Michelin's Former and Current GCs Offer a Lawyer's Guide on Expectations
The best way to achieve a goal is to set it. The same is true for expectations. Be simple, clear, and direct. And be candid and constructively self-critical in the assessment.
May 07, 2018 at 06:06 PM
7 minute read
It is no secret that our own George Washington and France's Marquis de Lafayette were dear friends. One of the many reasons for this friendship is attributed to Lafayette's introducing himself to Washington by saying, unlike other French leaders before him, “I am here to learn, not teach.” In this spirit, we are not writing this article to teach anything. Our intent is simply to share a technique we used in recent years to help us communicate and perform. We found it easy and effective. Our hope is that you might find something useful in it, take it, improve upon it and return it in a forum, like this or elsewhere, so that we all continue to learn.
Expectations
A quotation credited to Michelangelo is, “The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim so high that we miss it, but in setting our aim so low that we reach it.”
Here's a simple challenge: ask three lawyers with whom you work to describe the core of their jobs—what they are responsible to accomplish. Whether in-house or private practice, you might be surprised to learn how inconsistently those around you answer the simple question: what is expected? Associates at a private law firm might quote billable or collection goals, while in-house counsel might regurgitate a legal department quality statement or slogan.
Worse yet, you may get a blank stare.
An easy, practical way to work well as a team is to set clear expectations. This is true for real people, and even for lawyers.
In Michelin's legal department, the expectations we set for the internal staff were simple individually but lofty in the collective. After a few revisions and several test runs, we ended up with the following list:
- Excellent results
- Engage
- Communicate clearly and often
- Know the business
- Look outside
- Teamwork
Realizing that lawyers are always debating and that more specificity is better than less, we went a step further and defined each one in the context of a variety of practice areas:
Excellent Results
Outputs that move the business forward are actually realized (as distinguished from effort); resources are aligned to high risk/strategic areas; problems/risks are identified and corrected before impact (proactive vs. reactive).
- Deals are closed / Patents are filed
- Trials and motions are won
- Contracts are signed (on our terms)
- Risk is defined, audited and corrected
- Process improvements are implemented and routinely tested
Engage
Visible, positive action to further department and company interests; active participation and interest in the work of your colleagues.
- Participative attendance at scheduled meetings
- “Tension” in the system—differing viewpoints are offered and debated
- New practices/improvements/recommendations are suggested outside your area of direct responsibility
Communicate Clearly and Often
Information flows vertically and horizontally; it is clear, concise and regularized; it is effective – audience leaves with an understanding of important points; the “message” is intentional; communications are visible and tangible—documented and shared with other stakeholders.
- Publication of a standard report on an established schedule
- Visibility of reporting to your management and your teammates
- High-level information with recommendations offered directly to senior client management
- Recommendations are in writing
- Surprises are avoided
Know the Business
General knowledge of industry and competitors, and solid working knowledge of your clients' business and goals.
- You keep awareness of industry developments and media
- You know your clients' products, technology, and problems, as well as their key customers, suppliers, and relationships
- You understand the financial performance of the company and its business units.
Look Outside
An awareness of the legal and business environment and its potential impact on clients; an inclination to ask what other companies and industries are doing, and whether we should consider a similar or different course.
- You are alert to propose risk reductions because you are aware of competitors' and partners' legal challenges.
- You benchmark performance, problems, advice, solutions, practices, etc., against industry, competitors and best practices.
- You leverage a network of contacts that permits you to stay informed, and you utilize it to make changes that improve things within the company.
Teamwork
Colleagues consistently view you as someone who contributes to their success and to the success of the department; other departments seek out opportunities to work with you and the legal department because of what it offers.
- You respond timely to the requests of your colleagues.
- You offer to take on work when someone is clearly “under water.”
- Others seek your input, as opposed to working around you.
- You share information and expertise freely.
At the end of each year, we self-assessed using color codes: green for excellent, yellow for acceptable, orange for needs improvement, and red for not good. Here is an example for illustrative purposes only:
The feedback from the team was positive. Same from clients. Simple, practical, and clear. Even bonus points because we were the lawyers being simple and clear.
Step 2 was to deploy this system to outside counsel partners. We used the same expectations, but with refined definitions. Here is an example for a firm doing Michelin's litigation work:
Expectations
Excellent Results (yellow)
- Trial wins
- Leadership
- Credibility with judges / plaintiff lawyers
- No discovery sanctions
- Substantive local inputs
Engage (green)
- Visibility in the local market
- With other Regional Counsel / Discovery Coordinating Counsel
- “Tension” in the system
Communicate Clearly and Often (yellow)
- “Upstream delegation”
- Regular, consistent, disciplined
- Focus on solutions and how they can be applied
- No surprises
Know the Business (orange)
- Tire industry
- Michelin
- Litigation Group
- “Know what people do”
Look Outside (red)
- “Thought Leaders”
- Benchmarks
- New ideas
Teamwork (green)
Cooperation / team work = less resource
Importantly, and in the spirit of eating our own cooking, we asked each law firm to advise on ways we could improve in meeting their expectations.
The Take-away
The best way to achieve a goal is to set it. The same is true for expectations. Be simple, clear, and direct. And be candid and constructively self-critical in the assessment.
Hall of Fame coach Lou Holtz often says, “You live up—or down—to expectations.” We agree.
Dan Sanders is a partner in Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough's Greenville, S.C., and Atlanta offices, where he practices with both the corporate and litigation groups. He is a former vice-president, general counsel and secretary of Michelin North America Inc.
Valerie P. Williams is Michelin's vice-president, general counsel and secretary.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBilling Rate Increases Boost Atlanta and Southeast Law Firms' Financial Growth
6 minute readBradley Arant Sees Revenues Rise and PEP Fall Amid 12% Equity Partner Expansion
5 minute readAs Associate Pay Raises Divide the Market, Several Law Firms Match, Others Hold Off
5 minute readPhila.-Based Weber Gallagher Opens Florida Outpost With Fowler White Partner
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
- 2On the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
- 3Review of Ex-parte orders by the Appellate Division
- 4'Confusion Where Previously There Was Clarity': NJ Supreme Court Should Void Referral Fee Ethics Opinion
- 5How Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250