Rainmakers-in-Training Need Time to Train, Experts Say
"The best place to meet clients is where the clients are," said one law firm partner.
May 15, 2018 at 12:36 PM
4 minute read
Marketing. Client development. Rainmaking.
No matter what words describe it, the business of getting more business is a constant pressure in law firms. Stephanie Friese said training new lawyers must include making time for this goal.
“We need to create a space so younger attorneys can build a book of business,” said Friese, managing partner of Pursley Friese Torgrimson, a 12-lawyer firm that handles a host of commercial real estate matters.
She said her firm requires lawyers to bill 1,650 hours per year, on the lower side of the market—but they need 300 hours of business development on top. “We track those hours,” she said.
Friese referred back to her experience as a new lawyer trying to start her own firm. She threw herself into meeting people in the industry she wanted to serve, eventually getting involved in Commercial Real Estate Women of Atlanta. There she met in-house counsel and served on committees.
“Make sure what you're involved in puts you on the leadership path,” she noted.
At a much bigger firm, 165-lawyer Arnall Golden Gregory, partner Michael Golden takes a similar approach, saying the firm encourages lawyers to get involved in business organizations.
“The best place to meet clients is where the clients are,” said Golden, who co-leads the firm's closely held and family business practice. But he cautioned that lawyers don't attend, for example, a trade association meeting to look for clients. Instead, one goes to demonstrate knowledge of the law that affects that industry.
Like Friese, Golden noted that participating in associations and committees pays off best when its substantial enough to earn a place of leadership. That kind of work—recruiting speakers and identifying important issues—gives lawyers opportunities to showcase their expertise.
And the firm gives associates credit for time spent involved in marketing and business development, he added.
At 195-lawyer Morris, Manning, & Martin, John Yates said the firm has a guideline to help train rainmakers: “Never have a meal with a prospective client or strategic partner without an MMM colleague.”
“Attorneys are observant, and it's amazing how often younger colleagues learn from seasoned business development veterans,” he added. “They often pick up, by osmosis, key pointers that help them win a new client. And lawyers hunting for new business are more likely to be successful through teamwork.”
Yates, who heads the firm's technology practice, added that for the past several years, the entire corporate tech group has met—associates and partners—to review current business development projects, prospect pipelines and key metrics (new clients and outstanding prospects).
Those meetings include case studies on how the team gained a new client and a review of upcoming events that will be of interest to clients and prospects. The firm has also started videotaping business development presentations for internal viewing.
“We believe they'll prove to be very helpful in the training process,” Yates added.
Friese was asked whether any of this training can walk out the door when a lawyer with a freshly built book of business goes to a new firm.
“It definitely happens,” she said, but she added, “It's a risk we have to take when we grow.”
For more business of law coverage exclusively geared toward midsize firms, sign up for a free trial of ALM's new weekly newsletter, The Mid-Market Report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
8 minute readOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250