Mental Health Advocates Say Georgia Will Miss DOJ Deadline
At a recent panel centered around the U.S. Department of Justice's 2010 landmark settlement with Georgia over the care of its developmentally disabled citizens, mental health advocates said the state will likely miss the agreement's June 30 compliance deadline. But that doesn't mean that Georgia hasn't made big strides in integrating these individuals into their communities, the panelists explained.
May 14, 2018 at 05:42 PM
4 minute read
Left to right: Judy Fitzgerald, commissioner of the Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, Jewell Gooding, executive director of Mental Health America of Georgia, Cynthia Wainscott, a member of the Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Regional Advisory Council, and Susan Goico, staff attorney with the Disability Integration Project at Atlanta Legal Aid Society, during a panel discussion at the Carter Center. Photo credit: Carter Center
June 30 is the deadline for Georgia to remove developmentally disabled adults from state mental hospitals, but it appears the process will likely continue beyond the end of next month.
That's the message that Susan Walker Goico, director of the Disability Integration Project at Atlanta Legal Aid Society, and other mental health public officials and advocates shared Friday during an event at the Carter Center in Atlanta.
Goico and others were speaking at a panel at the 23nd annual Rosalynn Carter Georgia Mental Health Forum about the U.S. Department of Justice's 2010 landmark settlement with Georgia over the care of its developmentally disabled citizens, outlining how far the state has come and how far it still needs to go.
“The extension agreement has no automatic termination date, so the hard work and diligence of the state will continue” beyond June 30, Goico said.
More than 230 individuals with developmental disabilities remain institutionalized in Georgia's mental hospitals, though that number is down from 1,142 in October 2010, said Cynthia Wainscott, a member of the Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD) Regional Advisory Council, who also spoke on the panel.
The rate at which those placements are occurring is increasing as well, she added, as 31 individuals so far this year have been removed from state hospitals compared with the 16 that were moved during all of last year.
Stemming from a lawsuit brought by the DOJ's Civil Rights Division under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, the October 2010 settlement agreement was intended to transform Georgia's delivery of services for people who have developmental disabilities. The mandate is meant to integrate these individuals into local communities.
Key to that community integration are provisions that the individuals in question have access to adequate social and medical services, including housing, supported employment and the guidance of adequate support staff and crisis teams, that would allow them to live in those communities while keeping them safe.
In signing the settlement, the state had agreed to comply with all its terms within five years. In September 2015, however, Justice Department lawyers formally notified the state it was not in compliance with the settlement, so in May 2016 the DOJ and Georgia entered into an extension agreement. This extension set June 30 as the deadline to provide housing outside the state's hospitals for its developmentally disabled adults.
The most recent report of the settlement's independent reviewer noted both the state's progress toward meeting that deadline and areas of noncompliance.
Panelist Jewell Gooding, executive director of Mental Health America of Georgia, pointed out that according to reviews, 30 of 39 individuals residing in a “crisis respite home” have been doing so for more than 30 days, and some have been in these residences since as early as 2013. These respite homes were developed during the first agreement with the DOJ to provide short-term care for individuals with developmental disabilities and their families.
Even with the delay in compliance, the landscape for individuals suffering from mental health and developmental disabilities in Georgia today is unrecognizable from that of even 10 years ago, said panelist Judy Fitzgerald, commissioner of the state DBHDD. She said she recently reread the complaint in the original lawsuit from the Justice Department and found the experience both “depressing and rewarding.”
“It was painful to read about individuals in such a broken system but rewarding because that's not the system we are anymore,” Fitzgerald said.
The Daily Report could not reach a representative for the state.
Atlanta's Troutman Sanders and Robbins Ross Alloy Belinfante Littlefield have been defending the state in the matter.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute read'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250