Fisher & Phillips Reports Revenue Gains, but Profits Stay Flat
Tech investments and slightly lower billable hours per attorney dampened profits last year.
April 19, 2018 at 04:48 PM
5 minute read
Fisher & Phillips reported solid gains in revenue last year, but profits remained flat after big increases in both metrics in 2016.
Revenue at the Atlanta-based labor and employment powerhouse increased 3.8 percent to $183.2 million in 2017, following an 11.7 percent revenue increase and a 6.4 percent increase in net income the prior year.
Net income decreased 0.7 percent to $67 million last year, in part because Fisher & Phillips invested heavily in technology. That pushed down average profits per partner (PPP) by $6,000 to $554,000.
“We were disappointed,” said the firm's chairman, Roger Quillen, adding that the slower revenue growth and flat profits were “not what we expected to see.”
He explained that Fisher & Phillips made major investments in technology and operational improvements, which it expected would dent profits but that those expenses were within budget.
Quillen said the firm also saw a 1.4 percent drop in average billable hours per attorney, as well as “an unusual degree of attrition” among associates last year, which dampened revenue growth.
Fisher & Phillips added a net of 11 lawyers—significantly fewer than the net of 29 it gained in 2016—for average annual head count of 330 lawyers. Revenue per lawyer (RPL) stayed flat at $555,000.
The firm slightly expanded its partnership by a net of six lawyers to 175, with two additional equity partners (for 121) and four additional income partners (for 54).
Quillen said the firm determined that associate attrition last year stemmed from pay scales that were no longer competitive in some cities. He said they made mid-year adjustments in some cities and ended up increasing the pay scale in most of the firm's 32 offices by the end of 2017.
Attorney head count growth has picked up this year, he said, and the firm has not seen any salary-related associate attrition since increasing the pay scale. Fisher & Phillips has hired 24 lawyers since the start of 2018, while losing 11.
The firm also expects to add “a significant number” of lateral partners this year, with conversations in the works, he said.
Practice Shift
Quillen said that, in addition to higher-than-usual nonpartner turnover, the slight decrease in time billed per attorney could have two drivers: lower levels of federal enforcement activity due to policy shifts in the Trump administration and the continued trend of employment litigation moving from federal to state courts.
Meanwhile, many plaintiffs have backed off on filing employment discrimination, harassment and retaliation cases in federal court, perceiving the Supreme Court as overly pro-management and their chances of winning as slim.
“Our lawyers continue to be extremely busy in the states with local laws governing the workplace. This has not been true in states, like Georgia, where there is little to no such state law,” Quillen said.
“We don't see signs of this changing anytime soon,” he added.
As a result, Fisher & Phillips is shifting its practice focus in Georgia and other states from employment litigation to other areas, such as noncompete litigation, safety and health matters, employee benefits and business immigration.
The billable hours per attorney rate so far this year is rising, Quillen said, forecasting a conservative 2 percent increase.
On the operational front, Fisher & Phillips recruited a new CFO, Jim Nations, in March 2017 from Sedgwick, which closed at the beginning of the year, for a reorganization of its finance department, including upgrades in personnel, procedures and software, Quillen said. The firm's lawyer head count has increased by almost 50 percent over the last six years, he said, making the modernization necessary.
The firm then recruited a new chief operating officer in October, Dave Lentz, from Milwaukee-based Michael Best & Friedrich, with the mandate of reviewing its support operations, especially the IT and marketing departments.
Fisher & Phillips invested heavily in improvements to its internet security and data privacy, Quillen said, “all absolutely necessary in the risky and changing information security environment.” It also invested in data analytics and knowledge management—both of which can make pricing and outcomes more predictable for clients.
“These initiatives have continued into 2018 and will continue to have outsized costs in the short run,” Quillen said, “but we consider all of this to be essential to support our clients and our practicing lawyers in the ways they deserve.”
“We will continue to see increased spending, in IT in particular, with expected large payoffs,” he said.
“We are optimistic about 2018,” Quillen concluded. “But everyone on our team knows we have to execute at a high level to return to the kind of growth and success we consider to be normal for Fisher & Phillips.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readKing & Spalding Adds Veteran Antitrust Litigator From White & Case in New York
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Samsung Flooded With Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in Texas Federal Court
- 2How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
- 3On the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
- 4Review of Ex-parte orders by the Appellate Division
- 5'Confusion Where Previously There Was Clarity': NJ Supreme Court Should Void Referral Fee Ethics Opinion
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250