$1.7M Car Wreck Verdict Includes $500K for 'Frivolous' Defense
Plaintiff attorney Jon Pope said he initially thought the defense's sudden admission that the plaintiff was injured was a "brilliant trial strategy" designed to throw him off guard.
May 16, 2018 at 01:20 PM
4 minute read
A Gwinnett County jury awarded a woman injured in a car accident $1.2 million in damages, then tacked on an extra $500,000 after a minitrial determined the defense pursued frivolous arguments.
Hasty Pope partner Jonathan Pope said the defense maintained throughout the litigation that his client suffered no injuries, only to agree at the beginning of trial that the woman was hurt in the wreck.
“My first thought was, 'Wow, this is some brilliant trial strategy, you've really caught me off guard,'” said Pope.
“But the law says you're not allowed to introduce evidence to contradict your own binding admission,” he said. “I got up and said, 'Why are we here? The defense denied any injury whatsoever up to now.'”
Pope credited defense attorney Kristie Fitzgerald of State Farm Insurance's in-house counsel, Lynn Leonard & Associates, with doing a good job with the case she had.
“I give her credit,” said Pope. “This was a very serious case, but relatively routine for a motor vehicle case. I had asked for $2.5 million to $3 million in damages.
Fitzgerald did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
The accident occurred in 2014 in Alpharetta when Donna Harry was turning at a stoplight. A Chevy TrailBlazer driven by Marica Matasic ran the light and hit Harry's Honda Odyssey, knocking it into another vehicle.
Pope said Matasic admitted she hit Harry's car doing about 45 mph, and there was evidence she was using her cellphone just before the wreck.
Harry, then 49, was “banged up” initially, but then started losing strength in her dominant left hand, Pope said. Her doctors determined she had an injury to her ulnar nerve, which runs from the neck to the hand.
She underwent surgery but continues to have pain radiating into her fingers, and is unable to fully use her hand, Pope said.
Harry sued Matasic in Gwinnett County State Court in 2016.
The initial investigation indicated there was $250,000 in coverage through State Farm, and Pope made a time-limited Holt demand for the policy limits.
“State Farm did not formally respond, then stopped responding at all,” said Pope. “We couldn't get them on the phone.”
Further inquiries revealed additional coverage of more than $1 million between Harry and Matasic's policies, Pope said.
“After the policy discovery, they asked to go to mediation,” said Pope. “By then we were all feeling a little pushed. They offered $40,000 at mediation, and we pretty much felt we were going to have to try the case.”
State Farm offered to settle for $400,000 shortly before trial was set to start in March before Gwinnett County State Court Chief Judge Pamela South, Pope said.
“We just felt like she wasn't able to use her hand, she can't put on jewelry or comb her hair. These are permanent, life-changing injuries,” he said, and the offer was denied.
The only expert testimony was from Harry's health providers, Pope said. The defense did not call any witnesses.
The jury awarded $1.2 million after three days of trial.
Pope then made an oral motion for damages under O.C.G.A. S ection 9-11-68(e), which provides for a separate hearing to determine if “frivolous claims or defense were asserted” by the opposing party.
During a second “minitrial,” Pope said he explained to the jury that “if they had just admitted Ms. Harry was injured from the beginning, it would have made this whole process easier.”
Pope said he and Hasty Pope colleague Dustin Davies produced evidence of their fee agreement, hours worked and expenses, and the jury came back the following morning to award $506,000 in damages.
Pope said he did not speak to the jurors at any length.
“They were all pretty much ready to get out of there,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEvidence Explained: Prevailing Attorney Outlines Successful Defense in Inmate Death Case
Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readTrial Court Had No Authority to Reopen Voir Dire After Jury Impaneled in Civil Case, State Appellate Court Rules
Trending Stories
- 1Bass Berry & Sims Relocates to Nashville Office Designed to Encourage Collaboration, Inclusion
- 2Legaltech Rundown: McDermott Will & Emery Invests $10 Million in The LegalTech Fund, LexisNexis Releases Conversational Search for Nexis+ AI, and More
- 3The TikTokification of the Courtroom
- 4New Jersey’s Arbitration Appeal Deadline—A Call for Clarity
- 5Law Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250