National, Local Legal Eagles Face Off in Electronic Voting Lawsuit
John Carlin, the former highest-ranking national security lawyer at the U.S. Department of Justice and former FBI director Robert Mueller III's chief of staff and senior counsel, is representing three Georgia voters in their federal lawsuit against Secretary of State Brian Kemp and other state officials, who are represented by former Georgia Gov. Roy Barnes.
May 07, 2018 at 04:21 PM
5 minute read
The Fulton County Election Preparation Center in Atlanta tests electronic voting machines in this Sept. 22, 2016, file photo. (Photo: Alex Sanz/AP)
Some big legal guns are squaring off in a federal lawsuit challenging Georgia's use of all-electronic voting systems.
A major national law firm has deployed attorneys to represent plaintiffs in the suit on a pro bono basis, going up against a more locally based defense team that includes Georgia's former governor.
John Carlin, former assistant U.S. attorney general in charge of the National Security Division, and his partner in the Washington, D.C., office of AmLaw 35 national law firm Morrison & Foerster, David Cross, are representing three Georgia voters who claim their fundamental constitutional right to vote is endangered by the systems.
On the other side, representing the State Election Board, its members and Secretary of State Brian Kemp are John Frank Salter Jr. and former Gov. Roy Barnes of the Barnes Law Group.
Prior to serving as DOJ's highest-ranking national security lawyer, MoFo's Carlin served as chief of staff and senior counsel to former FBI director Robert Mueller III. In that role, he helped lead the agency's evolution to meet growing and changing national security threats, including cyber threats, according to his firm bio.
The lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia alleges that “the inherent flaws” in the Direct Recording Equipment voting system used in Georgia, “render it not possible for the state to comply with the election law or to protect the rights of Georgia voters,” according to the second amended complaint. Georgia is one of only five states to use a wholly electronic voting system.
Specifically, in addition to providing neither a paper trail nor any other means to audit the records of votes, the DREs run on antiquated software that is downloaded from just one central location, which makes the system “far more vulnerable than systems that are managed through numerous sites at the county level across the state,” the complaint states.
The complaint also alleges that in August 2016, a cybersecurity expert was able to access key components of Georgia's electronic election infrastructure, without entering a password, and found private information, including driver's license numbers and the last four digits of Social Security numbers, for more than 6.5 million Georgia voters.
The suit alleges both federal constitutional violations and various state constitutional and statutory violations, including state ballot secrecy laws and disclosure of personal identifying information notification requirements.
It seeks an injunction prohibiting continued use of the DRE system, hopefully in time for the general elections in November, Cross said. He and his partner Carlin got involved in the case, Cross added, in part because there appears to be “no motivation to fix” the issue.
“We're not seeing anything coming out of the federal or state administration to remedy these problems, so it's going to have to be through the courts,” he said.
“For me, this is one of, if not the best, cases out there right now that provide the most effective avenue to take up these election vulnerabilities that we're hearing about,” Cross added.
A representative for Kemp could not be reached for comment.
In its motion to dismiss, the state said it saw the matter quite differently, describing the complaint as “a typical shotgun pleading” that “alleges only generalized fears that Georgia's election machinery is vulnerable to tampering and continue to assert that tampering in prior elections should be presumed.”
The case is pending before U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg. Motions to dismiss have been filed, and a status conference is scheduled for this week.
Other local lawyers on the case include: Halsey Knapp Jr. and Adam Martin Sparks of Krevolin & Horst for the same plaintiffs Cross and Carlin are representing; Robert McGuire of the Robert McGuire Law Firm and Bruce Brown of Bruce P. Brown Law for another plaintiff, advocacy group the Coalition for Good Governance; and Cary Ichter of Ichter Davis and William Brent Ney of Ney Hoffecker Peacock & Hayle for the coalition and three additional Georgia voters.
The slightly more than a dozen county entities and officials named as defendants in the suit are represented by their respective legal departments, with the Cobb County defendants also represented by Daniel Walter White of Haynie, Litchfield Crane and White.
This story has been corrected to eliminate reference to Steptoe & Johnson, as that firm is no longer involved in this litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
Trial Begins for Man Accused of Killing Ga. Nursing Student Laken Riley
5 minute read'Rebound' In Demand For Legal Services Places Southeast Among Top 3 Regions In U.S.
4 minute readMaryland Atty Pushes Judge to Grant Discovery in Reverse Discrimination Suit Against King & Spalding
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 2Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
- 3The Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
- 4November Court of Appeals Roundup
- 5Trellis Launches Trellis AI, a New Suite of Automated Litigation Tools
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250