court to take a look. “FCA US is disappointed in this decision. We are considering our legal options,” a corporate spokesman said by email March 16. But Chrysler let the March 26 deadline pass for filing a motion to reconsider, the first step in an appeal.
Following a nine-day trial in Bainbridge, the jury awarded the boy's parents $120 million for wrongful death and $30 million for the child's pain and suffering. The verdict apportioned 1 percent of the fault to the other driver and 99 percent to Chrysler. The company filed a motion for a new trial, which Judge Kevin Chason denied on the condition that the parents accept a lower wrongful death award of $30 million and a pain and suffering award of $10 million, which they did. Chrysler then appealed to the Georgia Court of Appeals, but the state's intermediate appellate court upheld the trial court's judgment, as the high court ultimately did as well.
“Remi's family and their lawyers want to most of all thank all the judges and justices who spent so much effort on their case,” Butler said Monday. “Justice is sometimes elusive; this time justice was done.”
Butler tried the case with his son, James “Jeb” Butler III of Butler Tobin. The Butler trial team also included: George Floyd of Bainbridge; former Secretary of State Cathy Cox, now dean of the Mercer University law school; David Rohwedder of Butler Wooten; and Beth Glen, senior paralegal at Butler Wooten. Michael Terry and Frank Lowrey of Bondurant Mixson & Elmore worked with the Butlers on the appeal.
Chrysler's lead appellate counsel on the case was Thomas Dupree Jr., a Washington, D.C.-based partner with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. Dupree hung his oral argument for granting Chrysler a new trial on the company's objection to his opponent bringing up CEO Sergio Marchionne's $68 million-a-year compensation. Dupree complained to the Supreme Court in oral arguments last October that Butler wrote the CEO's pay on a “giant” board in front of the jury.
The Supreme Court opinion supported the trial judge and the Court of Appeals. “We cannot say that the prejudicial effect of the evidence so far outweighed its probative value that its admission was clear and obvious reversible error,” Justice Britt Grant wrote. Rather, she said, judges must determine whether compensation evidence is admissible.
FCA Chrysler's spokesman responded to an inquiry with an emailed statement Monday evening, to be attributed to the company.
“While this tragic accident was caused by a reckless pick-up truck driver who slammed into the rear of a 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee at highway speed, FCA US has decided not to further litigate this case,” the company said. “This decision in no way reflects the company's agreement with the result of the litigation. In fact, the 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee met or exceeded all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards at the time it was built, including the standard for fuel system integrity.”
FCA Chrysler added, “The company hopes the termination of this case can provide some measure of peace to the family of Remi Walden for their tragic loss.”
But Jeb Butler said the company is wrong in that hope.
“If FCA thinks it has bought 'peace,' it is sorely mistaken,” the younger Butler said Monday evening by email. “For Remi's parents, there can never be peace. For the consciences of FCA's executives, there should never be peace. For FCA, there will never be peace until it buys back and destroys every rear-tank Jeep still on the road today.”
The case is Chrysler v. Walden, No. S17G0832.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readOn the Move: Freeman Mathis & Gary Adds Florida Partners, Employment Pro Joins Jackson Lewis
6 minute readVeteran Litigators Move From Sidley Austin to Alston & Bird's New Chicago Office
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250