Down $75K, Food Frenzy Faces a Frenetic Friday
Friday is the last day to donate to the food banks as part of the legal community's effort.
April 26, 2018 at 05:37 PM
2 minute read
Organizers of the Georgia Legal Food Frenzy are bracing for a mad scramble to raise $75,000 in the Atlanta area and more around the state in the fundraising competition's final day.
The campaign to help the Atlanta Community Food Bank is ahead of last year's pace but faces a daunting goal of $250,000 for the two-week competition. As of Thursday at 5 p.m., the Atlanta campaign had raised $175,000, a jump of $30,000 for the day.
Attorney General Chris Carr, one of the sponsors of the event, “urged all participating lawyers to donate the equivalent of one billable hour” to the cause, which benefits the 25 percent of Georgia children who are food insecure. “One hour to help these kids thrive and learn instead of worrying about where their next meals is coming from,” Carr wrote.
As competitors scoop up every single dollar they can—each of which can buy four meals for hungry families, according to Food Bank officials—the law firm leaderboard will be interesting to watch. As of 5 p.m., Thursday, King & Spalding held a narrow lead over Joe S. Habachy PC, $17,815 to $16,480.
The other top teams included: Georgia Institute of Technology Office of Legal Affairs, $11,750; Troutman Sanders, $7,761; Jenkins & Roberts, $6,730; Serta Simmons Bedding LLC, $5,555; DeKalb County Public Defender's Office, $4,886; Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, $4,861; Jones Day, $4,324; Moore Ingram Johnson & Steele, LLP,
$4,000.
The event is timed so that food banks can stock up for the coming months, when Georgia children can't get the meals they rely on during the school year.
Last year, the statewide event—sponsored by Carr, the Young Lawyers Division of the State Bar and the Georgia Food Banks Association—raised a record $329,000 and 19,000 pounds of food for all of Georgia's food banks.
Readers who want to donate but aren't supporting a particular team may donate via the Daily Report's team page here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn The Move: Energy Infrastructure Pro Joins Moore & Van Allen, Adams & Reese Changes Atlanta Leadership
6 minute read40% Contingency: A New Ruling Just Cost This Plaintiff Team $827K in Legal Fees
6 minute read'David and Goliath' Dispute Between Software Developers Ends in $24M Settlement
Trending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 2'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 3Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
- 4On the Move and After Hours: Meyner and Landis; Cooper Levenson; Ogletree Deakins; Saiber
- 5State Budget Proposal Includes More Money for Courts—for Now
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250